Cargando…
Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective To compare low doses of pethidine with dipyrone in labor analgesia. Methods In a randomized prospective study conducted by Universidade de Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, Brazil, between May and December 2016, 200 full-term parturients, with very painful uterine contractions and exhibiti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10418355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676509 |
_version_ | 1785088244012023808 |
---|---|
author | Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues Primo, André Montenegro |
author_facet | Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues Primo, André Montenegro |
author_sort | Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To compare low doses of pethidine with dipyrone in labor analgesia. Methods In a randomized prospective study conducted by Universidade de Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, Brazil, between May and December 2016, 200 full-term parturients, with very painful uterine contractions and exhibiting uterine cervix dilatation ≥ 5 cm, were selected to receive a single intravenous dose of either 0.25 mg/kg of pethidine (n = 100) or of 25 mg/kg of dipyrone (n = 100). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale. The data were analyzed using the Student t-test, the chi-square test and the likelihood ratio. Results There was a significant improvement in pain in 35% of the parturients. Both drugs presented a similar analgesic effect 1 hour after the intervention (p = 0.692). There was no analgesic effect during the evaluation of the second hour after the intervention with pethidine or dipyrone. There were no adverse effects, such as maternal drowsiness, nausea or vomiting, related to the drugs used. Conclusion Pethidine in low doses and dipyrone presented equivalent analgesia during labor. Public Registry of Clinical Trials RBR-4hsyy4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10418355 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104183552023-08-12 Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues Primo, André Montenegro Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To compare low doses of pethidine with dipyrone in labor analgesia. Methods In a randomized prospective study conducted by Universidade de Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, Brazil, between May and December 2016, 200 full-term parturients, with very painful uterine contractions and exhibiting uterine cervix dilatation ≥ 5 cm, were selected to receive a single intravenous dose of either 0.25 mg/kg of pethidine (n = 100) or of 25 mg/kg of dipyrone (n = 100). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale. The data were analyzed using the Student t-test, the chi-square test and the likelihood ratio. Results There was a significant improvement in pain in 35% of the parturients. Both drugs presented a similar analgesic effect 1 hour after the intervention (p = 0.692). There was no analgesic effect during the evaluation of the second hour after the intervention with pethidine or dipyrone. There were no adverse effects, such as maternal drowsiness, nausea or vomiting, related to the drugs used. Conclusion Pethidine in low doses and dipyrone presented equivalent analgesia during labor. Public Registry of Clinical Trials RBR-4hsyy4. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10418355/ /pubmed/30786304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676509 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues Primo, André Montenegro Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | pethidine in low doses versus dipyrone for pain relief in labor: a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10418355/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676509 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nunesrogevandorodrigues pethidineinlowdosesversusdipyroneforpainreliefinlaborarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT primoandremontenegro pethidineinlowdosesversusdipyroneforpainreliefinlaborarandomizedcontrolledtrial |