Cargando…
Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Repeat radiotherapy to a part of the body that has previously been treated with radiotherapy is challenging. It is difficult to determine where the dose previously went and how to safely deliver the best possible radiotherapy re-treatment. A tool designed to create better re-treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153831 |
_version_ | 1785087989137801216 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Christopher Pagett, Christopher Lilley, John Svensson, Stina Eriksson, Kjell Bokrantz, Rasmus Ödén, Jakob Nix, Michael Murray, Louise Appelt, Ane |
author_facet | Thompson, Christopher Pagett, Christopher Lilley, John Svensson, Stina Eriksson, Kjell Bokrantz, Rasmus Ödén, Jakob Nix, Michael Murray, Louise Appelt, Ane |
author_sort | Thompson, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Repeat radiotherapy to a part of the body that has previously been treated with radiotherapy is challenging. It is difficult to determine where the dose previously went and how to safely deliver the best possible radiotherapy re-treatment. A tool designed to create better re-treatment plans is developed. In this work, we evaluate the safety of the new tools, which is an essential step before using it to make changes to patient treatments. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: The STRIDeR (Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology) planning pathway aims to facilitate anatomically appropriate and radiobiologically meaningful re-irradiation (reRT). This work evaluated the STRIDeR pathway for robustness compared to a more conservative manual pathway. (2) Methods: For ten high-grade glioma reRT patient cases, uncertainties were applied and cumulative doses re-summed. Geometric uncertainties of 3, 6 and 9 mm were applied to the background dose, and LQ model robustness was tested using α/β variations (values 1, 2 and 5 Gy) and the linear quadratic linear (LQL) model δ variations (values 0.1 and 0.2). STRIDeR robust optimised plans, incorporating the geometric and α/β uncertainties during optimisation, were also generated. (3) Results: The STRIDeR and manual pathways both achieved clinically acceptable plans in 8/10 cases but with statistically significant improvements in the PTV D98% (p < 0.01) for STRIDeR. Geometric and LQ robustness tests showed comparable robustness within both pathways. STRIDeR plans generated to incorporate uncertainties during optimisation resulted in a superior plan robustness with a minimal impact on PTV dose benefits. (4) Conclusions: Our results indicate that STRIDeR pathway plans achieved a similar robustness to manual pathways with improved PTV doses. Geometric and LQ model uncertainties can be incorporated into the STRIDeR pathway to facilitate robust optimisation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10417278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104172782023-08-12 Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose Thompson, Christopher Pagett, Christopher Lilley, John Svensson, Stina Eriksson, Kjell Bokrantz, Rasmus Ödén, Jakob Nix, Michael Murray, Louise Appelt, Ane Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Repeat radiotherapy to a part of the body that has previously been treated with radiotherapy is challenging. It is difficult to determine where the dose previously went and how to safely deliver the best possible radiotherapy re-treatment. A tool designed to create better re-treatment plans is developed. In this work, we evaluate the safety of the new tools, which is an essential step before using it to make changes to patient treatments. ABSTRACT: (1) Background: The STRIDeR (Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology) planning pathway aims to facilitate anatomically appropriate and radiobiologically meaningful re-irradiation (reRT). This work evaluated the STRIDeR pathway for robustness compared to a more conservative manual pathway. (2) Methods: For ten high-grade glioma reRT patient cases, uncertainties were applied and cumulative doses re-summed. Geometric uncertainties of 3, 6 and 9 mm were applied to the background dose, and LQ model robustness was tested using α/β variations (values 1, 2 and 5 Gy) and the linear quadratic linear (LQL) model δ variations (values 0.1 and 0.2). STRIDeR robust optimised plans, incorporating the geometric and α/β uncertainties during optimisation, were also generated. (3) Results: The STRIDeR and manual pathways both achieved clinically acceptable plans in 8/10 cases but with statistically significant improvements in the PTV D98% (p < 0.01) for STRIDeR. Geometric and LQ robustness tests showed comparable robustness within both pathways. STRIDeR plans generated to incorporate uncertainties during optimisation resulted in a superior plan robustness with a minimal impact on PTV dose benefits. (4) Conclusions: Our results indicate that STRIDeR pathway plans achieved a similar robustness to manual pathways with improved PTV doses. Geometric and LQ model uncertainties can be incorporated into the STRIDeR pathway to facilitate robust optimisation. MDPI 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10417278/ /pubmed/37568647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153831 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Thompson, Christopher Pagett, Christopher Lilley, John Svensson, Stina Eriksson, Kjell Bokrantz, Rasmus Ödén, Jakob Nix, Michael Murray, Louise Appelt, Ane Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose |
title | Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose |
title_full | Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose |
title_fullStr | Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose |
title_full_unstemmed | Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose |
title_short | Brain Re-Irradiation Robustly Accounting for Previously Delivered Dose |
title_sort | brain re-irradiation robustly accounting for previously delivered dose |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568647 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonchristopher brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT pagettchristopher brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT lilleyjohn brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT svenssonstina brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT erikssonkjell brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT bokrantzrasmus brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT odenjakob brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT nixmichael brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT murraylouise brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose AT appeltane brainreirradiationrobustlyaccountingforpreviouslydelivereddose |