Cargando…

Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples

BACKGROUND: Internalizing (anxiety and mood) disorders (INTD) commonly co-occur (are “comorbid”) with alcohol use disorder (AUD). The literature suggests that excessive alcohol use aimed at coping with INTD symptoms is, at best, a partial explanation for the high comorbidity rates observed. We hypot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anker, Justin J., Thuras, Paul, Shuai, Ruichong, Hogarth, Lee, Kushner, Matt G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37115410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.15036
_version_ 1785087865403736064
author Anker, Justin J.
Thuras, Paul
Shuai, Ruichong
Hogarth, Lee
Kushner, Matt G.
author_facet Anker, Justin J.
Thuras, Paul
Shuai, Ruichong
Hogarth, Lee
Kushner, Matt G.
author_sort Anker, Justin J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Internalizing (anxiety and mood) disorders (INTD) commonly co-occur (are “comorbid”) with alcohol use disorder (AUD). The literature suggests that excessive alcohol use aimed at coping with INTD symptoms is, at best, a partial explanation for the high comorbidity rates observed. We hypothesized that individuals with INTD experience greater susceptibility to developing AUD symptoms due to the partially shared neurobiological dysfunctions underlying both conditions. We probe this hypothesis by testing the prediction that, after accounting for the volume of alcohol intake, individuals with INTD experience higher levels of alcohol-related symptoms. METHODS: Data from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol-Related Conditions (NESARC) Wave 3 were used for the primary analyses, and NESARC Wave 1 data were used for independent replication analyses. Individuals who reported any alcohol use in the prior year were categorized as: (1) never having had an INTD diagnosis (“INTD-Never”); (2) having a remitted INTD diagnosis only (“INTD-Remitted”); or (3) having current INTD diagnosis (“INTD-Current”). Between-group contrasts of alcohol-related symptoms controlled for total alcohol intake (past year), drinking pattern (e.g., binging) and variables previously shown to mark exaggerated AUD symptoms relative to drinking amount (e.g., SES, gender, and family history). RESULTS: With all covariates in the model, individuals in the INTD-Current group and the INTD-Remitted group reported significantly greater alcohol-related symptoms than those in the INTD-Never group but did not themselves differ in level of alcohol-related symptoms. These results were replicated in the NESARC 1 dataset. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with INTD experience more alcohol-related symptoms than those who drink at the same level. While considering other explanations, we argue that this “harm paradox” is best explained by the view that INTD confers a neurobiologically mediated susceptibility to the development of AUD symptoms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104168092023-08-11 Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples Anker, Justin J. Thuras, Paul Shuai, Ruichong Hogarth, Lee Kushner, Matt G. Alcohol (Hoboken) Article BACKGROUND: Internalizing (anxiety and mood) disorders (INTD) commonly co-occur (are “comorbid”) with alcohol use disorder (AUD). The literature suggests that excessive alcohol use aimed at coping with INTD symptoms is, at best, a partial explanation for the high comorbidity rates observed. We hypothesized that individuals with INTD experience greater susceptibility to developing AUD symptoms due to the partially shared neurobiological dysfunctions underlying both conditions. We probe this hypothesis by testing the prediction that, after accounting for the volume of alcohol intake, individuals with INTD experience higher levels of alcohol-related symptoms. METHODS: Data from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol-Related Conditions (NESARC) Wave 3 were used for the primary analyses, and NESARC Wave 1 data were used for independent replication analyses. Individuals who reported any alcohol use in the prior year were categorized as: (1) never having had an INTD diagnosis (“INTD-Never”); (2) having a remitted INTD diagnosis only (“INTD-Remitted”); or (3) having current INTD diagnosis (“INTD-Current”). Between-group contrasts of alcohol-related symptoms controlled for total alcohol intake (past year), drinking pattern (e.g., binging) and variables previously shown to mark exaggerated AUD symptoms relative to drinking amount (e.g., SES, gender, and family history). RESULTS: With all covariates in the model, individuals in the INTD-Current group and the INTD-Remitted group reported significantly greater alcohol-related symptoms than those in the INTD-Never group but did not themselves differ in level of alcohol-related symptoms. These results were replicated in the NESARC 1 dataset. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with INTD experience more alcohol-related symptoms than those who drink at the same level. While considering other explanations, we argue that this “harm paradox” is best explained by the view that INTD confers a neurobiologically mediated susceptibility to the development of AUD symptoms. 2023-04 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10416809/ /pubmed/37115410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.15036 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Article
Anker, Justin J.
Thuras, Paul
Shuai, Ruichong
Hogarth, Lee
Kushner, Matt G.
Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples
title Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples
title_full Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples
title_fullStr Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples
title_short Evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: Test and replication in two independent community samples
title_sort evidence for an alcohol-related “harm paradox” in individuals with internalizing disorders: test and replication in two independent community samples
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37115410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/acer.15036
work_keys_str_mv AT ankerjustinj evidenceforanalcoholrelatedharmparadoxinindividualswithinternalizingdisorderstestandreplicationintwoindependentcommunitysamples
AT thuraspaul evidenceforanalcoholrelatedharmparadoxinindividualswithinternalizingdisorderstestandreplicationintwoindependentcommunitysamples
AT shuairuichong evidenceforanalcoholrelatedharmparadoxinindividualswithinternalizingdisorderstestandreplicationintwoindependentcommunitysamples
AT hogarthlee evidenceforanalcoholrelatedharmparadoxinindividualswithinternalizingdisorderstestandreplicationintwoindependentcommunitysamples
AT kushnermattg evidenceforanalcoholrelatedharmparadoxinindividualswithinternalizingdisorderstestandreplicationintwoindependentcommunitysamples