Cargando…

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a classic surgical procedure for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Haiwei, Song, Yuke, Weng, Rui, Tian, Han, Yuan, Jiayao, Li, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221142545
_version_ 1785087819872468992
author Guo, Haiwei
Song, Yuke
Weng, Rui
Tian, Han
Yuan, Jiayao
Li, Ying
author_facet Guo, Haiwei
Song, Yuke
Weng, Rui
Tian, Han
Yuan, Jiayao
Li, Ying
author_sort Guo, Haiwei
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a classic surgical procedure for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) can also achieve adequate decompression and interbody fusion. However, whether Endo-TLIF is superior to MIS-TLIF has not been adequately studied. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the treatment difference between Endo-TLIF vs MIS-TLIF. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies to compare the clinical outcomes and complications associated with Endo-TLIF vs. MIS-TLIF for the treatment of LDD. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases for studies published up to April 1, 2022. Both retrospective and prospective studies that compared between Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF were included. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies involving 581 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. Endo-TLIF significantly prolonged the operation time, but reduced the blood loss amount and length of hospital stay. Moreover, Endo-TLIF was superior to MIS-TLIF on relief of back pain and functional recovery in the early postoperative period. However, there were no significantly differences in long-term clinical outcomes, fusion rate and incidence of complications between Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Endo-TLIF was similar to MIS-TLIF in the long-term clinical outcomes, fusion and complication rates. Endo-TLIF prolongs the operation time, but shortens the length of hospital stay, and has the advantages of less surgical trauma, less blood loss, faster recovery, and early postoperative back pain relief.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416606
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104166062023-08-12 Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Guo, Haiwei Song, Yuke Weng, Rui Tian, Han Yuan, Jiayao Li, Ying Global Spine J Review Articles STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) is a classic surgical procedure for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD). With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) can also achieve adequate decompression and interbody fusion. However, whether Endo-TLIF is superior to MIS-TLIF has not been adequately studied. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the treatment difference between Endo-TLIF vs MIS-TLIF. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies to compare the clinical outcomes and complications associated with Endo-TLIF vs. MIS-TLIF for the treatment of LDD. A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus databases for studies published up to April 1, 2022. Both retrospective and prospective studies that compared between Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF were included. RESULTS: A total of 8 studies involving 581 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. Endo-TLIF significantly prolonged the operation time, but reduced the blood loss amount and length of hospital stay. Moreover, Endo-TLIF was superior to MIS-TLIF on relief of back pain and functional recovery in the early postoperative period. However, there were no significantly differences in long-term clinical outcomes, fusion rate and incidence of complications between Endo-TLIF and MIS-TLIF. CONCLUSIONS: Endo-TLIF was similar to MIS-TLIF in the long-term clinical outcomes, fusion and complication rates. Endo-TLIF prolongs the operation time, but shortens the length of hospital stay, and has the advantages of less surgical trauma, less blood loss, faster recovery, and early postoperative back pain relief. SAGE Publications 2022-11-29 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10416606/ /pubmed/36447426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221142545 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Review Articles
Guo, Haiwei
Song, Yuke
Weng, Rui
Tian, Han
Yuan, Jiayao
Li, Ying
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications Between Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes and complications between endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416606/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36447426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21925682221142545
work_keys_str_mv AT guohaiwei comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsbetweenendoscopicandminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT songyuke comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsbetweenendoscopicandminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wengrui comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsbetweenendoscopicandminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tianhan comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsbetweenendoscopicandminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yuanjiayao comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsbetweenendoscopicandminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liying comparisonofclinicaloutcomesandcomplicationsbetweenendoscopicandminimallyinvasivetransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionforlumbardegenerativediseasesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis