Cargando…

Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review

Purpose: To gather knowledge about effective return to work interventions for survivors of stroke. Methods: A database search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science using keywords and medical subject headings. Studies were included if they met the following criteria:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearce, Gemma, O’Donnell, Joan, Pimentel, Rebecca, Blake, Elizabeth, Mackenzie, Lynette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10418317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37569011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156469
_version_ 1785088234301161472
author Pearce, Gemma
O’Donnell, Joan
Pimentel, Rebecca
Blake, Elizabeth
Mackenzie, Lynette
author_facet Pearce, Gemma
O’Donnell, Joan
Pimentel, Rebecca
Blake, Elizabeth
Mackenzie, Lynette
author_sort Pearce, Gemma
collection PubMed
description Purpose: To gather knowledge about effective return to work interventions for survivors of stroke. Methods: A database search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science using keywords and medical subject headings. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (i) studies published in English since the year 2000; (ii) adult patients aged 18–65 with a primary diagnosis of stroke; (iii) working pre-stroke; and (iv) intervention in which one of the primary outcomes is return to work. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed and the evidence synthesised. Results: Twelve studies were included, of which three were randomised controlled trials, four were retrospective studies, one was a cohort study, one was an explorative longitudinal study, one was a pre-post treatment observation study and two were pilot studies. The employment rate at follow-up ranged from 7% to 75.6%. Overall, there was limited published evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to promote return to work for this population, and it was unclear if return to pre-stroke work was the goal. Conclusion: A lack of large, controlled trials, variations in follow-up time and the definitions of return to work accounted for the large range of employment rates at follow-up. There is limited published high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to promote return to work in working-age survivors of stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10418317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104183172023-08-12 Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review Pearce, Gemma O’Donnell, Joan Pimentel, Rebecca Blake, Elizabeth Mackenzie, Lynette Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Purpose: To gather knowledge about effective return to work interventions for survivors of stroke. Methods: A database search was conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Web of Science using keywords and medical subject headings. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: (i) studies published in English since the year 2000; (ii) adult patients aged 18–65 with a primary diagnosis of stroke; (iii) working pre-stroke; and (iv) intervention in which one of the primary outcomes is return to work. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed and the evidence synthesised. Results: Twelve studies were included, of which three were randomised controlled trials, four were retrospective studies, one was a cohort study, one was an explorative longitudinal study, one was a pre-post treatment observation study and two were pilot studies. The employment rate at follow-up ranged from 7% to 75.6%. Overall, there was limited published evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to promote return to work for this population, and it was unclear if return to pre-stroke work was the goal. Conclusion: A lack of large, controlled trials, variations in follow-up time and the definitions of return to work accounted for the large range of employment rates at follow-up. There is limited published high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of interventions to promote return to work in working-age survivors of stroke. MDPI 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10418317/ /pubmed/37569011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156469 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Pearce, Gemma
O’Donnell, Joan
Pimentel, Rebecca
Blake, Elizabeth
Mackenzie, Lynette
Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_full Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_short Interventions to Facilitate Return to Work after Stroke: A Systematic Review
title_sort interventions to facilitate return to work after stroke: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10418317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37569011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156469
work_keys_str_mv AT pearcegemma interventionstofacilitatereturntoworkafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT odonnelljoan interventionstofacilitatereturntoworkafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT pimentelrebecca interventionstofacilitatereturntoworkafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT blakeelizabeth interventionstofacilitatereturntoworkafterstrokeasystematicreview
AT mackenzielynette interventionstofacilitatereturntoworkafterstrokeasystematicreview