Cargando…

Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The updated results of the RMS2005 randomized study confirm that patients with non-metastatic high risk rhabdomyosarcoma have an improved survival when maintenance chemotherapy (MC) with vinorelbine and low dose cyclophosphamide is added to the standard multidisciplinary treatment. A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bisogno, Gianni, Minard-Colin, Veronique, Jenney, Meriel., Ferrari, Andrea, Chisholm, Julia, Di Carlo, Daniela, Hjalgrim, Lisa Lyngsie, Orbach, Daniel, Merks, Johannes Hendrikus Maria, Casanova, Michela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15154012
_version_ 1785088069495422976
author Bisogno, Gianni
Minard-Colin, Veronique
Jenney, Meriel.
Ferrari, Andrea
Chisholm, Julia
Di Carlo, Daniela
Hjalgrim, Lisa Lyngsie
Orbach, Daniel
Merks, Johannes Hendrikus Maria
Casanova, Michela
author_facet Bisogno, Gianni
Minard-Colin, Veronique
Jenney, Meriel.
Ferrari, Andrea
Chisholm, Julia
Di Carlo, Daniela
Hjalgrim, Lisa Lyngsie
Orbach, Daniel
Merks, Johannes Hendrikus Maria
Casanova, Michela
author_sort Bisogno, Gianni
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The updated results of the RMS2005 randomized study confirm that patients with non-metastatic high risk rhabdomyosarcoma have an improved survival when maintenance chemotherapy (MC) with vinorelbine and low dose cyclophosphamide is added to the standard multidisciplinary treatment. A more recent randomized study adopted the same strategy, but different drugs were used in the MC phase (trofosfamide, idarubicin and etoposide). No survival improvement was evident in the MC group, suggesting that not all types of MC are equally effective. A revision of the literature demonstrates that the role of MC in patients with metastatic or relapsed RMS may be a promising approach but need more investigations. ABSTRACT: Maintenance chemotherapy (MC) defines the administration of prolonged relatively low-intensity chemotherapy with the aim of “maintaining” tumor complete remission. This paper aims to report an update of the RMS2005 trial, which demonstrated better survival for patients with high-risk localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) when MC with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide was added to standard chemotherapy, and to discuss the published experience on MC in RMS. In the RMS2005 study, the outcome for patients receiving MC vs. those who stopped the treatment remains superior, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 78.1% vs. 70.1% (p = 0.056) and overall survival of 85.0% vs. 72.4% (p = 0.008), respectively. We found seven papers describing MC in RMS, but only one randomized trial that did not demonstrate any advantage when MC with eight courses of trofosfamide/idarubicine alternating with trofosfamide/etoposide has been employed in high-risk RMS. The use of MC showed better results in comparison to high-dose chemotherapy in non-randomized studies, including metastatic patients, and demonstrated feasibility and tolerability in relapsed RMS. Many aspects of MC in RMS need to be investigated, including the best drug combination and the optimal duration. The ongoing EpSSG trial will try to answer some of these questions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104175712023-08-12 Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma Bisogno, Gianni Minard-Colin, Veronique Jenney, Meriel. Ferrari, Andrea Chisholm, Julia Di Carlo, Daniela Hjalgrim, Lisa Lyngsie Orbach, Daniel Merks, Johannes Hendrikus Maria Casanova, Michela Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The updated results of the RMS2005 randomized study confirm that patients with non-metastatic high risk rhabdomyosarcoma have an improved survival when maintenance chemotherapy (MC) with vinorelbine and low dose cyclophosphamide is added to the standard multidisciplinary treatment. A more recent randomized study adopted the same strategy, but different drugs were used in the MC phase (trofosfamide, idarubicin and etoposide). No survival improvement was evident in the MC group, suggesting that not all types of MC are equally effective. A revision of the literature demonstrates that the role of MC in patients with metastatic or relapsed RMS may be a promising approach but need more investigations. ABSTRACT: Maintenance chemotherapy (MC) defines the administration of prolonged relatively low-intensity chemotherapy with the aim of “maintaining” tumor complete remission. This paper aims to report an update of the RMS2005 trial, which demonstrated better survival for patients with high-risk localized rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) when MC with vinorelbine and low-dose cyclophosphamide was added to standard chemotherapy, and to discuss the published experience on MC in RMS. In the RMS2005 study, the outcome for patients receiving MC vs. those who stopped the treatment remains superior, with a 5-year disease-free survival of 78.1% vs. 70.1% (p = 0.056) and overall survival of 85.0% vs. 72.4% (p = 0.008), respectively. We found seven papers describing MC in RMS, but only one randomized trial that did not demonstrate any advantage when MC with eight courses of trofosfamide/idarubicine alternating with trofosfamide/etoposide has been employed in high-risk RMS. The use of MC showed better results in comparison to high-dose chemotherapy in non-randomized studies, including metastatic patients, and demonstrated feasibility and tolerability in relapsed RMS. Many aspects of MC in RMS need to be investigated, including the best drug combination and the optimal duration. The ongoing EpSSG trial will try to answer some of these questions. MDPI 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10417571/ /pubmed/37568826 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15154012 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Bisogno, Gianni
Minard-Colin, Veronique
Jenney, Meriel.
Ferrari, Andrea
Chisholm, Julia
Di Carlo, Daniela
Hjalgrim, Lisa Lyngsie
Orbach, Daniel
Merks, Johannes Hendrikus Maria
Casanova, Michela
Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma
title Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_full Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_fullStr Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_full_unstemmed Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_short Maintenance Chemotherapy for Patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma
title_sort maintenance chemotherapy for patients with rhabdomyosarcoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568826
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15154012
work_keys_str_mv AT bisognogianni maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT minardcolinveronique maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT jenneymeriel maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT ferrariandrea maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT chisholmjulia maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT dicarlodaniela maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT hjalgrimlisalyngsie maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT orbachdaniel maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT merksjohanneshendrikusmaria maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma
AT casanovamichela maintenancechemotherapyforpatientswithrhabdomyosarcoma