Cargando…

A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness

Background: Er:YAG laser is widely used in debonding of all-ceramic veneers nowadays. However, the data about laser parameters in all-ceramic crown removal is limited. The aim of this preliminary study was to determine the most appropriate laser parameters at safe heat transmission values ​​for lith...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gozneli, Rifat, Sendurur, Tansu, Silahtar, Esra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575279
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.85722
_version_ 1785087843271442432
author Gozneli, Rifat
Sendurur, Tansu
Silahtar, Esra
author_facet Gozneli, Rifat
Sendurur, Tansu
Silahtar, Esra
author_sort Gozneli, Rifat
collection PubMed
description Background: Er:YAG laser is widely used in debonding of all-ceramic veneers nowadays. However, the data about laser parameters in all-ceramic crown removal is limited. The aim of this preliminary study was to determine the most appropriate laser parameters at safe heat transmission values ​​for lithium disilicate crowns in different thicknesses. Methods: Twenty-seven intact premolars were prepared to fabricate lithium disilicate CAD/CAM full-coverage crowns in three different thicknesses: 1, 1.5 mm, and mixed thickness (n=9). Each thickness group was divided into 3 subgroups and subjected to Er:YAG laser at different wattages (5, 5.6 and 5.9 W) to determine the appropriate wattage for each thickness. The removal time and temperature rise values were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to evaluate any significant differences in removal time, Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, and the Pearson chi-square test for temperature rise over the critical value (p<0.05). Results: Laser irradiation at 5 W was safe and efficient for 1 mm thickness, while not efficient for others. Laser application at 5.9 W was efficient for all thicknesses, but, not safe for 1 mm thickness. The statistically significant difference in removal time was only between 5 W and 5.9 W groups (p=0.035). Pearson's chi-square test revealed that the temperature rise after 5.9 W laser application was significantly different from 5 W in 1 mm thickness group (p=0.043). Conclusion: Er:YAG laser lithium disilicate crown removal is an effective and safe method using laser settings appropriate for crown thickness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104167132023-08-12 A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness Gozneli, Rifat Sendurur, Tansu Silahtar, Esra Int J Med Sci Research Paper Background: Er:YAG laser is widely used in debonding of all-ceramic veneers nowadays. However, the data about laser parameters in all-ceramic crown removal is limited. The aim of this preliminary study was to determine the most appropriate laser parameters at safe heat transmission values ​​for lithium disilicate crowns in different thicknesses. Methods: Twenty-seven intact premolars were prepared to fabricate lithium disilicate CAD/CAM full-coverage crowns in three different thicknesses: 1, 1.5 mm, and mixed thickness (n=9). Each thickness group was divided into 3 subgroups and subjected to Er:YAG laser at different wattages (5, 5.6 and 5.9 W) to determine the appropriate wattage for each thickness. The removal time and temperature rise values were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to evaluate any significant differences in removal time, Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, and the Pearson chi-square test for temperature rise over the critical value (p<0.05). Results: Laser irradiation at 5 W was safe and efficient for 1 mm thickness, while not efficient for others. Laser application at 5.9 W was efficient for all thicknesses, but, not safe for 1 mm thickness. The statistically significant difference in removal time was only between 5 W and 5.9 W groups (p=0.035). Pearson's chi-square test revealed that the temperature rise after 5.9 W laser application was significantly different from 5 W in 1 mm thickness group (p=0.043). Conclusion: Er:YAG laser lithium disilicate crown removal is an effective and safe method using laser settings appropriate for crown thickness. Ivyspring International Publisher 2023-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10416713/ /pubmed/37575279 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.85722 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Gozneli, Rifat
Sendurur, Tansu
Silahtar, Esra
A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness
title A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness
title_full A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness
title_fullStr A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness
title_full_unstemmed A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness
title_short A Preliminary Study in Er:YAG Laser Debonding of Lithium Disilicate Crowns: Laser Power Setting vs Crown Thickness
title_sort preliminary study in er:yag laser debonding of lithium disilicate crowns: laser power setting vs crown thickness
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575279
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijms.85722
work_keys_str_mv AT goznelirifat apreliminarystudyineryaglaserdebondingoflithiumdisilicatecrownslaserpowersettingvscrownthickness
AT sendururtansu apreliminarystudyineryaglaserdebondingoflithiumdisilicatecrownslaserpowersettingvscrownthickness
AT silahtaresra apreliminarystudyineryaglaserdebondingoflithiumdisilicatecrownslaserpowersettingvscrownthickness
AT goznelirifat preliminarystudyineryaglaserdebondingoflithiumdisilicatecrownslaserpowersettingvscrownthickness
AT sendururtansu preliminarystudyineryaglaserdebondingoflithiumdisilicatecrownslaserpowersettingvscrownthickness
AT silahtaresra preliminarystudyineryaglaserdebondingoflithiumdisilicatecrownslaserpowersettingvscrownthickness