Cargando…

Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions

Nowadays, implants and prostheses are widely used to repair damaged tissues or to treat different diseases, but their use is associated with the risk of infection, inflammation and finally rejection. To address these issues, new antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory materials are being developed. Afor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Frisch, Emilie, Clavier, Lisa, Belhamdi, Abdessamad, Vrana, Nihal Engin, Lavalle, Philippe, Frisch, Benoît, Heurtault, Béatrice, Gribova, Varvara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1193204
_version_ 1785087700512014336
author Frisch, Emilie
Clavier, Lisa
Belhamdi, Abdessamad
Vrana, Nihal Engin
Lavalle, Philippe
Frisch, Benoît
Heurtault, Béatrice
Gribova, Varvara
author_facet Frisch, Emilie
Clavier, Lisa
Belhamdi, Abdessamad
Vrana, Nihal Engin
Lavalle, Philippe
Frisch, Benoît
Heurtault, Béatrice
Gribova, Varvara
author_sort Frisch, Emilie
collection PubMed
description Nowadays, implants and prostheses are widely used to repair damaged tissues or to treat different diseases, but their use is associated with the risk of infection, inflammation and finally rejection. To address these issues, new antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory materials are being developed. Aforementioned materials require their thorough preclinical testing before clinical applications can be envisaged. Although many researchers are currently working on new in vitro tissues for drug screening and tissue replacement, in vitro models for evaluation of new biomaterials are just emerging and are extremely rare. In this context, there is an increased need for advanced in vitro models, which would best recapitulate the in vivo environment, limiting animal experimentation and adapted to the multitude of these materials. Here, we overview currently available preclinical methods and models for biological in vitro evaluation of new biomaterials. We describe several biological tests used in biocompatibility assessment, which is a primordial step in new material’s development, and discuss existing challenges in this field. In the second part, the emphasis is made on the development of new 3D models and approaches for preclinical evaluation of biomaterials. The third part focuses on the main parameters to consider to achieve the optimal conditions for evaluating biocompatibility; we also overview differences in regulations across different geographical regions and regulatory systems. Finally, we discuss future directions for the development of innovative biomaterial-related assays: in silico models, dynamic testing models, complex multicellular and multiple organ systems, as well as patient-specific personalized testing approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104161152023-08-12 Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions Frisch, Emilie Clavier, Lisa Belhamdi, Abdessamad Vrana, Nihal Engin Lavalle, Philippe Frisch, Benoît Heurtault, Béatrice Gribova, Varvara Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Nowadays, implants and prostheses are widely used to repair damaged tissues or to treat different diseases, but their use is associated with the risk of infection, inflammation and finally rejection. To address these issues, new antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory materials are being developed. Aforementioned materials require their thorough preclinical testing before clinical applications can be envisaged. Although many researchers are currently working on new in vitro tissues for drug screening and tissue replacement, in vitro models for evaluation of new biomaterials are just emerging and are extremely rare. In this context, there is an increased need for advanced in vitro models, which would best recapitulate the in vivo environment, limiting animal experimentation and adapted to the multitude of these materials. Here, we overview currently available preclinical methods and models for biological in vitro evaluation of new biomaterials. We describe several biological tests used in biocompatibility assessment, which is a primordial step in new material’s development, and discuss existing challenges in this field. In the second part, the emphasis is made on the development of new 3D models and approaches for preclinical evaluation of biomaterials. The third part focuses on the main parameters to consider to achieve the optimal conditions for evaluating biocompatibility; we also overview differences in regulations across different geographical regions and regulatory systems. Finally, we discuss future directions for the development of innovative biomaterial-related assays: in silico models, dynamic testing models, complex multicellular and multiple organ systems, as well as patient-specific personalized testing approaches. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10416115/ /pubmed/37576997 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1193204 Text en Copyright © 2023 Frisch, Clavier, Belhamdi, Vrana, Lavalle, Frisch, Heurtault and Gribova. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frisch, Emilie
Clavier, Lisa
Belhamdi, Abdessamad
Vrana, Nihal Engin
Lavalle, Philippe
Frisch, Benoît
Heurtault, Béatrice
Gribova, Varvara
Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions
title Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions
title_full Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions
title_fullStr Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions
title_full_unstemmed Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions
title_short Preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions
title_sort preclinical in vitro evaluation of implantable materials: conventional approaches, new models and future directions
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576997
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1193204
work_keys_str_mv AT frischemilie preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections
AT clavierlisa preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections
AT belhamdiabdessamad preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections
AT vrananihalengin preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections
AT lavallephilippe preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections
AT frischbenoit preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections
AT heurtaultbeatrice preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections
AT gribovavarvara preclinicalinvitroevaluationofimplantablematerialsconventionalapproachesnewmodelsandfuturedirections