Cargando…

Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care

BACKGROUND: A remote monitoring app was developed for head and neck cancer (HNC) follow‐up during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. This mixed‐methods study provides insight in the usability and patients' experiences with the app to develop recommendations for future use. METHODS: Patients were invited...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van de Weerd, Cecile, Ebbers, Tom, Smilde, Donna E. M., van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J., Takes, Robert P., van den Broek, Guido B., Hermens, Rosella P. M. G., Kool, Rudolf B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37293944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6202
_version_ 1785087942780256256
author van de Weerd, Cecile
Ebbers, Tom
Smilde, Donna E. M.
van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J.
Takes, Robert P.
van den Broek, Guido B.
Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
Kool, Rudolf B.
author_facet van de Weerd, Cecile
Ebbers, Tom
Smilde, Donna E. M.
van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J.
Takes, Robert P.
van den Broek, Guido B.
Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
Kool, Rudolf B.
author_sort van de Weerd, Cecile
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A remote monitoring app was developed for head and neck cancer (HNC) follow‐up during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. This mixed‐methods study provides insight in the usability and patients' experiences with the app to develop recommendations for future use. METHODS: Patients were invited to participate if they were treated for HNC, used the app at least once and were in clinical follow‐up. A subset was selected for semi‐structured interviews through purposive sampling considering gender and age. This study was conducted between September 2021–May 2022 at a Dutch university medical center. RESULTS: 135 of the 216 invited patients completed the questionnaire, resulting in a total mHealth usability score of 4.72 (± 1.13) out of 7. Thirteen semi‐structured interviews revealed 12 barriers and 11 facilitators. Most of them occurred at the level of the app itself. For example, patients received no feedback when all their answers were normal. The app made patients feel more responsible over their follow‐up, but could not fulfill the need for personal contact with the attending physician. Patients felt that the app could replace some of the outpatient follow‐up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our app is user‐friendly, makes patients feel more in control and remote monitoring can reduce the frequency of outpatient follow‐up visits. The barriers that emerged must be resolved before the app can be used in regular HNC follow‐up. Future studies should investigate the appropriate ratio of remote monitoring to outpatient follow‐up visits and the cost‐effectiveness of remote monitoring in oncology care on a larger scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104171062023-08-12 Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care van de Weerd, Cecile Ebbers, Tom Smilde, Donna E. M. van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J. Takes, Robert P. van den Broek, Guido B. Hermens, Rosella P. M. G. Kool, Rudolf B. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: A remote monitoring app was developed for head and neck cancer (HNC) follow‐up during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. This mixed‐methods study provides insight in the usability and patients' experiences with the app to develop recommendations for future use. METHODS: Patients were invited to participate if they were treated for HNC, used the app at least once and were in clinical follow‐up. A subset was selected for semi‐structured interviews through purposive sampling considering gender and age. This study was conducted between September 2021–May 2022 at a Dutch university medical center. RESULTS: 135 of the 216 invited patients completed the questionnaire, resulting in a total mHealth usability score of 4.72 (± 1.13) out of 7. Thirteen semi‐structured interviews revealed 12 barriers and 11 facilitators. Most of them occurred at the level of the app itself. For example, patients received no feedback when all their answers were normal. The app made patients feel more responsible over their follow‐up, but could not fulfill the need for personal contact with the attending physician. Patients felt that the app could replace some of the outpatient follow‐up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our app is user‐friendly, makes patients feel more in control and remote monitoring can reduce the frequency of outpatient follow‐up visits. The barriers that emerged must be resolved before the app can be used in regular HNC follow‐up. Future studies should investigate the appropriate ratio of remote monitoring to outpatient follow‐up visits and the cost‐effectiveness of remote monitoring in oncology care on a larger scale. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10417106/ /pubmed/37293944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6202 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
van de Weerd, Cecile
Ebbers, Tom
Smilde, Donna E. M.
van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J.
Takes, Robert P.
van den Broek, Guido B.
Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
Kool, Rudolf B.
Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
title Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
title_full Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
title_fullStr Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
title_short Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
title_sort evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37293944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6202
work_keys_str_mv AT vandeweerdcecile evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare
AT ebberstom evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare
AT smildedonnaem evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare
AT vantolgeerdinkjuliaj evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare
AT takesrobertp evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare
AT vandenbroekguidob evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare
AT hermensrosellapmg evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare
AT koolrudolfb evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare