Cargando…

Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting

OBJECTIVE: Femoral head necrosis (FHN) affects mostly young and active people. The most common operative therapy is core decompression (CD) with optional cancellous bone grafting (CBG). Because little information is available on the long-term results of these procedures, we investigated the effectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woerner, Michael, Voelkl, Korbinian, Bliemel, Christopher, Ferner, Felix, Weber, Markus, Renkawitz, Tobias, Grifka, Joachim, Craiovan, Benjamin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37585739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231190453
_version_ 1785087831947870208
author Woerner, Michael
Voelkl, Korbinian
Bliemel, Christopher
Ferner, Felix
Weber, Markus
Renkawitz, Tobias
Grifka, Joachim
Craiovan, Benjamin
author_facet Woerner, Michael
Voelkl, Korbinian
Bliemel, Christopher
Ferner, Felix
Weber, Markus
Renkawitz, Tobias
Grifka, Joachim
Craiovan, Benjamin
author_sort Woerner, Michael
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Femoral head necrosis (FHN) affects mostly young and active people. The most common operative therapy is core decompression (CD) with optional cancellous bone grafting (CBG). Because little information is available on the long-term results of these procedures, we investigated the effectiveness of CD and CD + CBG in patients with ARCO stage II FHN in terms of postoperative pain, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures (Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EuroQol 5D, and Short Form 36 Questionnaire), and disease progression. METHODS: We retrospectively compared 11 patients treated with CD alone 48.0 months (range, 26.3–68.5 months) postoperatively versus 11 patients treated with CD + CBG 69.2 months (range, 38.0–92.9 months) postoperatively. All patients were assessed according to a routine clinical protocol involving a clinical examination, questionnaires, and radiological imaging (X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging). RESULTS: The clinical and radiological results showed no significant differences between the two groups. Both interventions demonstrated equal results according to clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our data may encourage application of the less invasive technique of CD alone without CBG, which is more surgically demanding. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to clarify the risk factors for therapy failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104166612023-08-12 Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting Woerner, Michael Voelkl, Korbinian Bliemel, Christopher Ferner, Felix Weber, Markus Renkawitz, Tobias Grifka, Joachim Craiovan, Benjamin J Int Med Res Retrospective Clinical Research Report OBJECTIVE: Femoral head necrosis (FHN) affects mostly young and active people. The most common operative therapy is core decompression (CD) with optional cancellous bone grafting (CBG). Because little information is available on the long-term results of these procedures, we investigated the effectiveness of CD and CD + CBG in patients with ARCO stage II FHN in terms of postoperative pain, range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures (Harris Hip Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EuroQol 5D, and Short Form 36 Questionnaire), and disease progression. METHODS: We retrospectively compared 11 patients treated with CD alone 48.0 months (range, 26.3–68.5 months) postoperatively versus 11 patients treated with CD + CBG 69.2 months (range, 38.0–92.9 months) postoperatively. All patients were assessed according to a routine clinical protocol involving a clinical examination, questionnaires, and radiological imaging (X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging). RESULTS: The clinical and radiological results showed no significant differences between the two groups. Both interventions demonstrated equal results according to clinical scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our data may encourage application of the less invasive technique of CD alone without CBG, which is more surgically demanding. Further prospective studies with longer follow-up are necessary to clarify the risk factors for therapy failure. SAGE Publications 2023-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC10416661/ /pubmed/37585739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231190453 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Woerner, Michael
Voelkl, Korbinian
Bliemel, Christopher
Ferner, Felix
Weber, Markus
Renkawitz, Tobias
Grifka, Joachim
Craiovan, Benjamin
Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
title Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
title_full Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
title_fullStr Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
title_short Comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
title_sort comparison of two joint-preserving treatments for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: core decompression and core decompression with additional cancellous bone grafting
topic Retrospective Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37585739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605231190453
work_keys_str_mv AT woernermichael comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting
AT voelklkorbinian comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting
AT bliemelchristopher comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting
AT fernerfelix comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting
AT webermarkus comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting
AT renkawitztobias comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting
AT grifkajoachim comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting
AT craiovanbenjamin comparisonoftwojointpreservingtreatmentsforosteonecrosisofthefemoralheadcoredecompressionandcoredecompressionwithadditionalcancellousbonegrafting