Cargando…

Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage

PURPOSE: In the Emergency Departments (ED) the current triage systems that are been implemented are based completely on medical education and the perception of each health professional who is in charge. On the other hand, cutting-edge technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be incorporated into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlafti, Eleni, Anagnostis, Athanasios, Simou, Theodora, Kollatou, Angeliki Sevasti, Paramythiotis, Daniel, Kaiafa, Georgia, Didaggelos, Triantafyllos, Savvopoulos, Christos, Fyntanidou, Varvara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Vilnius University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575380
http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2023.30.1.2
_version_ 1785087919519694848
author Karlafti, Eleni
Anagnostis, Athanasios
Simou, Theodora
Kollatou, Angeliki Sevasti
Paramythiotis, Daniel
Kaiafa, Georgia
Didaggelos, Triantafyllos
Savvopoulos, Christos
Fyntanidou, Varvara
author_facet Karlafti, Eleni
Anagnostis, Athanasios
Simou, Theodora
Kollatou, Angeliki Sevasti
Paramythiotis, Daniel
Kaiafa, Georgia
Didaggelos, Triantafyllos
Savvopoulos, Christos
Fyntanidou, Varvara
author_sort Karlafti, Eleni
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: In the Emergency Departments (ED) the current triage systems that are been implemented are based completely on medical education and the perception of each health professional who is in charge. On the other hand, cutting-edge technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be incorporated into healthcare systems, supporting the healthcare professionals’ decisions, and augmenting the performance of triage systems. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficiency of AI to support triage in ED. PATIENTS–METHODS: The study included 332 patients from whom 23 different variables related to their condition were collected. From the processing of patient data for input variables, it emerged that the average age was 56.4 ± 21.1 years and 50.6% were male. The waiting time had an average of 59.7 ± 56.3 minutes while 3.9% ± 0.1% entered the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In addition, qualitative variables related to the patient’s history and admission clinics were used. As target variables were taken the days of stay in the hospital, which were on average 1.8 ± 5.9, and the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) for which the following distribution applies: ESI: 1, patients: 2; ESI: 2, patients: 18; ESI: 3, patients: 197; ESI: 4, patients: 73; ESI: 5, patients: 42. RESULTS: To create an automatic patient screening classifier, a neural network was developed, which was trained based on the data, so that it could predict each patient’s ESI based on input variables. The classifier achieved an overall accuracy (F1 score) of 72.2% even though there was an imbalance in the classes. CONCLUSIONS: The creation and implementation of an AI model for the automatic prediction of ESI, highlighted the possibility of systems capable of supporting healthcare professionals in the decision-making process. The accuracy of the classifier has not reached satisfactory levels of certainty, however, the performance of similar models can increase sharply with the collection of more data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Vilnius University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104170172023-08-12 Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage Karlafti, Eleni Anagnostis, Athanasios Simou, Theodora Kollatou, Angeliki Sevasti Paramythiotis, Daniel Kaiafa, Georgia Didaggelos, Triantafyllos Savvopoulos, Christos Fyntanidou, Varvara Acta Med Litu Research Papers PURPOSE: In the Emergency Departments (ED) the current triage systems that are been implemented are based completely on medical education and the perception of each health professional who is in charge. On the other hand, cutting-edge technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be incorporated into healthcare systems, supporting the healthcare professionals’ decisions, and augmenting the performance of triage systems. The aim of the study is to investigate the efficiency of AI to support triage in ED. PATIENTS–METHODS: The study included 332 patients from whom 23 different variables related to their condition were collected. From the processing of patient data for input variables, it emerged that the average age was 56.4 ± 21.1 years and 50.6% were male. The waiting time had an average of 59.7 ± 56.3 minutes while 3.9% ± 0.1% entered the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). In addition, qualitative variables related to the patient’s history and admission clinics were used. As target variables were taken the days of stay in the hospital, which were on average 1.8 ± 5.9, and the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) for which the following distribution applies: ESI: 1, patients: 2; ESI: 2, patients: 18; ESI: 3, patients: 197; ESI: 4, patients: 73; ESI: 5, patients: 42. RESULTS: To create an automatic patient screening classifier, a neural network was developed, which was trained based on the data, so that it could predict each patient’s ESI based on input variables. The classifier achieved an overall accuracy (F1 score) of 72.2% even though there was an imbalance in the classes. CONCLUSIONS: The creation and implementation of an AI model for the automatic prediction of ESI, highlighted the possibility of systems capable of supporting healthcare professionals in the decision-making process. The accuracy of the classifier has not reached satisfactory levels of certainty, however, the performance of similar models can increase sharply with the collection of more data. Vilnius University Press 2023 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10417017/ /pubmed/37575380 http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2023.30.1.2 Text en Copyright © 2022 Eleni Karlafti, Athanasios Anagnostis, Theodora Simou, Angeliki Sevasti Kollatou, Daniel Paramythiotis, Georgia Kaiafa, Triantafyllos Didaggelos, Christos Savvopoulos, Varvara Fyntanidou. Published by Vilnius University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Karlafti, Eleni
Anagnostis, Athanasios
Simou, Theodora
Kollatou, Angeliki Sevasti
Paramythiotis, Daniel
Kaiafa, Georgia
Didaggelos, Triantafyllos
Savvopoulos, Christos
Fyntanidou, Varvara
Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage
title Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage
title_full Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage
title_fullStr Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage
title_full_unstemmed Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage
title_short Support Systems of Clinical Decisions in the Triage of the Emergency Department Using Artificial Intelligence: The Efficiency to Support Triage
title_sort support systems of clinical decisions in the triage of the emergency department using artificial intelligence: the efficiency to support triage
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37575380
http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Amed.2023.30.1.2
work_keys_str_mv AT karlaftieleni supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT anagnostisathanasios supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT simoutheodora supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT kollatouangelikisevasti supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT paramythiotisdaniel supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT kaiafageorgia supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT didaggelostriantafyllos supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT savvopouloschristos supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage
AT fyntanidouvarvara supportsystemsofclinicaldecisionsinthetriageoftheemergencydepartmentusingartificialintelligencetheefficiencytosupporttriage