Cargando…
Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas
Histological identification of dispersed glioma cells in small biopsies can be challenging, especially in tumours lacking the IDH1 R132H mutation or alterations in TP53. We postulated that immunohistochemical detection of proteins expressed preferentially in gliomas (EGFR, MEOX2, CD34) or during emb...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152546 |
_version_ | 1785088130971336704 |
---|---|
author | Soukup, Jiri Gerykova, Lucie Rachelkar, Anjali Hornychova, Helena Bartos, Michael Christian Krupa, Petr Vitovcova, Barbora Pleskacova, Zuzana Kasparova, Petra Dvorakova, Katerina Skarkova, Veronika Petera, Jiri |
author_facet | Soukup, Jiri Gerykova, Lucie Rachelkar, Anjali Hornychova, Helena Bartos, Michael Christian Krupa, Petr Vitovcova, Barbora Pleskacova, Zuzana Kasparova, Petra Dvorakova, Katerina Skarkova, Veronika Petera, Jiri |
author_sort | Soukup, Jiri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Histological identification of dispersed glioma cells in small biopsies can be challenging, especially in tumours lacking the IDH1 R132H mutation or alterations in TP53. We postulated that immunohistochemical detection of proteins expressed preferentially in gliomas (EGFR, MEOX2, CD34) or during embryonal development (SOX11, INSM1) can be used to distinguish reactive gliosis from glioma. Tissue microarrays of 46 reactive glioses, 81 glioblastomas, 34 IDH1-mutant diffuse gliomas, and 23 gliomas of other types were analysed. Glial neoplasms were significantly more often (p < 0.001, χ(2)) positive for EGFR (34.1% vs. 0%), MEOX2 (49.3% vs. 2.3%), SOX11 (70.5% vs. 20.4%), and INSM1 (65.4% vs. 2.3%). In 94.3% (66/70) of the glioblastomas, the expression of at least two markers was observed, while no reactive gliosis showed coexpression of any of the proteins. Compared to IDH1-mutant tumours, glioblastomas showed significantly higher expression of EGFR, MEOX2, and CD34 and significantly lower positivity for SOX11. Non-diffuse gliomas were only rarely positive for any of the five markers tested. Our results indicate that immunohistochemical detection of EGFR, MEOX2, SOX11, and INSM1 can be useful for detection of glioblastoma cells in limited histological samples, especially when used in combination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10417822 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104178222023-08-12 Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas Soukup, Jiri Gerykova, Lucie Rachelkar, Anjali Hornychova, Helena Bartos, Michael Christian Krupa, Petr Vitovcova, Barbora Pleskacova, Zuzana Kasparova, Petra Dvorakova, Katerina Skarkova, Veronika Petera, Jiri Diagnostics (Basel) Article Histological identification of dispersed glioma cells in small biopsies can be challenging, especially in tumours lacking the IDH1 R132H mutation or alterations in TP53. We postulated that immunohistochemical detection of proteins expressed preferentially in gliomas (EGFR, MEOX2, CD34) or during embryonal development (SOX11, INSM1) can be used to distinguish reactive gliosis from glioma. Tissue microarrays of 46 reactive glioses, 81 glioblastomas, 34 IDH1-mutant diffuse gliomas, and 23 gliomas of other types were analysed. Glial neoplasms were significantly more often (p < 0.001, χ(2)) positive for EGFR (34.1% vs. 0%), MEOX2 (49.3% vs. 2.3%), SOX11 (70.5% vs. 20.4%), and INSM1 (65.4% vs. 2.3%). In 94.3% (66/70) of the glioblastomas, the expression of at least two markers was observed, while no reactive gliosis showed coexpression of any of the proteins. Compared to IDH1-mutant tumours, glioblastomas showed significantly higher expression of EGFR, MEOX2, and CD34 and significantly lower positivity for SOX11. Non-diffuse gliomas were only rarely positive for any of the five markers tested. Our results indicate that immunohistochemical detection of EGFR, MEOX2, SOX11, and INSM1 can be useful for detection of glioblastoma cells in limited histological samples, especially when used in combination. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10417822/ /pubmed/37568909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152546 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Soukup, Jiri Gerykova, Lucie Rachelkar, Anjali Hornychova, Helena Bartos, Michael Christian Krupa, Petr Vitovcova, Barbora Pleskacova, Zuzana Kasparova, Petra Dvorakova, Katerina Skarkova, Veronika Petera, Jiri Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas |
title | Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas |
title_full | Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas |
title_short | Diagnostic Utility of Immunohistochemical Detection of MEOX2, SOX11, INSM1 and EGFR in Gliomas |
title_sort | diagnostic utility of immunohistochemical detection of meox2, sox11, insm1 and egfr in gliomas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10417822/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568909 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13152546 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soukupjiri diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT gerykovalucie diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT rachelkaranjali diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT hornychovahelena diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT bartosmichaelchristian diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT krupapetr diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT vitovcovabarbora diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT pleskacovazuzana diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT kasparovapetra diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT dvorakovakaterina diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT skarkovaveronika diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas AT peterajiri diagnosticutilityofimmunohistochemicaldetectionofmeox2sox11insm1andegfringliomas |