Cargando…
Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry
BACKGROUND: CPX‐351 is approved for the treatment of therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related changes (MRC‐AML). The benefits of this treatment over standard chemotherapy has not been addressed in well matched cohorts of real‐life patients. METHODS: Retrosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6120 |
_version_ | 1785087949333856256 |
---|---|
author | Bernal, Teresa Moreno, Ainhoa Fernández de LaIglesia, Almudena Benavente, Celina García‐Noblejas, Ana Belmonte, Daniel García Riaza, Rosalía Salamero, Olga Foncillas, Maria Angeles Roldán, Alicia Concepción, Víctor Noriega González, Laura Llorente Bergua Burgués, Juan Miguel Lorente de Uña, Soraya Rodríguez‐Macías, Gabriela de la Fuente Burguera, Adolfo García Pérez, Maria José López‐Lorenzo, Jose Luis Martínez, Pilar Aláez, Concepción Callejas, Marta Martínez‐Chamorro, Carmen Roca, José Rifón Barciela, Lourdes Amador Mena Durán, Armando V. Gómez Correcha, Karoll Lavilla Rubira, Esperanza Amigo, María Luz Vall‐llovera, Ferran Garrido, Ana García‐Fortes, María de Miguel Llorente, Dunia Leonardo, Anastasia Aules Cervero, Carlos Jordá, Rosa Coll Pérez‐Encinas, Manuel M. Zarzuela, Marta Polo Figuera, Angela Rad, Guillermo Martínez‐Cuadrón, David Montesinos, Pau |
author_facet | Bernal, Teresa Moreno, Ainhoa Fernández de LaIglesia, Almudena Benavente, Celina García‐Noblejas, Ana Belmonte, Daniel García Riaza, Rosalía Salamero, Olga Foncillas, Maria Angeles Roldán, Alicia Concepción, Víctor Noriega González, Laura Llorente Bergua Burgués, Juan Miguel Lorente de Uña, Soraya Rodríguez‐Macías, Gabriela de la Fuente Burguera, Adolfo García Pérez, Maria José López‐Lorenzo, Jose Luis Martínez, Pilar Aláez, Concepción Callejas, Marta Martínez‐Chamorro, Carmen Roca, José Rifón Barciela, Lourdes Amador Mena Durán, Armando V. Gómez Correcha, Karoll Lavilla Rubira, Esperanza Amigo, María Luz Vall‐llovera, Ferran Garrido, Ana García‐Fortes, María de Miguel Llorente, Dunia Leonardo, Anastasia Aules Cervero, Carlos Jordá, Rosa Coll Pérez‐Encinas, Manuel M. Zarzuela, Marta Polo Figuera, Angela Rad, Guillermo Martínez‐Cuadrón, David Montesinos, Pau |
author_sort | Bernal, Teresa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: CPX‐351 is approved for the treatment of therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related changes (MRC‐AML). The benefits of this treatment over standard chemotherapy has not been addressed in well matched cohorts of real‐life patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of AML patients treated with CPX‐351 as per routine practice. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare their main outcomes with those observed in a matched cohort among 765 historical patients receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), all of them reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry. RESULTS: Median age of 79 patients treated with CPX‐351 was 67 years old (interquartile range 62–71), 53 were MRC‐AML. The complete remission (CR) rate or CR without recovery (CRi) after 1 or 2 cycles of CPX‐351 was 52%, 60‐days mortality 18%, measurable residual disease <0.1% in 54% (12 out of 22) of them. Stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed in 27 patients (34%), median OS was 10.3 months, and 3‐year relapse incidence was 50%. Using PSM, we obtained two comparable cohorts treated with CPX‐351 (n = 52) or IC (n = 99), without significant differences in CR/CRi (60% vs. 54%) and median OS (10.3 months vs. 9.1 months), although more patients were bridged to SCT in the CPX‐351 group (35% vs. 12%). The results were confirmed when only 3 + 7 patients were included in the historical cohort. In multivariable analyses, SCT was associated with better OS (HR 0.33 95% CI: 0.18–0.59), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Larger post‐authorization studies may provide evidence of the clinical benefits of CPX‐351 for AML in the real‐life setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10417130 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104171302023-08-12 Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry Bernal, Teresa Moreno, Ainhoa Fernández de LaIglesia, Almudena Benavente, Celina García‐Noblejas, Ana Belmonte, Daniel García Riaza, Rosalía Salamero, Olga Foncillas, Maria Angeles Roldán, Alicia Concepción, Víctor Noriega González, Laura Llorente Bergua Burgués, Juan Miguel Lorente de Uña, Soraya Rodríguez‐Macías, Gabriela de la Fuente Burguera, Adolfo García Pérez, Maria José López‐Lorenzo, Jose Luis Martínez, Pilar Aláez, Concepción Callejas, Marta Martínez‐Chamorro, Carmen Roca, José Rifón Barciela, Lourdes Amador Mena Durán, Armando V. Gómez Correcha, Karoll Lavilla Rubira, Esperanza Amigo, María Luz Vall‐llovera, Ferran Garrido, Ana García‐Fortes, María de Miguel Llorente, Dunia Leonardo, Anastasia Aules Cervero, Carlos Jordá, Rosa Coll Pérez‐Encinas, Manuel M. Zarzuela, Marta Polo Figuera, Angela Rad, Guillermo Martínez‐Cuadrón, David Montesinos, Pau Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: CPX‐351 is approved for the treatment of therapy related acute myeloid leukemia (t‐AML) and AML with myelodysplastic related changes (MRC‐AML). The benefits of this treatment over standard chemotherapy has not been addressed in well matched cohorts of real‐life patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of AML patients treated with CPX‐351 as per routine practice. A propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare their main outcomes with those observed in a matched cohort among 765 historical patients receiving intensive chemotherapy (IC), all of them reported to the PETHEMA epidemiologic registry. RESULTS: Median age of 79 patients treated with CPX‐351 was 67 years old (interquartile range 62–71), 53 were MRC‐AML. The complete remission (CR) rate or CR without recovery (CRi) after 1 or 2 cycles of CPX‐351 was 52%, 60‐days mortality 18%, measurable residual disease <0.1% in 54% (12 out of 22) of them. Stem cell transplant (SCT) was performed in 27 patients (34%), median OS was 10.3 months, and 3‐year relapse incidence was 50%. Using PSM, we obtained two comparable cohorts treated with CPX‐351 (n = 52) or IC (n = 99), without significant differences in CR/CRi (60% vs. 54%) and median OS (10.3 months vs. 9.1 months), although more patients were bridged to SCT in the CPX‐351 group (35% vs. 12%). The results were confirmed when only 3 + 7 patients were included in the historical cohort. In multivariable analyses, SCT was associated with better OS (HR 0.33 95% CI: 0.18–0.59), p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Larger post‐authorization studies may provide evidence of the clinical benefits of CPX‐351 for AML in the real‐life setting. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10417130/ /pubmed/37212507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6120 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Bernal, Teresa Moreno, Ainhoa Fernández de LaIglesia, Almudena Benavente, Celina García‐Noblejas, Ana Belmonte, Daniel García Riaza, Rosalía Salamero, Olga Foncillas, Maria Angeles Roldán, Alicia Concepción, Víctor Noriega González, Laura Llorente Bergua Burgués, Juan Miguel Lorente de Uña, Soraya Rodríguez‐Macías, Gabriela de la Fuente Burguera, Adolfo García Pérez, Maria José López‐Lorenzo, Jose Luis Martínez, Pilar Aláez, Concepción Callejas, Marta Martínez‐Chamorro, Carmen Roca, José Rifón Barciela, Lourdes Amador Mena Durán, Armando V. Gómez Correcha, Karoll Lavilla Rubira, Esperanza Amigo, María Luz Vall‐llovera, Ferran Garrido, Ana García‐Fortes, María de Miguel Llorente, Dunia Leonardo, Anastasia Aules Cervero, Carlos Jordá, Rosa Coll Pérez‐Encinas, Manuel M. Zarzuela, Marta Polo Figuera, Angela Rad, Guillermo Martínez‐Cuadrón, David Montesinos, Pau Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry |
title | Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry |
title_full | Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry |
title_fullStr | Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry |
title_short | Clinical outcomes after CPX‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: A comparison with a matched cohort from the Spanish PETHEMA registry |
title_sort | clinical outcomes after cpx‐351 in patients with high‐risk acute myeloid leukemia: a comparison with a matched cohort from the spanish pethema registry |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417130/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6120 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernalteresa clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT morenoainhoafernandez clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT delaiglesiaalmudena clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT benaventecelina clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT garcianoblejasana clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT belmontedanielgarcia clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT riazarosalia clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT salameroolga clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT foncillasmariaangeles clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT roldanalicia clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT concepcionvictornoriega clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT gonzalezlaurallorente clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT berguaburguesjuanmiguel clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT lorentedeunasoraya clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT rodriguezmaciasgabriela clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT delafuenteburgueraadolfo clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT garciaperezmariajose clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT lopezlorenzojoseluis clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT martinezpilar clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT alaezconcepcion clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT callejasmarta clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT martinezchamorrocarmen clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT rocajoserifon clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT barcielalourdesamador clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT menaduranarmandov clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT gomezcorrechakaroll clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT lavillarubiraesperanza clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT amigomarialuz clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT valllloveraferran clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT garridoana clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT garciafortesmaria clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT demiguelllorentedunia clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT leonardoanastasiaaules clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT cerverocarlos clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT jordarosacoll clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT perezencinasmanuelm clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT zarzuelamartapolo clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT figueraangela clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT radguillermo clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT martinezcuadrondavid clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry AT montesinospau clinicaloutcomesaftercpx351inpatientswithhighriskacutemyeloidleukemiaacomparisonwithamatchedcohortfromthespanishpethemaregistry |