Cargando…
Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option
Tools for rearing hematophagous insects, such as mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae), in an insectary are essential for research and operational evaluations in vector biology and control. There is an abundance of low-cost options for practitioners without conventional infrastructure. However, few midran...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iead072 |
_version_ | 1785087807446843392 |
---|---|
author | Dewsnup, M Andrew Faraji, Ary White, Gregory S Bibbs, Christopher S |
author_facet | Dewsnup, M Andrew Faraji, Ary White, Gregory S Bibbs, Christopher S |
author_sort | Dewsnup, M Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tools for rearing hematophagous insects, such as mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae), in an insectary are essential for research and operational evaluations in vector biology and control. There is an abundance of low-cost options for practitioners without conventional infrastructure. However, few midrange options exist that provide a balance of efficiency and low material waste. We present here a reproducible design for an electrically powered blood-feeding device that offers long-term reusability, low material waste, and customizability for different species or experiments. The limitation is the requirement for electricity, but the gain is a simple, low-skill device that can be modified as needed. To validate the design, assessments of feeding angle and blood-feeding success were compared between the Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District artificial membrane feeder (SLAM) and a commercial system (Hemotek). Engorgement in Aedes aegypti (80–90%), Culex pipiens (50–80%), and Culex tarsalis (30–75%) was similar between the 2 units, resulting in nearly identical fecundity outcomes between devices. Additionally, 45° angles were more successful, generally, than presenting the feeders flat or vertical to the mosquitoes (df(3,48), P = 1.014 × 10(−15)). This angle is simple to present with the SLAM device. Materials for in-house reproduction of the SLAM system are now widely available in regions with access to e-commerce and shipped goods. This results in a device schematic that should fit well into a relatively modular, do-it-yourself paradigm where the practitioner needs only to assemble some materials without complex engineering. This article provides schematics, cost comparison, and validation of the in-house-made SLAM system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10416558 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104165582023-08-12 Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option Dewsnup, M Andrew Faraji, Ary White, Gregory S Bibbs, Christopher S J Insect Sci Research Tools for rearing hematophagous insects, such as mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae), in an insectary are essential for research and operational evaluations in vector biology and control. There is an abundance of low-cost options for practitioners without conventional infrastructure. However, few midrange options exist that provide a balance of efficiency and low material waste. We present here a reproducible design for an electrically powered blood-feeding device that offers long-term reusability, low material waste, and customizability for different species or experiments. The limitation is the requirement for electricity, but the gain is a simple, low-skill device that can be modified as needed. To validate the design, assessments of feeding angle and blood-feeding success were compared between the Salt Lake City Mosquito Abatement District artificial membrane feeder (SLAM) and a commercial system (Hemotek). Engorgement in Aedes aegypti (80–90%), Culex pipiens (50–80%), and Culex tarsalis (30–75%) was similar between the 2 units, resulting in nearly identical fecundity outcomes between devices. Additionally, 45° angles were more successful, generally, than presenting the feeders flat or vertical to the mosquitoes (df(3,48), P = 1.014 × 10(−15)). This angle is simple to present with the SLAM device. Materials for in-house reproduction of the SLAM system are now widely available in regions with access to e-commerce and shipped goods. This results in a device schematic that should fit well into a relatively modular, do-it-yourself paradigm where the practitioner needs only to assemble some materials without complex engineering. This article provides schematics, cost comparison, and validation of the in-house-made SLAM system. Oxford University Press 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10416558/ /pubmed/37565771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iead072 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Dewsnup, M Andrew Faraji, Ary White, Gregory S Bibbs, Christopher S Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option |
title | Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option |
title_full | Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option |
title_fullStr | Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option |
title_full_unstemmed | Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option |
title_short | Do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option |
title_sort | do it yourself: fabricating and evaluating a mosquito (diptera: culicidae) blood-feeding device to replace a commercial option |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416558/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iead072 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewsnupmandrew doityourselffabricatingandevaluatingamosquitodipteraculicidaebloodfeedingdevicetoreplaceacommercialoption AT farajiary doityourselffabricatingandevaluatingamosquitodipteraculicidaebloodfeedingdevicetoreplaceacommercialoption AT whitegregorys doityourselffabricatingandevaluatingamosquitodipteraculicidaebloodfeedingdevicetoreplaceacommercialoption AT bibbschristophers doityourselffabricatingandevaluatingamosquitodipteraculicidaebloodfeedingdevicetoreplaceacommercialoption |