Cargando…

Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study

BACKGROUND: The first‐line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a combination of one targeted therapy agent and a chemotherapy doublet. Whether bevacizumab or anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is the more effective addition to a chemot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liang, Yi‐Hsin, Chen, Kuo‐Hsing, Shao, Yu‐Yun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37325970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6196
_version_ 1785087937711439872
author Liang, Yi‐Hsin
Chen, Kuo‐Hsing
Shao, Yu‐Yun
author_facet Liang, Yi‐Hsin
Chen, Kuo‐Hsing
Shao, Yu‐Yun
author_sort Liang, Yi‐Hsin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The first‐line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a combination of one targeted therapy agent and a chemotherapy doublet. Whether bevacizumab or anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is the more effective addition to a chemotherapy doublet as the first‐line treatment for inoperable KRAS wild‐type mCRC remains controversial in prior clinical trials. Moreover, the association between the sidedness of primary tumors and the efficacy of anti‐EGFR mAb needs to be addressed. METHODS: We established a cohort of patients with KRAS wild‐type mCRC who were treated with first‐line targeted therapy plus doublet chemotherapy between 2013 and 2018 using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Secondary surgery was defined as either resection of primary tumors, liver metastases, lung metastases, or radiofrequency ablation. RESULTS: A total of 6482 patients were included; bevacizumab and anti‐EGFR mAb were the first‐line targeted therapies in 3334 (51.4%) and 3148 (48.6%) patients, respectively. Compared with those who received bevacizumab, patients who received anti‐EGFR mAb exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS; median, 23.1 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.012) and time to treatment failure (TTF; median, 11.3 vs. 10 months, p < 0.001). Among left‐sided primary tumors, the OS and TTF benefits of anti‐EGFR mAb remained. Among right‐sided primary tumors, the OS and TTF were similar regardless of the type of targeted therapy. In multivariate analyses, first‐line anti‐EGFR mAb therapy remained an independent predictor of longer OS and TTF for left‐sided primary tumors. Patients who received anti‐EGFR mAb were more likely to receive secondary surgery (29.6% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.0001) than patients who received bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: For patients who received first‐line doublet chemotherapy for KRAS wild‐type mCRC, adding anti‐EGFR mAb was associated with significantly longer OS and TTF, especially for left‐sided primary tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104170872023-08-12 Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study Liang, Yi‐Hsin Chen, Kuo‐Hsing Shao, Yu‐Yun Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The first‐line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a combination of one targeted therapy agent and a chemotherapy doublet. Whether bevacizumab or anti‐epidermal growth factor receptor (anti‐EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) is the more effective addition to a chemotherapy doublet as the first‐line treatment for inoperable KRAS wild‐type mCRC remains controversial in prior clinical trials. Moreover, the association between the sidedness of primary tumors and the efficacy of anti‐EGFR mAb needs to be addressed. METHODS: We established a cohort of patients with KRAS wild‐type mCRC who were treated with first‐line targeted therapy plus doublet chemotherapy between 2013 and 2018 using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Secondary surgery was defined as either resection of primary tumors, liver metastases, lung metastases, or radiofrequency ablation. RESULTS: A total of 6482 patients were included; bevacizumab and anti‐EGFR mAb were the first‐line targeted therapies in 3334 (51.4%) and 3148 (48.6%) patients, respectively. Compared with those who received bevacizumab, patients who received anti‐EGFR mAb exhibited significantly longer overall survival (OS; median, 23.1 vs. 20.2 months, p = 0.012) and time to treatment failure (TTF; median, 11.3 vs. 10 months, p < 0.001). Among left‐sided primary tumors, the OS and TTF benefits of anti‐EGFR mAb remained. Among right‐sided primary tumors, the OS and TTF were similar regardless of the type of targeted therapy. In multivariate analyses, first‐line anti‐EGFR mAb therapy remained an independent predictor of longer OS and TTF for left‐sided primary tumors. Patients who received anti‐EGFR mAb were more likely to receive secondary surgery (29.6% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.0001) than patients who received bevacizumab. CONCLUSION: For patients who received first‐line doublet chemotherapy for KRAS wild‐type mCRC, adding anti‐EGFR mAb was associated with significantly longer OS and TTF, especially for left‐sided primary tumors. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10417087/ /pubmed/37325970 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6196 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Liang, Yi‐Hsin
Chen, Kuo‐Hsing
Shao, Yu‐Yun
Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study
title Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study
title_full Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study
title_fullStr Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study
title_short Treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with KRAS wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: A nationwide database study
title_sort treatment outcome comparisons of first‐line targeted therapy in patients with kras wild‐type metastatic colorectal cancer: a nationwide database study
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37325970
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6196
work_keys_str_mv AT liangyihsin treatmentoutcomecomparisonsoffirstlinetargetedtherapyinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcanceranationwidedatabasestudy
AT chenkuohsing treatmentoutcomecomparisonsoffirstlinetargetedtherapyinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcanceranationwidedatabasestudy
AT shaoyuyun treatmentoutcomecomparisonsoffirstlinetargetedtherapyinpatientswithkraswildtypemetastaticcolorectalcanceranationwidedatabasestudy