Cargando…

Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective To compare low doses of pethidine with dipyrone in labor analgesia. Methods In a randomized prospective study conducted by Universidade de Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, Brazil, between May and December 2016, 200 full-term parturients, with very painful uterine contractions and exhibiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues, Primo, André Montenegro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10418355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676509
_version_ 1785088244012023808
author Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues
Primo, André Montenegro
author_facet Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues
Primo, André Montenegro
author_sort Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues
collection PubMed
description Objective To compare low doses of pethidine with dipyrone in labor analgesia. Methods In a randomized prospective study conducted by Universidade de Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, Brazil, between May and December 2016, 200 full-term parturients, with very painful uterine contractions and exhibiting uterine cervix dilatation ≥ 5 cm, were selected to receive a single intravenous dose of either 0.25 mg/kg of pethidine (n = 100) or of 25 mg/kg of dipyrone (n = 100). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale. The data were analyzed using the Student t-test, the chi-square test and the likelihood ratio. Results There was a significant improvement in pain in 35% of the parturients. Both drugs presented a similar analgesic effect 1 hour after the intervention (p = 0.692). There was no analgesic effect during the evaluation of the second hour after the intervention with pethidine or dipyrone. There were no adverse effects, such as maternal drowsiness, nausea or vomiting, related to the drugs used. Conclusion Pethidine in low doses and dipyrone presented equivalent analgesia during labor. Public Registry of Clinical Trials RBR-4hsyy4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10418355
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104183552023-08-12 Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues Primo, André Montenegro Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet Objective To compare low doses of pethidine with dipyrone in labor analgesia. Methods In a randomized prospective study conducted by Universidade de Fortaleza, in the state of Ceará, Brazil, between May and December 2016, 200 full-term parturients, with very painful uterine contractions and exhibiting uterine cervix dilatation ≥ 5 cm, were selected to receive a single intravenous dose of either 0.25 mg/kg of pethidine (n = 100) or of 25 mg/kg of dipyrone (n = 100). Pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale. The data were analyzed using the Student t-test, the chi-square test and the likelihood ratio. Results There was a significant improvement in pain in 35% of the parturients. Both drugs presented a similar analgesic effect 1 hour after the intervention (p = 0.692). There was no analgesic effect during the evaluation of the second hour after the intervention with pethidine or dipyrone. There were no adverse effects, such as maternal drowsiness, nausea or vomiting, related to the drugs used. Conclusion Pethidine in low doses and dipyrone presented equivalent analgesia during labor. Public Registry of Clinical Trials RBR-4hsyy4. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10418355/ /pubmed/30786304 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676509 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Nunes, Rogevando Rodrigues
Primo, André Montenegro
Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Pethidine in Low Doses versus Dipyrone for Pain Relief in Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort pethidine in low doses versus dipyrone for pain relief in labor: a randomized controlled trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10418355/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30786304
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676509
work_keys_str_mv AT nunesrogevandorodrigues pethidineinlowdosesversusdipyroneforpainreliefinlaborarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT primoandremontenegro pethidineinlowdosesversusdipyroneforpainreliefinlaborarandomizedcontrolledtrial