Cargando…
Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options
SEIC is a non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium considered to be the precursor to uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and is just as aggressive as USC. Currently, there are no reliable data about the behavior and prognosis of SEIC; therefore, the therapeutic management approach is not clear....
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13071429 |
_version_ | 1785087708507406336 |
---|---|
author | Ronsini, Carlo Reino, Antonella Molitierno, Rossella Vastarella, Maria Giovanna La Mantia, Elvira De Franciscis, Pasquale |
author_facet | Ronsini, Carlo Reino, Antonella Molitierno, Rossella Vastarella, Maria Giovanna La Mantia, Elvira De Franciscis, Pasquale |
author_sort | Ronsini, Carlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | SEIC is a non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium considered to be the precursor to uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and is just as aggressive as USC. Currently, there are no reliable data about the behavior and prognosis of SEIC; therefore, the therapeutic management approach is not clear. Method: A systematic search of the Pubmed, Scopus and Embase databases was conducted, following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: Of the 296 studies that matched the search criteria, only 9 met the inclusion criteria, covering a total of 81 patients. The main disease-presenting pattern was AUB (abnormal uterine bleeding). In 31 cases, SEIC was associated with extrauterine disease. All patients underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, while only 15 of the 81 patients received adjuvant treatments. In the patients receiving adjuvant therapy, the RR was 42.67%, the DFS was 35.71% and the OS was 57.13%. In patients subjected to follow-up alone, the RR was only 28.78%, the DFS was 59.1% and the OS was 66.6%. Conclusions: The presence of an extrauterine disease significantly worsens outcomes, regardless of adjuvant treatment. In cases of disease confined to the uterine mucosa alone, the prognosis is good and follow-up allows a good control of the disease; however, adjuvant therapy could further increase survival rates and reduce relapse rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10416151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104161512023-08-12 Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options Ronsini, Carlo Reino, Antonella Molitierno, Rossella Vastarella, Maria Giovanna La Mantia, Elvira De Franciscis, Pasquale Life (Basel) Systematic Review SEIC is a non-invasive lesion of the endometrial epithelium considered to be the precursor to uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and is just as aggressive as USC. Currently, there are no reliable data about the behavior and prognosis of SEIC; therefore, the therapeutic management approach is not clear. Method: A systematic search of the Pubmed, Scopus and Embase databases was conducted, following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Results: Of the 296 studies that matched the search criteria, only 9 met the inclusion criteria, covering a total of 81 patients. The main disease-presenting pattern was AUB (abnormal uterine bleeding). In 31 cases, SEIC was associated with extrauterine disease. All patients underwent hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy, while only 15 of the 81 patients received adjuvant treatments. In the patients receiving adjuvant therapy, the RR was 42.67%, the DFS was 35.71% and the OS was 57.13%. In patients subjected to follow-up alone, the RR was only 28.78%, the DFS was 59.1% and the OS was 66.6%. Conclusions: The presence of an extrauterine disease significantly worsens outcomes, regardless of adjuvant treatment. In cases of disease confined to the uterine mucosa alone, the prognosis is good and follow-up allows a good control of the disease; however, adjuvant therapy could further increase survival rates and reduce relapse rates. MDPI 2023-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10416151/ /pubmed/37511804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13071429 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Ronsini, Carlo Reino, Antonella Molitierno, Rossella Vastarella, Maria Giovanna La Mantia, Elvira De Franciscis, Pasquale Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options |
title | Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options |
title_full | Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options |
title_fullStr | Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options |
title_short | Critical Overview of Serous Endometrial Intraepithelial Cancer Treatment: Systematic Review of Adjuvant Options |
title_sort | critical overview of serous endometrial intraepithelial cancer treatment: systematic review of adjuvant options |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37511804 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life13071429 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ronsinicarlo criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions AT reinoantonella criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions AT molitiernorossella criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions AT vastarellamariagiovanna criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions AT lamantiaelvira criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions AT defranciscispasquale criticaloverviewofserousendometrialintraepithelialcancertreatmentsystematicreviewofadjuvantoptions |