Cargando…
Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis
Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or p...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152479 |
_version_ | 1785087877035589632 |
---|---|
author | Guichoud, Yohan El Ezzi, Oumama de Buys Roessingh, Anthony |
author_facet | Guichoud, Yohan El Ezzi, Oumama de Buys Roessingh, Anthony |
author_sort | Guichoud, Yohan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or palate on routine morphologic ultrasonography. In this retrospective observational study, we compared antenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 233 patients followed in our unit. We classified our patients according to the Kernahan and Stark’s classification system: Group 1: facial cleft including labial and labio-maxillary clefts; Group 2: facial cleft including total, subtotal and submucous palatal clefts; Group 3: labio-maxillary-palatal clefts. Out of 233 patients, 104 were antenatally diagnosed with a facial cleft, i.e., an overall detection rate of 44.6%. The diagnosis was confirmed at birth in 65 of these patients, i.e., an overall accuracy of 62.5%. Of the 67 children (29.2%) in Group 1, the screening detection rate was 58.2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 48.7%. Of the 97 children (41.6%) in Group 2, the screening detection rate was 2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 50%. Of the 69 children (29.6%) in Group 3, the screening detection rate was 91.3% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 71.4%. Our study demonstrates a relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in prenatal ultrasound, where the diagnosis was inaccurate in one third to one half of patients. It showed great variability in the screening detection rate depending on the diagnostic group observed, as well as a low rate of detection of palatal clefts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10416856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104168562023-08-12 Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis Guichoud, Yohan El Ezzi, Oumama de Buys Roessingh, Anthony Diagnostics (Basel) Article Precision of cleft lip and/or palate antenatal diagnosis plays a significant role in counselling, neonatal care, surgical strategies and psychological support of the family. This study aims to measure the accuracy of antenatal diagnosis in our institution and the detection rate of cleft lip and/or palate on routine morphologic ultrasonography. In this retrospective observational study, we compared antenatal and postnatal diagnosis of 233 patients followed in our unit. We classified our patients according to the Kernahan and Stark’s classification system: Group 1: facial cleft including labial and labio-maxillary clefts; Group 2: facial cleft including total, subtotal and submucous palatal clefts; Group 3: labio-maxillary-palatal clefts. Out of 233 patients, 104 were antenatally diagnosed with a facial cleft, i.e., an overall detection rate of 44.6%. The diagnosis was confirmed at birth in 65 of these patients, i.e., an overall accuracy of 62.5%. Of the 67 children (29.2%) in Group 1, the screening detection rate was 58.2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 48.7%. Of the 97 children (41.6%) in Group 2, the screening detection rate was 2% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 50%. Of the 69 children (29.6%) in Group 3, the screening detection rate was 91.3% with an antenatal diagnostic accuracy of 71.4%. Our study demonstrates a relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in prenatal ultrasound, where the diagnosis was inaccurate in one third to one half of patients. It showed great variability in the screening detection rate depending on the diagnostic group observed, as well as a low rate of detection of palatal clefts. MDPI 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10416856/ /pubmed/37568842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152479 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Guichoud, Yohan El Ezzi, Oumama de Buys Roessingh, Anthony Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis |
title | Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis |
title_full | Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis |
title_fullStr | Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis |
title_short | Cleft Lip and Palate Antenatal Diagnosis: A Swiss University Center Performance Analysis |
title_sort | cleft lip and palate antenatal diagnosis: a swiss university center performance analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10416856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152479 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guichoudyohan cleftlipandpalateantenataldiagnosisaswissuniversitycenterperformanceanalysis AT elezzioumama cleftlipandpalateantenataldiagnosisaswissuniversitycenterperformanceanalysis AT debuysroessinghanthony cleftlipandpalateantenataldiagnosisaswissuniversitycenterperformanceanalysis |