Cargando…

Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual

ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: In 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tomcuk, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417763/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.106
_version_ 1785088116456947712
author Tomcuk, A.
author_facet Tomcuk, A.
author_sort Tomcuk, A.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: In 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model). Objectives: The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of seclusions, restraints and forced medication during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro. METHODS: A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued (outpatient treatment without field work and hospital readmissions during the psychotic relapses). To estimate and follow-up the frequency of application of coercive measures in this research, hospital documentation was used. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining, seclusions, isolations and forced medication) during the study. There were no significant differences in the number of hospital days and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104177632023-08-12 Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual Tomcuk, A. Eur Psychiatry Abstract ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: In 2018, within the Horizon 2020 program, RECOVER-E project activities were initiated in Montenegro. During the years 2019 and 2020 Community mental health team (CMHT) within the Special Psychiatric Hospital Kotor was established. This team became responsible for management of treatment of a group of users with severe mental health illnesses, based on the principles of „Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT – A Dutch model). Objectives: The main objective of this research was to establish whether there were substantial differences regarding the use of seclusions, restraints and forced medication during the hospital readmissions in the group of patients treated by the CMHT, compared to usual mental health care in Montenegro. METHODS: A sample of 202 users of mental health services from Kotor and surrounding municipalities were recruited. Patients were randomized into two similar-sized groups - intervention group, whose treatment was managed by the multidisciplinary CMHT, and control group where treatment as usual was continued (outpatient treatment without field work and hospital readmissions during the psychotic relapses). To estimate and follow-up the frequency of application of coercive measures in this research, hospital documentation was used. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group had statistically significant less coercive intervention (such are mechanical restraining, seclusions, isolations and forced medication) during the study. There were no significant differences in the number of hospital days and readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that CMHT care could reduce some of the coercive measures during the treatment of severe mental illnesses. DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST: None Declared Cambridge University Press 2023-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10417763/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.106 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Tomcuk, A.
Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_full Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_fullStr Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_full_unstemmed Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_short Coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
title_sort coercion rates in different mental health care models: flexible assertive community treatment vs care as usual
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417763/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.106
work_keys_str_mv AT tomcuka coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual
AT coercionratesindifferentmentalhealthcaremodelsflexibleassertivecommunitytreatmentvscareasusual