Cargando…

Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis

Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guichoud, Yohan, El Ezzi, Oumama, de Buys Roessingh, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152479
_version_ 1785087877035589632
author Guichoud, Yohan
El Ezzi, Oumama
de Buys Roessingh, Anthony
author_facet Guichoud, Yohan
El Ezzi, Oumama
de Buys Roessingh, Anthony
author_sort Guichoud, Yohan
collection PubMed
description Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or palate on routine morphologic ultrasonography. In this retrospective observational study, we compared antenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 233 patients followed in our unit. We classified our patients according to the Kernahan and Stark’s classification system: Group 1: facial cleft including labial and labio-maxillary clefts; Group 2: facial cleft including total, subtotal and submucous palatal clefts; Group 3: labio-maxillary-palatal clefts. Out of 233 patients, 104 were antenatally diagnosed with a facial cleft, i.e., an overall detection rate of 44.6%. The diagnosis was confirmed at birth in 65 of these patients, i.e., an overall accuracy of 62.5%. Of the 67 children (29.2%) in Group 1, the screening detection rate was 58.2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 48.7%. Of the 97 children (41.6%) in Group 2, the screening detection rate was 2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 50%. Of the 69 children (29.6%) in Group 3, the screening detection rate was 91.3% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 71.4%. Our study demonstrates a relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in prenatal ultrasound, where the diagnosis was inaccurate in one third to one half of patients. It showed great variability in the screening detection rate depending on the diagnostic group observed, as well as a low rate of detection of palatal clefts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10416856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104168562023-08-12 Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis Guichoud, Yohan El Ezzi, Oumama de Buys Roessingh, Anthony Diagnostics (Basel) Article Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or palate on routine morphologic ultrasonography. In this retrospective observational study, we compared antenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 233 patients followed in our unit. We classified our patients according to the Kernahan and Stark’s classification system: Group 1: facial cleft including labial and labio-maxillary clefts; Group 2: facial cleft including total, subtotal and submucous palatal clefts; Group 3: labio-maxillary-palatal clefts. Out of 233 patients, 104 were antenatally diagnosed with a facial cleft, i.e., an overall detection rate of 44.6%. The diagnosis was confirmed at birth in 65 of these patients, i.e., an overall accuracy of 62.5%. Of the 67 children (29.2%) in Group 1, the screening detection rate was 58.2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 48.7%. Of the 97 children (41.6%) in Group 2, the screening detection rate was 2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 50%. Of the 69 children (29.6%) in Group 3, the screening detection rate was 91.3% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 71.4%. Our study demonstrates a relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in prenatal ultrasound, where the diagnosis was inaccurate in one third to one half of patients. It showed great variability in the screening detection rate depending on the diagnostic group observed, as well as a low rate of detection of palatal clefts. MDPI 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10416856/ /pubmed/37568842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152479 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Guichoud, Yohan
El Ezzi, Oumama
de Buys Roessingh, Anthony
Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
title Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
title_full Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
title_fullStr Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
title_short Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
title_sort cleft lip and palate antenatal diagnosis: a swiss university center performance analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568842
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152479
work_keys_str_mv AT guichoudyohan cleftlipandpalateantenataldiagnosisaswissuniversitycenterperformanceanalysis
AT elezzioumama cleftlipandpalateantenataldiagnosisaswissuniversitycenterperformanceanalysis
AT debuysroessinghanthony cleftlipandpalateantenataldiagnosisaswissuniversitycenterperformanceanalysis