Cargando…

Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas

Histological identification of dispersed glioma cells in small biopsies can be challenging, especially in tumours lacking the IDH1 R132H mutation or alterations in TP53. We postulated that immunohistochemical detection of proteins expressed preferentially in gliomas (EGFR, MEOX2, CD34) or during emb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soukup, Jiri, Gerykova, Lucie, Rachelkar, Anjali, Hornychova, Helena, Bartos, Michael Christian, Krupa, Petr, Vitovcova, Barbora, Pleskacova, Zuzana, Kasparova, Petra, Dvorakova, Katerina, Skarkova, Veronika, Petera, Jiri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152546
_version_ 1785088130971336704
author Soukup, Jiri
Gerykova, Lucie
Rachelkar, Anjali
Hornychova, Helena
Bartos, Michael Christian
Krupa, Petr
Vitovcova, Barbora
Pleskacova, Zuzana
Kasparova, Petra
Dvorakova, Katerina
Skarkova, Veronika
Petera, Jiri
author_facet Soukup, Jiri
Gerykova, Lucie
Rachelkar, Anjali
Hornychova, Helena
Bartos, Michael Christian
Krupa, Petr
Vitovcova, Barbora
Pleskacova, Zuzana
Kasparova, Petra
Dvorakova, Katerina
Skarkova, Veronika
Petera, Jiri
author_sort Soukup, Jiri
collection PubMed
description Histological identification of dispersed glioma cells in small biopsies can be challenging, especially in tumours lacking the IDH1 R132H mutation or alterations in TP53. We postulated that immunohistochemical detection of proteins expressed preferentially in gliomas (EGFR, MEOX2, CD34) or during embryonal development (SOX11, INSM1) can be used to distinguish reactive gliosis from glioma. Tissue microarrays of 46 reactive glioses, 81 glioblastomas, 34 IDH1-mutant diffuse gliomas, and 23 gliomas of other types were analysed. Glial neoplasms were significantly more often (p < 0.001, χ(2)) positive for EGFR (34.1% vs. 0%), MEOX2 (49.3% vs. 2.3%), SOX11 (70.5% vs. 20.4%), and INSM1 (65.4% vs. 2.3%). In 94.3% (66/70) of the glioblastomas, the expression of at least two markers was observed, while no reactive gliosis showed coexpression of any of the proteins. Compared to IDH1-mutant tumours, glioblastomas showed significantly higher expression of EGFR, MEOX2, and CD34 and significantly lower positivity for SOX11. Non-diffuse gliomas were only rarely positive for any of the five markers tested. Our results indicate that immunohistochemical detection of EGFR, MEOX2, SOX11, and INSM1 can be useful for detection of glioblastoma cells in limited histological samples, especially when used in combination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10417822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104178222023-08-12 Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas Soukup, Jiri Gerykova, Lucie Rachelkar, Anjali Hornychova, Helena Bartos, Michael Christian Krupa, Petr Vitovcova, Barbora Pleskacova, Zuzana Kasparova, Petra Dvorakova, Katerina Skarkova, Veronika Petera, Jiri Diagnostics (Basel) Article Histological identification of dispersed glioma cells in small biopsies can be challenging, especially in tumours lacking the IDH1 R132H mutation or alterations in TP53. We postulated that immunohistochemical detection of proteins expressed preferentially in gliomas (EGFR, MEOX2, CD34) or during embryonal development (SOX11, INSM1) can be used to distinguish reactive gliosis from glioma. Tissue microarrays of 46 reactive glioses, 81 glioblastomas, 34 IDH1-mutant diffuse gliomas, and 23 gliomas of other types were analysed. Glial neoplasms were significantly more often (p < 0.001, χ(2)) positive for EGFR (34.1% vs. 0%), MEOX2 (49.3% vs. 2.3%), SOX11 (70.5% vs. 20.4%), and INSM1 (65.4% vs. 2.3%). In 94.3% (66/70) of the glioblastomas, the expression of at least two markers was observed, while no reactive gliosis showed coexpression of any of the proteins. Compared to IDH1-mutant tumours, glioblastomas showed significantly higher expression of EGFR, MEOX2, and CD34 and significantly lower positivity for SOX11. Non-diffuse gliomas were only rarely positive for any of the five markers tested. Our results indicate that immunohistochemical detection of EGFR, MEOX2, SOX11, and INSM1 can be useful for detection of glioblastoma cells in limited histological samples, especially when used in combination. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10417822/ /pubmed/37568909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152546 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Soukup, Jiri
Gerykova, Lucie
Rachelkar, Anjali
Hornychova, Helena
Bartos, Michael Christian
Krupa, Petr
Vitovcova, Barbora
Pleskacova, Zuzana
Kasparova, Petra
Dvorakova, Katerina
Skarkova, Veronika
Petera, Jiri
Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas
title Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas
title_full Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas
title_fullStr Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas
title_short Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas
title_sort diagnostic utility of immunohistochemical detection of meox2, sox11, insm1 and egfr in gliomas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568909
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152546
work_keys_str_mv AT soukupjiri diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT gerykovalucie diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT rachelkaranjali diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT hornychovahelena diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT bartosmichaelchristian diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT krupapetr diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT vitovcovabarbora diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT pleskacovazuzana diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT kasparovapetra diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT dvorakovakaterina diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT skarkovaveronika diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas
AT peterajiri diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas