Cargando…

Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered”

ABSTRACT: Prof. dr. sc. Slađana Štrkalj Ivezić, psychiatrist, University psychiatric hospital Vrapče, Croatia The aim is to present the importance of educating psychiatrists to acquire competencies relate to knowledge, attitudes and behavior in holistic understanding of patients, implementation of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ivezic, S. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417409/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.156
_version_ 1785088027988590592
author Ivezic, S. S.
author_facet Ivezic, S. S.
author_sort Ivezic, S. S.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Prof. dr. sc. Slađana Štrkalj Ivezić, psychiatrist, University psychiatric hospital Vrapče, Croatia The aim is to present the importance of educating psychiatrists to acquire competencies relate to knowledge, attitudes and behavior in holistic understanding of patients, implementation of principles of recovery and respect for human rights and use of alternative interventions to coercion in order to eliminate or reduce coercive practice such as involuntary hospitalizations and coercive measures. All the necessary competences such as clinical assessment, skills to form therapeutical relationship and application of evidence base interventions that can prevent or significantly reduce the use of coercive measures: de-escalation; availability of a comfort room with sensory modulation; a trained response team; joint crisis intervention, advance directives and successful multimodal strategies will be presented including the elimination of potential environmental triggers of aggression in the hospital setting. The training and education of psychiatrists on human rights, recovery and alternatives to coercive practice can abolish or significantly reduce coercion. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104174092023-08-12 Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered” Ivezic, S. S. Eur Psychiatry Abstract ABSTRACT: Prof. dr. sc. Slađana Štrkalj Ivezić, psychiatrist, University psychiatric hospital Vrapče, Croatia The aim is to present the importance of educating psychiatrists to acquire competencies relate to knowledge, attitudes and behavior in holistic understanding of patients, implementation of principles of recovery and respect for human rights and use of alternative interventions to coercion in order to eliminate or reduce coercive practice such as involuntary hospitalizations and coercive measures. All the necessary competences such as clinical assessment, skills to form therapeutical relationship and application of evidence base interventions that can prevent or significantly reduce the use of coercive measures: de-escalation; availability of a comfort room with sensory modulation; a trained response team; joint crisis intervention, advance directives and successful multimodal strategies will be presented including the elimination of potential environmental triggers of aggression in the hospital setting. The training and education of psychiatrists on human rights, recovery and alternatives to coercive practice can abolish or significantly reduce coercion. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared Cambridge University Press 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10417409/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.156 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Ivezic, S. S.
Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered”
title Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered”
title_full Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered”
title_fullStr Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered”
title_full_unstemmed Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered”
title_short Comments on the position UEMS paper “Maintaining Human Rights and recovery principles when Coercive Practices are considered”
title_sort comments on the position uems paper “maintaining human rights and recovery principles when coercive practices are considered”
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417409/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.156
work_keys_str_mv AT ivezicss commentsonthepositionuemspapermaintaininghumanrightsandrecoveryprincipleswhencoercivepracticesareconsidered