Cargando…

Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity

BACKGROUND: The tongue-rolling behaviour of cows is regarded as an outward sign of stressed animals in a low welfare status. The primary aim of this observational study was to evaluate the association between the frequency of tongue-rolling behaviour and its physiological function. The secondary aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Fuyu, Chen, Xiaoyang, Li, Yongfeng, Zhao, Guangyong, Gu, Xianhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00906-4
_version_ 1785087779004219392
author Sun, Fuyu
Chen, Xiaoyang
Li, Yongfeng
Zhao, Guangyong
Gu, Xianhong
author_facet Sun, Fuyu
Chen, Xiaoyang
Li, Yongfeng
Zhao, Guangyong
Gu, Xianhong
author_sort Sun, Fuyu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The tongue-rolling behaviour of cows is regarded as an outward sign of stressed animals in a low welfare status. The primary aim of this observational study was to evaluate the association between the frequency of tongue-rolling behaviour and its physiological function. The secondary aim was to explore the relationship between general activities and the frequency of tongue-rolling behaviour of cows. A total of 126 scan sampling behavioural observations were collected over 7 d on 348 Holstein cows with the same lactation stage in the same barn. The tongue-rolling frequency was defined as the number of tongue-rolling observations as a percentage to the total observations per individual cow. According to their tongue-rolling frequency, the cows were grouped into the CON (no tongue-rolling), LT (frequency 1%), MT (frequency 5%), and HT (frequency 10%) groups. Six cows from each group were randomly selected for sampling. Serum samples, rumen fluid, milk yield, and background information were collected. The general behaviour data during 72 continuous hours of dairy cows, including eating time, rumination time, food time (eating time + rumination time), and lying time, were recorded by the collar sensor. RESULTS: Cortisol (P = 0.012), γ-hydroxybutyric acid (P = 0.008), epinephrine (P = 0.030), and dopamine (P = 0.047) levels were significantly higher in tongue-rolling groups than in the CON group. Cortisol levels and tongue-rolling frequency had a moderate positive correlation (linearly r = 0.363). With the increase in tongue-rolling frequency, the rumen pH decreased first and then increased (P = 0.013), comparing to the CON group. HT cows had significantly less food time than CON cows (P = 0.035). The frequency of tongue-rolling had a moderate negative relationship with rumination time (r = −0.384) and food time (r = −0.492). CONCLUSIONS: The tongue-rolling behaviour is considered as a passive coping mechanism, as the stress response in cows with high tongue-rolling frequency increased. Food intake and rumination activities were all closely related to the occurrence of tongue-rolling behaviour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104164472023-08-12 Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity Sun, Fuyu Chen, Xiaoyang Li, Yongfeng Zhao, Guangyong Gu, Xianhong J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: The tongue-rolling behaviour of cows is regarded as an outward sign of stressed animals in a low welfare status. The primary aim of this observational study was to evaluate the association between the frequency of tongue-rolling behaviour and its physiological function. The secondary aim was to explore the relationship between general activities and the frequency of tongue-rolling behaviour of cows. A total of 126 scan sampling behavioural observations were collected over 7 d on 348 Holstein cows with the same lactation stage in the same barn. The tongue-rolling frequency was defined as the number of tongue-rolling observations as a percentage to the total observations per individual cow. According to their tongue-rolling frequency, the cows were grouped into the CON (no tongue-rolling), LT (frequency 1%), MT (frequency 5%), and HT (frequency 10%) groups. Six cows from each group were randomly selected for sampling. Serum samples, rumen fluid, milk yield, and background information were collected. The general behaviour data during 72 continuous hours of dairy cows, including eating time, rumination time, food time (eating time + rumination time), and lying time, were recorded by the collar sensor. RESULTS: Cortisol (P = 0.012), γ-hydroxybutyric acid (P = 0.008), epinephrine (P = 0.030), and dopamine (P = 0.047) levels were significantly higher in tongue-rolling groups than in the CON group. Cortisol levels and tongue-rolling frequency had a moderate positive correlation (linearly r = 0.363). With the increase in tongue-rolling frequency, the rumen pH decreased first and then increased (P = 0.013), comparing to the CON group. HT cows had significantly less food time than CON cows (P = 0.035). The frequency of tongue-rolling had a moderate negative relationship with rumination time (r = −0.384) and food time (r = −0.492). CONCLUSIONS: The tongue-rolling behaviour is considered as a passive coping mechanism, as the stress response in cows with high tongue-rolling frequency increased. Food intake and rumination activities were all closely related to the occurrence of tongue-rolling behaviour. BioMed Central 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10416447/ /pubmed/37563681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00906-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sun, Fuyu
Chen, Xiaoyang
Li, Yongfeng
Zhao, Guangyong
Gu, Xianhong
Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity
title Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity
title_full Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity
title_fullStr Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity
title_short Evaluation of Holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity
title_sort evaluation of holstein cows with different tongue-rolling frequencies: stress immunity, rumen environment and general behavioural activity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37563681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-023-00906-4
work_keys_str_mv AT sunfuyu evaluationofholsteincowswithdifferenttonguerollingfrequenciesstressimmunityrumenenvironmentandgeneralbehaviouralactivity
AT chenxiaoyang evaluationofholsteincowswithdifferenttonguerollingfrequenciesstressimmunityrumenenvironmentandgeneralbehaviouralactivity
AT liyongfeng evaluationofholsteincowswithdifferenttonguerollingfrequenciesstressimmunityrumenenvironmentandgeneralbehaviouralactivity
AT zhaoguangyong evaluationofholsteincowswithdifferenttonguerollingfrequenciesstressimmunityrumenenvironmentandgeneralbehaviouralactivity
AT guxianhong evaluationofholsteincowswithdifferenttonguerollingfrequenciesstressimmunityrumenenvironmentandgeneralbehaviouralactivity