Cargando…

Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Songbai, Ma, Hongjie, Zhao, Congling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
_version_ 1785088574382669824
author Chen, Songbai
Ma, Hongjie
Zhao, Congling
author_facet Chen, Songbai
Ma, Hongjie
Zhao, Congling
author_sort Chen, Songbai
collection PubMed
description Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. METHODS: The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration’s “risk of bias” tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: −0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, −0.02; 95% CI: −0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, −0.01; 95% CI: −0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: −0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, −7.91; 95% CI: −17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: −0.26, 0.27; P = .96). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10419641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104196412023-08-12 Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Songbai Ma, Hongjie Zhao, Congling Medicine (Baltimore) 5800 Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) have been extensively studied as the main surgical methods for corneal refractive surgery. However, there is no consensus on whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis used the results of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST to explore whether SMILE is superior to FS-LASIK in corneal biomechanics. METHODS: The literature was searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and Controlled Trials Register databases. The Cochrane Collaboration’s “risk of bias” tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included randomized clinical trials, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the included non-randomized controlled trials. The results were analyzed using Revman 5.3. RESULTS: Sixteen studies (3 randomized clinical trials and 13 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference in corneal biomechanics between SMILE and FS-LASIK in corneal hysteresis [mean difference (MD), 0.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): −0.09, 0.49; P = .18] and corneal resistant factor (MD, 0.31; 95% CI: −0.09, 0.71; P = .13), A1 time (MD, −0.02; 95% CI: −0.11, 0.07; P = .66), A1 length (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.03; P = .42), A1 velocity (MD, 0.00; 95% CI: −0.01, 0.01; P = .85), A2 velocity (MD, −0.01; 95% CI: −0.11, 0.09; P = .86), HC time (MD, 0.12; 95% CI: −0.13, 0.38; P = .35), The stiffness parameter at first applanation (MD, −7.91; 95% CI: −17.96, 2.14; P = .12), The ratio between the deformation amplitude 2 mm away from apex and the apical deformation (MD, 0.01; 95% CI: −0.26, 0.27; P = .96). CONCLUSION: A comprehensive assessment of the parameters of ocular response analyzer and corvis ST showed that SMILE is not superior to LASIK in corneal biomechanics 3 months post-surgery. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC10419641/ /pubmed/37565903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034580 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 5800
Chen, Songbai
Ma, Hongjie
Zhao, Congling
Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort corneal biomechanics after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic 5800
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37565903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000034580
work_keys_str_mv AT chensongbai cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionandfemtosecondlaserinsitukeratomileusisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mahongjie cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionandfemtosecondlaserinsitukeratomileusisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhaocongling cornealbiomechanicsaftersmallincisionlenticuleextractionandfemtosecondlaserinsitukeratomileusisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis