Cargando…

The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to summarize, synthesize, and integrate the evidence evaluating the effectiveness of biophysical agents compared to other conservative treatments, for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: This was an overview of systematic reviews (SRs). We searched...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dabbagh, Armaghan, Ziebart, Christina, MacDermid, Joy C, Packham, Tara, Grewal, Ruby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06778-z
_version_ 1785087758108196864
author Dabbagh, Armaghan
Ziebart, Christina
MacDermid, Joy C
Packham, Tara
Grewal, Ruby
author_facet Dabbagh, Armaghan
Ziebart, Christina
MacDermid, Joy C
Packham, Tara
Grewal, Ruby
author_sort Dabbagh, Armaghan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Our objective was to summarize, synthesize, and integrate the evidence evaluating the effectiveness of biophysical agents compared to other conservative treatments, for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: This was an overview of systematic reviews (SRs). We searched several online databases and obtained SRs relating to managing CTS using biophysical agents. Two independent researchers screened and appraised the quality of the SRs using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2 appraisal tool. We extracted information related to study characteristics as well as the effectiveness of biophysical agents for CTS, the effect sizes, and between-group significances. We categorized the information based on the type of biophysical agent. We also performed a citation mapping and calculated the corrected covered area index. RESULTS: We found 17 SRs addressing 12 different biophysical agents. The quality of the SRs was mainly critically low (n = 16) or low (n = 1). The evidence was inconclusive for the effectiveness of Low-level Laser therapy and favorable for the short-term efficacy of non-thermal ultrasound in improving symptom severity, function, pain, global rating of improvement, satisfaction with treatment, and other electrophysiological measures compared to manual therapy or placebo. Evidence was inconclusive for Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy, and favorable for the short-term effectiveness of Shortwave and Microwave Diathermy on pain and hand function. The corrected covered area index was lower than 35% indicating a low overlap of the SRs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings were based on low-quality primary studies, with an unclear or high risk of bias, small sample sizes, and short follow-ups. Therefore, no recommendations can be made for the long-term effectiveness of any biophysical agents. High-quality evidence is needed to support evidence-based recommendations on the use of biophysical agents in the management of CTS. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022319002, registered on 17/04/2022 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06778-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104163722023-08-12 The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review Dabbagh, Armaghan Ziebart, Christina MacDermid, Joy C Packham, Tara Grewal, Ruby BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Our objective was to summarize, synthesize, and integrate the evidence evaluating the effectiveness of biophysical agents compared to other conservative treatments, for the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS: This was an overview of systematic reviews (SRs). We searched several online databases and obtained SRs relating to managing CTS using biophysical agents. Two independent researchers screened and appraised the quality of the SRs using the A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews-2 appraisal tool. We extracted information related to study characteristics as well as the effectiveness of biophysical agents for CTS, the effect sizes, and between-group significances. We categorized the information based on the type of biophysical agent. We also performed a citation mapping and calculated the corrected covered area index. RESULTS: We found 17 SRs addressing 12 different biophysical agents. The quality of the SRs was mainly critically low (n = 16) or low (n = 1). The evidence was inconclusive for the effectiveness of Low-level Laser therapy and favorable for the short-term efficacy of non-thermal ultrasound in improving symptom severity, function, pain, global rating of improvement, satisfaction with treatment, and other electrophysiological measures compared to manual therapy or placebo. Evidence was inconclusive for Extracorporeal Shockwave therapy, and favorable for the short-term effectiveness of Shortwave and Microwave Diathermy on pain and hand function. The corrected covered area index was lower than 35% indicating a low overlap of the SRs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings were based on low-quality primary studies, with an unclear or high risk of bias, small sample sizes, and short follow-ups. Therefore, no recommendations can be made for the long-term effectiveness of any biophysical agents. High-quality evidence is needed to support evidence-based recommendations on the use of biophysical agents in the management of CTS. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022319002, registered on 17/04/2022 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-023-06778-z. BioMed Central 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10416372/ /pubmed/37563725 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06778-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Dabbagh, Armaghan
Ziebart, Christina
MacDermid, Joy C
Packham, Tara
Grewal, Ruby
The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review
title The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review
title_full The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review
title_short The effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review
title_sort effectiveness of biophysical agents in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome- an umbrella review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563725
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06778-z
work_keys_str_mv AT dabbagharmaghan theeffectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT ziebartchristina theeffectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT macdermidjoyc theeffectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT packhamtara theeffectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT grewalruby theeffectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT dabbagharmaghan effectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT ziebartchristina effectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT macdermidjoyc effectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT packhamtara effectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview
AT grewalruby effectivenessofbiophysicalagentsinthetreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeanumbrellareview