Cargando…

Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a new alternative surgical treatment for aortic pathologies, which is more minimally invasive. The aim of current study was to summarize the single-center experience of general anesthesia for patients undergoing TEVAR. In adult patients undergoing surge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ying-chun, Sun, Yan-ting, Yao, Yun-tai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034508
_version_ 1785088542016274432
author Liu, Ying-chun
Sun, Yan-ting
Yao, Yun-tai
author_facet Liu, Ying-chun
Sun, Yan-ting
Yao, Yun-tai
author_sort Liu, Ying-chun
collection PubMed
description Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a new alternative surgical treatment for aortic pathologies, which is more minimally invasive. The aim of current study was to summarize the single-center experience of general anesthesia for patients undergoing TEVAR. In adult patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease, the strategy of “fast-track” anesthesia with early extubation in theater is associated with a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and lower health-care-related costs. Fast-track anesthesia has not been assessed in patients under TEVAR. Adult patients who received general anesthesia for TEVAR in our center from January 2020 to December 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics, airway management, anesthetic techniques and major complications were collected. A total of 204 (171 male, mean age 58.1 ± 11.5 years) patients met inclusion criteria for this study. The distribution of pathologies included 29 descending thoracic aneurysms, 87 type B dissections, and 88 intramural hematoma/perforating aortic ulcer. Etomidate was the induction agent in 190 (93.1%) patients, compared with propofol in 16 (7.8%). Cisatracurium was the muscle relaxant in 201 (98.5%), compared with rocuronium in 3 (1.5%). Midazolam (benzodiazepines) was given to 124 (60.8%) patients during anesthesia induction. General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in 85.3% (174) patients, dexmedetomidine in 201 (98.5%) and propofol in 204 (100%). Postoperative length of stay (LOS) in the hospital was 6.0 (5.0–7.8) days. LOS in the ICU was 23.0 (20.0–27.8) hours. Overall neurologic event rate was 2.0% (n = 4) (spinal cord ischemia 1.5% [n = 3]; stroke 0.5% [n = 1]). After matching, patients who received “fast-track” anesthesia had a shorter LOS in ICUs (21.0 [18.0–24.0] vs 24.0 [20.0–44.0] hours; P = .005), and a shorter postoperative LOS in hospital (5.0 [4.0–7.0] vs 6.0 [5.0–8.0] days; P = .001). There were no in-hospital deaths. Fast-track anesthesia is feasible and safe in patients underwent TEVAR. This management strategy is associated with shorter LOS of ICU and total postoperative hospital stays. An early extubation strategy should be implemented for hemodynamically stable patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10419515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104195152023-08-12 Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center Liu, Ying-chun Sun, Yan-ting Yao, Yun-tai Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is a new alternative surgical treatment for aortic pathologies, which is more minimally invasive. The aim of current study was to summarize the single-center experience of general anesthesia for patients undergoing TEVAR. In adult patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease, the strategy of “fast-track” anesthesia with early extubation in theater is associated with a shorter intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and lower health-care-related costs. Fast-track anesthesia has not been assessed in patients under TEVAR. Adult patients who received general anesthesia for TEVAR in our center from January 2020 to December 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics, airway management, anesthetic techniques and major complications were collected. A total of 204 (171 male, mean age 58.1 ± 11.5 years) patients met inclusion criteria for this study. The distribution of pathologies included 29 descending thoracic aneurysms, 87 type B dissections, and 88 intramural hematoma/perforating aortic ulcer. Etomidate was the induction agent in 190 (93.1%) patients, compared with propofol in 16 (7.8%). Cisatracurium was the muscle relaxant in 201 (98.5%), compared with rocuronium in 3 (1.5%). Midazolam (benzodiazepines) was given to 124 (60.8%) patients during anesthesia induction. General anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in 85.3% (174) patients, dexmedetomidine in 201 (98.5%) and propofol in 204 (100%). Postoperative length of stay (LOS) in the hospital was 6.0 (5.0–7.8) days. LOS in the ICU was 23.0 (20.0–27.8) hours. Overall neurologic event rate was 2.0% (n = 4) (spinal cord ischemia 1.5% [n = 3]; stroke 0.5% [n = 1]). After matching, patients who received “fast-track” anesthesia had a shorter LOS in ICUs (21.0 [18.0–24.0] vs 24.0 [20.0–44.0] hours; P = .005), and a shorter postoperative LOS in hospital (5.0 [4.0–7.0] vs 6.0 [5.0–8.0] days; P = .001). There were no in-hospital deaths. Fast-track anesthesia is feasible and safe in patients underwent TEVAR. This management strategy is associated with shorter LOS of ICU and total postoperative hospital stays. An early extubation strategy should be implemented for hemodynamically stable patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10419515/ /pubmed/37565902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034508 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 3300
Liu, Ying-chun
Sun, Yan-ting
Yao, Yun-tai
Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center
title Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center
title_full Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center
title_fullStr Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center
title_short Anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A retrospective analysis of single center
title_sort anesthesia management of patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair: a retrospective analysis of single center
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565902
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034508
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyingchun anesthesiamanagementofpatientsundergoingthoracicendovascularaorticrepairaretrospectiveanalysisofsinglecenter
AT sunyanting anesthesiamanagementofpatientsundergoingthoracicendovascularaorticrepairaretrospectiveanalysisofsinglecenter
AT yaoyuntai anesthesiamanagementofpatientsundergoingthoracicendovascularaorticrepairaretrospectiveanalysisofsinglecenter