Cargando…

Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review

Background: Different methods are used for the analysis of marginal and internal fit of partial crowns, but not all of them are applicable for in vivo studies. The aim of this review is to search the available methods, described in the current literature, to assess marginal and internal fit in parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Fiore, Adolfo, Zuccon, Andrea, Carraro, Filippo, Basilicata, Michele, Bollero, Patrizio, Bruno, Giovanni, Stellini, Edoardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155048
_version_ 1785088574143594496
author Di Fiore, Adolfo
Zuccon, Andrea
Carraro, Filippo
Basilicata, Michele
Bollero, Patrizio
Bruno, Giovanni
Stellini, Edoardo
author_facet Di Fiore, Adolfo
Zuccon, Andrea
Carraro, Filippo
Basilicata, Michele
Bollero, Patrizio
Bruno, Giovanni
Stellini, Edoardo
author_sort Di Fiore, Adolfo
collection PubMed
description Background: Different methods are used for the analysis of marginal and internal fit of partial crowns, but not all of them are applicable for in vivo studies. The aim of this review is to search the available methods, described in the current literature, to assess marginal and internal fit in partial crowns. Methods: an electronic search was performed on Pubmed and Web of Science databases to find studies published from 1 January 2017 up to 2 March 2023, following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews. The search strategy applied was: “(marginal) AND (fit OR gap OR adaptation OR discrepancy) AND (inlay OR onlay OR partial crown)”. In vitro studies which evaluated marginal and internal fit on CAD CAM or 3D printed partial crowns were included in this review. Quality of the studies was assessed by using Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (QUIN tool). Results: 22 studies were included. Among conventional methods, direct view with microscope, indirect view on resin replicas, and silicone replica technique (SRT) were used. Considering new digital methods, micro-CT, SRT 3D and triple scan technique (TST) were applied. Conclusions: Among 2D methods, direct view technique is the most used marginal fit analysis. For a more comprehensive evaluation, a 3D digital analysis is suggested. SRT and indirect view are the only 2D methods available for in vivo analysis. A protocol for the application of TST for assessment in vivo is now available, but no studies are reported in literature yet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10419640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104196402023-08-12 Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review Di Fiore, Adolfo Zuccon, Andrea Carraro, Filippo Basilicata, Michele Bollero, Patrizio Bruno, Giovanni Stellini, Edoardo J Clin Med Review Background: Different methods are used for the analysis of marginal and internal fit of partial crowns, but not all of them are applicable for in vivo studies. The aim of this review is to search the available methods, described in the current literature, to assess marginal and internal fit in partial crowns. Methods: an electronic search was performed on Pubmed and Web of Science databases to find studies published from 1 January 2017 up to 2 March 2023, following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews. The search strategy applied was: “(marginal) AND (fit OR gap OR adaptation OR discrepancy) AND (inlay OR onlay OR partial crown)”. In vitro studies which evaluated marginal and internal fit on CAD CAM or 3D printed partial crowns were included in this review. Quality of the studies was assessed by using Quality Assessment Tool For In Vitro Studies (QUIN tool). Results: 22 studies were included. Among conventional methods, direct view with microscope, indirect view on resin replicas, and silicone replica technique (SRT) were used. Considering new digital methods, micro-CT, SRT 3D and triple scan technique (TST) were applied. Conclusions: Among 2D methods, direct view technique is the most used marginal fit analysis. For a more comprehensive evaluation, a 3D digital analysis is suggested. SRT and indirect view are the only 2D methods available for in vivo analysis. A protocol for the application of TST for assessment in vivo is now available, but no studies are reported in literature yet. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10419640/ /pubmed/37568450 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155048 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Di Fiore, Adolfo
Zuccon, Andrea
Carraro, Filippo
Basilicata, Michele
Bollero, Patrizio
Bruno, Giovanni
Stellini, Edoardo
Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review
title Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review
title_full Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review
title_short Assessment Methods for Marginal and Internal Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review
title_sort assessment methods for marginal and internal fit of partial crown restorations: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568450
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155048
work_keys_str_mv AT difioreadolfo assessmentmethodsformarginalandinternalfitofpartialcrownrestorationsasystematicreview
AT zucconandrea assessmentmethodsformarginalandinternalfitofpartialcrownrestorationsasystematicreview
AT carrarofilippo assessmentmethodsformarginalandinternalfitofpartialcrownrestorationsasystematicreview
AT basilicatamichele assessmentmethodsformarginalandinternalfitofpartialcrownrestorationsasystematicreview
AT bolleropatrizio assessmentmethodsformarginalandinternalfitofpartialcrownrestorationsasystematicreview
AT brunogiovanni assessmentmethodsformarginalandinternalfitofpartialcrownrestorationsasystematicreview
AT stelliniedoardo assessmentmethodsformarginalandinternalfitofpartialcrownrestorationsasystematicreview