Cargando…
Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care
BACKGROUND: A remote monitoring app was developed for head and neck cancer (HNC) follow‐up during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. This mixed‐methods study provides insight in the usability and patients' experiences with the app to develop recommendations for future use. METHODS: Patients were invited...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37293944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6202 |
_version_ | 1785087942780256256 |
---|---|
author | van de Weerd, Cecile Ebbers, Tom Smilde, Donna E. M. van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J. Takes, Robert P. van den Broek, Guido B. Hermens, Rosella P. M. G. Kool, Rudolf B. |
author_facet | van de Weerd, Cecile Ebbers, Tom Smilde, Donna E. M. van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J. Takes, Robert P. van den Broek, Guido B. Hermens, Rosella P. M. G. Kool, Rudolf B. |
author_sort | van de Weerd, Cecile |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A remote monitoring app was developed for head and neck cancer (HNC) follow‐up during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. This mixed‐methods study provides insight in the usability and patients' experiences with the app to develop recommendations for future use. METHODS: Patients were invited to participate if they were treated for HNC, used the app at least once and were in clinical follow‐up. A subset was selected for semi‐structured interviews through purposive sampling considering gender and age. This study was conducted between September 2021–May 2022 at a Dutch university medical center. RESULTS: 135 of the 216 invited patients completed the questionnaire, resulting in a total mHealth usability score of 4.72 (± 1.13) out of 7. Thirteen semi‐structured interviews revealed 12 barriers and 11 facilitators. Most of them occurred at the level of the app itself. For example, patients received no feedback when all their answers were normal. The app made patients feel more responsible over their follow‐up, but could not fulfill the need for personal contact with the attending physician. Patients felt that the app could replace some of the outpatient follow‐up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our app is user‐friendly, makes patients feel more in control and remote monitoring can reduce the frequency of outpatient follow‐up visits. The barriers that emerged must be resolved before the app can be used in regular HNC follow‐up. Future studies should investigate the appropriate ratio of remote monitoring to outpatient follow‐up visits and the cost‐effectiveness of remote monitoring in oncology care on a larger scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10417106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104171062023-08-12 Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care van de Weerd, Cecile Ebbers, Tom Smilde, Donna E. M. van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J. Takes, Robert P. van den Broek, Guido B. Hermens, Rosella P. M. G. Kool, Rudolf B. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: A remote monitoring app was developed for head and neck cancer (HNC) follow‐up during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. This mixed‐methods study provides insight in the usability and patients' experiences with the app to develop recommendations for future use. METHODS: Patients were invited to participate if they were treated for HNC, used the app at least once and were in clinical follow‐up. A subset was selected for semi‐structured interviews through purposive sampling considering gender and age. This study was conducted between September 2021–May 2022 at a Dutch university medical center. RESULTS: 135 of the 216 invited patients completed the questionnaire, resulting in a total mHealth usability score of 4.72 (± 1.13) out of 7. Thirteen semi‐structured interviews revealed 12 barriers and 11 facilitators. Most of them occurred at the level of the app itself. For example, patients received no feedback when all their answers were normal. The app made patients feel more responsible over their follow‐up, but could not fulfill the need for personal contact with the attending physician. Patients felt that the app could replace some of the outpatient follow‐up visits. CONCLUSIONS: Our app is user‐friendly, makes patients feel more in control and remote monitoring can reduce the frequency of outpatient follow‐up visits. The barriers that emerged must be resolved before the app can be used in regular HNC follow‐up. Future studies should investigate the appropriate ratio of remote monitoring to outpatient follow‐up visits and the cost‐effectiveness of remote monitoring in oncology care on a larger scale. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10417106/ /pubmed/37293944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6202 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES van de Weerd, Cecile Ebbers, Tom Smilde, Donna E. M. van Tol‐Geerdink, Julia J. Takes, Robert P. van den Broek, Guido B. Hermens, Rosella P. M. G. Kool, Rudolf B. Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care |
title | Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care |
title_full | Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care |
title_short | Evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care |
title_sort | evaluation of a remote monitoring app in head and neck cancer follow‐up care |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37293944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vandeweerdcecile evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare AT ebberstom evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare AT smildedonnaem evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare AT vantolgeerdinkjuliaj evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare AT takesrobertp evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare AT vandenbroekguidob evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare AT hermensrosellapmg evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare AT koolrudolfb evaluationofaremotemonitoringappinheadandneckcancerfollowupcare |