Cargando…

Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can be debilitating and is one of the most common otological diseases. Steroids play an important role in its treatment. There are many ways to administer steroids, and the efficacy and safety of different administration routes remain unclear. This meta-anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deng, H.S., Hou, Y.W., Zhang, J.N., Yang, T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034494
_version_ 1785088518272319488
author Deng, H.S.
Hou, Y.W.
Zhang, J.N.
Yang, T.
author_facet Deng, H.S.
Hou, Y.W.
Zhang, J.N.
Yang, T.
author_sort Deng, H.S.
collection PubMed
description Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can be debilitating and is one of the most common otological diseases. Steroids play an important role in its treatment. There are many ways to administer steroids, and the efficacy and safety of different administration routes remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect and safety of different types of steroid delivery administration for the treatment of SSNHL. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched the Weipu, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature, National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on glucocorticoid treatments for SSNHL to compare the efficacy of postauricular injection and systemic steroid administration. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for data synthesis, which included the recovery rate (RR) of reported hearing improvement and change level in pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Subgroup analyses were performed based on different drugs, basic treatment, initial PTA, drug administration methods, onset time, and treatment course. Stata 15.1 software was used for analyses of publication bias and sensitivity. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 38 studies involving 3609 patients with SSNHL. In all included studies, the risk difference (RD) using reported improvement as an outcome measure was 0.12 for postauricular injection administration compared with systemic therapy (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.008, 0.16, P < .00001, I(2) = 59%). When examining PTA changes as an outcome measure (19 studies), the mean difference was 6.06 (95% CI = 3.96, 8.16, P < .00001, I(2) = 70%). The RD for hearing improvement was compared among different factors, and the results showed that postauricular injection is superior to systemic steroid administration. CONCLUSION: Postauricular injection may be safer and more effective treatment than systemic therapy as a treatment for SSNHL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10419441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104194412023-08-12 Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Deng, H.S. Hou, Y.W. Zhang, J.N. Yang, T. Medicine (Baltimore) 6000 Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) can be debilitating and is one of the most common otological diseases. Steroids play an important role in its treatment. There are many ways to administer steroids, and the efficacy and safety of different administration routes remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effect and safety of different types of steroid delivery administration for the treatment of SSNHL. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We searched the Weipu, Wanfang, Chinese Biomedical Literature, National Knowledge Infrastructure, Web of Science, Embase and PubMed databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on glucocorticoid treatments for SSNHL to compare the efficacy of postauricular injection and systemic steroid administration. Review Manager 5.4 software was used for data synthesis, which included the recovery rate (RR) of reported hearing improvement and change level in pure-tone audiometry (PTA). Subgroup analyses were performed based on different drugs, basic treatment, initial PTA, drug administration methods, onset time, and treatment course. Stata 15.1 software was used for analyses of publication bias and sensitivity. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 38 studies involving 3609 patients with SSNHL. In all included studies, the risk difference (RD) using reported improvement as an outcome measure was 0.12 for postauricular injection administration compared with systemic therapy (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.008, 0.16, P < .00001, I(2) = 59%). When examining PTA changes as an outcome measure (19 studies), the mean difference was 6.06 (95% CI = 3.96, 8.16, P < .00001, I(2) = 70%). The RD for hearing improvement was compared among different factors, and the results showed that postauricular injection is superior to systemic steroid administration. CONCLUSION: Postauricular injection may be safer and more effective treatment than systemic therapy as a treatment for SSNHL. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10419441/ /pubmed/37565890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034494 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle 6000
Deng, H.S.
Hou, Y.W.
Zhang, J.N.
Yang, T.
Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort postauricular versus systemic use of steroids for sudden hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic 6000
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034494
work_keys_str_mv AT denghs postauricularversussystemicuseofsteroidsforsuddenhearinglossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT houyw postauricularversussystemicuseofsteroidsforsuddenhearinglossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT zhangjn postauricularversussystemicuseofsteroidsforsuddenhearinglossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yangt postauricularversussystemicuseofsteroidsforsuddenhearinglossasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials