Cargando…

Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are more effective if accepted by clinicians. We developed an AI-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) to facilitate vancomycin dosing. This qualitative study assesses clinicians' perceptions regarding CDSS implementation. METHODS: Thirteen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xinyan, Barreto, Erin F., Dong, Yue, Liu, Chang, Gao, Xiaolan, Tootooni, Mohammad Samie, Song, Xuan, Kashani, Kianoush B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02254-9
_version_ 1785087798943940608
author Liu, Xinyan
Barreto, Erin F.
Dong, Yue
Liu, Chang
Gao, Xiaolan
Tootooni, Mohammad Samie
Song, Xuan
Kashani, Kianoush B.
author_facet Liu, Xinyan
Barreto, Erin F.
Dong, Yue
Liu, Chang
Gao, Xiaolan
Tootooni, Mohammad Samie
Song, Xuan
Kashani, Kianoush B.
author_sort Liu, Xinyan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are more effective if accepted by clinicians. We developed an AI-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) to facilitate vancomycin dosing. This qualitative study assesses clinicians' perceptions regarding CDSS implementation. METHODS: Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with critical care pharmacists, at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), from March through April 2020. Eight clinical cases were discussed with each pharmacist (N = 104). Following initial responses, we revealed the CDSS recommendations to assess participants' reactions and feedback. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and summarized. RESULTS: The participants reported considerable time and effort invested daily in individualizing vancomycin therapy for hospitalized patients. Most pharmacists agreed that such a CDSS could favorably affect (N = 8, 62%) or enhance (9, 69%) their ability to make vancomycin dosing decisions. In case-based evaluations, pharmacists' empiric doses differed from the CDSS recommendation in most cases (88/104, 85%). Following revealing the CDSS recommendations, we noted 78% (69/88) discrepant doses. In discrepant cases, pharmacists indicated they would not alter their recommendations. The reasons for declining the CDSS recommendation were general distrust of CDSS, lack of dynamic evaluation and in-depth analysis, inability to integrate all clinical data, and lack of a risk index. CONCLUSION: While pharmacists acknowledged enthusiasm about the advantages of AI-based models to improve drug dosing, they were reluctant to integrate the tool into clinical practice. Additional research is necessary to determine the optimal approach to implementing CDSS at the point of care acceptable to clinicians and effective at improving patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02254-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104165222023-08-12 Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing Liu, Xinyan Barreto, Erin F. Dong, Yue Liu, Chang Gao, Xiaolan Tootooni, Mohammad Samie Song, Xuan Kashani, Kianoush B. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are more effective if accepted by clinicians. We developed an AI-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) to facilitate vancomycin dosing. This qualitative study assesses clinicians' perceptions regarding CDSS implementation. METHODS: Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with critical care pharmacists, at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN), from March through April 2020. Eight clinical cases were discussed with each pharmacist (N = 104). Following initial responses, we revealed the CDSS recommendations to assess participants' reactions and feedback. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and summarized. RESULTS: The participants reported considerable time and effort invested daily in individualizing vancomycin therapy for hospitalized patients. Most pharmacists agreed that such a CDSS could favorably affect (N = 8, 62%) or enhance (9, 69%) their ability to make vancomycin dosing decisions. In case-based evaluations, pharmacists' empiric doses differed from the CDSS recommendation in most cases (88/104, 85%). Following revealing the CDSS recommendations, we noted 78% (69/88) discrepant doses. In discrepant cases, pharmacists indicated they would not alter their recommendations. The reasons for declining the CDSS recommendation were general distrust of CDSS, lack of dynamic evaluation and in-depth analysis, inability to integrate all clinical data, and lack of a risk index. CONCLUSION: While pharmacists acknowledged enthusiasm about the advantages of AI-based models to improve drug dosing, they were reluctant to integrate the tool into clinical practice. Additional research is necessary to determine the optimal approach to implementing CDSS at the point of care acceptable to clinicians and effective at improving patient outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-023-02254-9. BioMed Central 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10416522/ /pubmed/37568134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02254-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Xinyan
Barreto, Erin F.
Dong, Yue
Liu, Chang
Gao, Xiaolan
Tootooni, Mohammad Samie
Song, Xuan
Kashani, Kianoush B.
Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing
title Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing
title_full Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing
title_fullStr Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing
title_full_unstemmed Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing
title_short Discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support Systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing
title_sort discrepancy between perceptions and acceptance of clinical decision support systems: implementation of artificial intelligence for vancomycin dosing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02254-9
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxinyan discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing
AT barretoerinf discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing
AT dongyue discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing
AT liuchang discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing
AT gaoxiaolan discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing
AT tootoonimohammadsamie discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing
AT songxuan discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing
AT kashanikianoushb discrepancybetweenperceptionsandacceptanceofclinicaldecisionsupportsystemsimplementationofartificialintelligenceforvancomycindosing