Cargando…

Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options

SEIC is a non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium considered to be the precursor to uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and is just as aggressive as USC. Currently, there are no reliable data about the behavior and prognosis of SEIC; therefore, the therapeutic management approach is not clear....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ronsini, Carlo, Reino, Antonella, Molitierno, Rossella, Vastarella, Maria Giovanna, La Mantia, Elvira, De Franciscis, Pasquale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511804
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13071429
_version_ 1785087708507406336
author Ronsini, Carlo
Reino, Antonella
Molitierno, Rossella
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
La Mantia, Elvira
De Franciscis, Pasquale
author_facet Ronsini, Carlo
Reino, Antonella
Molitierno, Rossella
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
La Mantia, Elvira
De Franciscis, Pasquale
author_sort Ronsini, Carlo
collection PubMed
description SEIC is a non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium considered to be the precursor to uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and is just as aggressive as USC. Currently, there are no reliable data about the behavior and prognosis of SEIC; therefore, the therapeutic management approach is not clear. Method: A systematic search of the Pubmed, Scopus and Embase databases was conducted, following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: Of the 296 studies that matched the search criteria, only 9 met the inclusion criteria, covering a total of 81 patients. The main disease-presenting pattern was AUB (abnormal uterine bleeding). In 31 cases, SEIC was associated with extrauterine disease. All patients underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, while only 15 of the 81 patients received adjuvant treatments. In the patients receiving adjuvant therapy, the RR was 42.67%, the DFS was 35.71% and the OS was 57.13%. In patients subjected to follow-up alone, the RR was only 28.78%, the DFS was 59.1% and the OS was 66.6%. Conclusions: The presence of an extrauterine disease significantly worsens outcomes, regardless of adjuvant treatment. In cases of disease confined to the uterine mucosa alone, the prognosis is good and follow-up allows a good control of the disease; however, adjuvant therapy could further increase survival rates and reduce relapse rates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104161512023-08-12 Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options Ronsini, Carlo Reino, Antonella Molitierno, Rossella Vastarella, Maria Giovanna La Mantia, Elvira De Franciscis, Pasquale Life (Basel) Systematic Review SEIC is a non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium considered to be the precursor to uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and is just as aggressive as USC. Currently, there are no reliable data about the behavior and prognosis of SEIC; therefore, the therapeutic management approach is not clear. Method: A systematic search of the Pubmed, Scopus and Embase databases was conducted, following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: Of the 296 studies that matched the search criteria, only 9 met the inclusion criteria, covering a total of 81 patients. The main disease-presenting pattern was AUB (abnormal uterine bleeding). In 31 cases, SEIC was associated with extrauterine disease. All patients underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, while only 15 of the 81 patients received adjuvant treatments. In the patients receiving adjuvant therapy, the RR was 42.67%, the DFS was 35.71% and the OS was 57.13%. In patients subjected to follow-up alone, the RR was only 28.78%, the DFS was 59.1% and the OS was 66.6%. Conclusions: The presence of an extrauterine disease significantly worsens outcomes, regardless of adjuvant treatment. In cases of disease confined to the uterine mucosa alone, the prognosis is good and follow-up allows a good control of the disease; however, adjuvant therapy could further increase survival rates and reduce relapse rates. MDPI 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10416151/ /pubmed/37511804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13071429 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ronsini, Carlo
Reino, Antonella
Molitierno, Rossella
Vastarella, Maria Giovanna
La Mantia, Elvira
De Franciscis, Pasquale
Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options
title Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options
title_full Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options
title_fullStr Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options
title_full_unstemmed Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options
title_short Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options
title_sort critical overview of serous endometrial intraepithelial cancer treatment: systematic review of adjuvant options
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511804
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13071429
work_keys_str_mv AT ronsinicarlo criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions
AT reinoantonella criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions
AT molitiernorossella criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions
AT vastarellamariagiovanna criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions
AT lamantiaelvira criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions
AT defranciscispasquale criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions