Cargando…

Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Repeat radiotherapy to a part of the body that has previously been treated with radiotherapy is challenging. It is difficult to determine where the dose previously went and how to safely deliver the best possible radiotherapy re-treatment. A tool designed to create better re-treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Christopher, Pagett, Christopher, Lilley, John, Svensson, Stina, Eriksson, Kjell, Bokrantz, Rasmus, Ödén, Jakob, Nix, Michael, Murray, Louise, Appelt, Ane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153831
_version_ 1785087989137801216
author Thompson, Christopher
Pagett, Christopher
Lilley, John
Svensson, Stina
Eriksson, Kjell
Bokrantz, Rasmus
Ödén, Jakob
Nix, Michael
Murray, Louise
Appelt, Ane
author_facet Thompson, Christopher
Pagett, Christopher
Lilley, John
Svensson, Stina
Eriksson, Kjell
Bokrantz, Rasmus
Ödén, Jakob
Nix, Michael
Murray, Louise
Appelt, Ane
author_sort Thompson, Christopher
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Repeat radiotherapy to a part of the body that has previously been treated with radiotherapy is challenging. It is difficult to determine where the dose previously went and how to safely deliver the best possible radiotherapy re-treatment. A tool designed to create better re-treatment plans is developed. In this work, we evaluate the safety of the new tools, which is an essential step before using it to make changes to patient treatments. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: The STRIDeR (Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology) planning pathway aims to facilitate anatomically appropriate and radiobiologically meaningful re-irradiation (reRT). This work evaluated the STRIDeR pathway for robustness compared to a more conservative manual pathway. (2) Methods: For ten high-grade glioma reRT patient cases, uncertainties were applied and cumulative doses re-summed. Geometric uncertainties of 3, 6 and 9 mm were applied to the background dose, and LQ model robustness was tested using α/β variations (values 1, 2 and 5 Gy) and the linear quadratic linear (LQL) model δ variations (values 0.1 and 0.2). STRIDeR robust optimised plans, incorporating the geometric and α/β uncertainties during optimisation, were also generated. (3) Results: The STRIDeR and manual pathways both achieved clinically acceptable plans in 8/10 cases but with statistically significant improvements in the PTV D98% (p < 0.01) for STRIDeR. Geometric and LQ robustness tests showed comparable robustness within both pathways. STRIDeR plans generated to incorporate uncertainties during optimisation resulted in a superior plan robustness with a minimal impact on PTV dose benefits. (4) Conclusions: Our results indicate that STRIDeR pathway plans achieved a similar robustness to manual pathways with improved PTV doses. Geometric and LQ model uncertainties can be incorporated into the STRIDeR pathway to facilitate robust optimisation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417278
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104172782023-08-12 Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose Thompson, Christopher Pagett, Christopher Lilley, John Svensson, Stina Eriksson, Kjell Bokrantz, Rasmus Ödén, Jakob Nix, Michael Murray, Louise Appelt, Ane Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Repeat radiotherapy to a part of the body that has previously been treated with radiotherapy is challenging. It is difficult to determine where the dose previously went and how to safely deliver the best possible radiotherapy re-treatment. A tool designed to create better re-treatment plans is developed. In this work, we evaluate the safety of the new tools, which is an essential step before using it to make changes to patient treatments. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: The STRIDeR (Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology) planning pathway aims to facilitate anatomically appropriate and radiobiologically meaningful re-irradiation (reRT). This work evaluated the STRIDeR pathway for robustness compared to a more conservative manual pathway. (2) Methods: For ten high-grade glioma reRT patient cases, uncertainties were applied and cumulative doses re-summed. Geometric uncertainties of 3, 6 and 9 mm were applied to the background dose, and LQ model robustness was tested using α/β variations (values 1, 2 and 5 Gy) and the linear quadratic linear (LQL) model δ variations (values 0.1 and 0.2). STRIDeR robust optimised plans, incorporating the geometric and α/β uncertainties during optimisation, were also generated. (3) Results: The STRIDeR and manual pathways both achieved clinically acceptable plans in 8/10 cases but with statistically significant improvements in the PTV D98% (p < 0.01) for STRIDeR. Geometric and LQ robustness tests showed comparable robustness within both pathways. STRIDeR plans generated to incorporate uncertainties during optimisation resulted in a superior plan robustness with a minimal impact on PTV dose benefits. (4) Conclusions: Our results indicate that STRIDeR pathway plans achieved a similar robustness to manual pathways with improved PTV doses. Geometric and LQ model uncertainties can be incorporated into the STRIDeR pathway to facilitate robust optimisation. MDPI 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10417278/ /pubmed/37568647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153831 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Thompson, Christopher
Pagett, Christopher
Lilley, John
Svensson, Stina
Eriksson, Kjell
Bokrantz, Rasmus
Ödén, Jakob
Nix, Michael
Murray, Louise
Appelt, Ane
Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose
title Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose
title_full Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose
title_fullStr Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose
title_full_unstemmed Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose
title_short Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose
title_sort brain re-irradiation robustly accounting for previously delivered dose
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417278/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568647
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153831
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonchristopher brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT pagettchristopher brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT lilleyjohn brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT svenssonstina brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT erikssonkjell brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT bokrantzrasmus brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT odenjakob brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT nixmichael brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT murraylouise brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose
AT appeltane brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose