Cargando…
Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors
OBJECTIVE: The treatment of biliary tract (BTC) cancer remains relatively limited, especially in the setting of advanced BTC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown some effects in a variety of solid tumors, but their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced BTC are still elusive, which...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37392168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6209 |
_version_ | 1785087956384481280 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Zhengfeng Wang, Dazhen Yang, Liu Zhao, Lu Yang, Lei Zhang, Jianji Lou, Changjie |
author_facet | Zhang, Zhengfeng Wang, Dazhen Yang, Liu Zhao, Lu Yang, Lei Zhang, Jianji Lou, Changjie |
author_sort | Zhang, Zhengfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The treatment of biliary tract (BTC) cancer remains relatively limited, especially in the setting of advanced BTC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown some effects in a variety of solid tumors, but their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced BTC are still elusive, which require in‐depth analysis. METHODS: The clinical information of 129 patients diagnosed with advanced BTC between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with chemotherapy, while a portion of them (64 patients) were treated with ICIs, the other 64 patients were not. Therefore, we divided the patients into two groups, SC (standard chemotherapy) and CI (chemotherapy in combined with immunotherapy), then we analyzed the benefit of adding ICIs according to efficacy, adverse events, progression‐free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and the influence of various factors and effectiveness. RESULTS: The mean PFS was 9.67 months for CI group and 6.83 months for SC group. The PFS was prolonged by 2.84 months with ICI addition, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 3.114, 95% CI: 1.06–4.74, p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was 32.81% (21/64) for the CI group versus 10.77% (7/65) for the SC group, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 79.69% (51/64) versus 67.69% (44/65), respectively. Regression analysis showed that factors such as changes in CA19‐9, the level of PD‐L1 expression, tobacco and alcohol, and the neutrophil–lymphocyte (NLR) ratio all influenced PFS (p < 0.05 for all these factors). For the treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs), the highest grade 3–4 adverse effects were thrombocytopenia in 7.75% (10/129) and neutropenia in 3.1% (4/129), immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 32.8% (21/64), and all were grade 1–2. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that ICIs combined with chemotherapy exhibited good antitumor activity with acceptable safety and could be recommended as first‐line treatment for patients with advanced BTC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10417155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104171552023-08-12 Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors Zhang, Zhengfeng Wang, Dazhen Yang, Liu Zhao, Lu Yang, Lei Zhang, Jianji Lou, Changjie Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES OBJECTIVE: The treatment of biliary tract (BTC) cancer remains relatively limited, especially in the setting of advanced BTC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown some effects in a variety of solid tumors, but their efficacy and safety in patients with advanced BTC are still elusive, which require in‐depth analysis. METHODS: The clinical information of 129 patients diagnosed with advanced BTC between 2018 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with chemotherapy, while a portion of them (64 patients) were treated with ICIs, the other 64 patients were not. Therefore, we divided the patients into two groups, SC (standard chemotherapy) and CI (chemotherapy in combined with immunotherapy), then we analyzed the benefit of adding ICIs according to efficacy, adverse events, progression‐free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD), and the influence of various factors and effectiveness. RESULTS: The mean PFS was 9.67 months for CI group and 6.83 months for SC group. The PFS was prolonged by 2.84 months with ICI addition, and the difference was statistically significant (t = 3.114, 95% CI: 1.06–4.74, p < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was 32.81% (21/64) for the CI group versus 10.77% (7/65) for the SC group, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 79.69% (51/64) versus 67.69% (44/65), respectively. Regression analysis showed that factors such as changes in CA19‐9, the level of PD‐L1 expression, tobacco and alcohol, and the neutrophil–lymphocyte (NLR) ratio all influenced PFS (p < 0.05 for all these factors). For the treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs), the highest grade 3–4 adverse effects were thrombocytopenia in 7.75% (10/129) and neutropenia in 3.1% (4/129), immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 32.8% (21/64), and all were grade 1–2. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that ICIs combined with chemotherapy exhibited good antitumor activity with acceptable safety and could be recommended as first‐line treatment for patients with advanced BTC. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10417155/ /pubmed/37392168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6209 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Zhang, Zhengfeng Wang, Dazhen Yang, Liu Zhao, Lu Yang, Lei Zhang, Jianji Lou, Changjie Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors |
title | Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors |
title_full | Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors |
title_short | Efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors |
title_sort | efficacy and safety analysis of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract malignant tumors |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37392168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangzhengfeng efficacyandsafetyanalysisofchemotherapycombinedwithimmunotherapycomparedwithstandardchemotherapyforadvancedbiliarytractmalignanttumors AT wangdazhen efficacyandsafetyanalysisofchemotherapycombinedwithimmunotherapycomparedwithstandardchemotherapyforadvancedbiliarytractmalignanttumors AT yangliu efficacyandsafetyanalysisofchemotherapycombinedwithimmunotherapycomparedwithstandardchemotherapyforadvancedbiliarytractmalignanttumors AT zhaolu efficacyandsafetyanalysisofchemotherapycombinedwithimmunotherapycomparedwithstandardchemotherapyforadvancedbiliarytractmalignanttumors AT yanglei efficacyandsafetyanalysisofchemotherapycombinedwithimmunotherapycomparedwithstandardchemotherapyforadvancedbiliarytractmalignanttumors AT zhangjianji efficacyandsafetyanalysisofchemotherapycombinedwithimmunotherapycomparedwithstandardchemotherapyforadvancedbiliarytractmalignanttumors AT louchangjie efficacyandsafetyanalysisofchemotherapycombinedwithimmunotherapycomparedwithstandardchemotherapyforadvancedbiliarytractmalignanttumors |