Cargando…

The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides

This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-printed surgical guides before and after sterilization in a steam sterilizer. A test-model incorporating three implant replicas was customized. A total of forty guides were printed from five printable resins. A group made from a self-curing com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazigi, Christine, Chaar, M. Sad, Busch, Reinhard, Kern, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37570008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16155305
_version_ 1785088576087654400
author Yazigi, Christine
Chaar, M. Sad
Busch, Reinhard
Kern, Matthias
author_facet Yazigi, Christine
Chaar, M. Sad
Busch, Reinhard
Kern, Matthias
author_sort Yazigi, Christine
collection PubMed
description This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-printed surgical guides before and after sterilization in a steam sterilizer. A test-model incorporating three implant replicas was customized. A total of forty guides were printed from five printable resins. A group made from a self-curing composite served as control group. The guides were checked for fit. Vertical discrepancies between the model and guides were measured at standardized points at a load of 500 g (P1). The guides were connected to implant replicas and scanned, and their angles were digitally measured. The specimens were sterilized in a steam sterilizer at 121 °C for 20 min at 2 bar pressure. Vertical discrepancies (P2) and angulations were remeasured. Additionally, the specimens were repositioned with an increased load, and measurements were repeated (P3). All specimens were repositionable after sterilization. The smallest variation in discrepancy at a 500 g load was 428 µm, whereas the greatest was 1487 µm. Under an increased force, the smallest change was 94 µm, while the greatest was 260 µm. The level of significance α = 0.05 (95% confidence interval) was set for all tests. The variation in the measured angles was not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis’s test, p > 0.05). The accuracy was affected by the material and sterilization, but it was clinically acceptable when an increased load was applied during repositioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10419648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104196482023-08-12 The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides Yazigi, Christine Chaar, M. Sad Busch, Reinhard Kern, Matthias Materials (Basel) Article This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of 3D-printed surgical guides before and after sterilization in a steam sterilizer. A test-model incorporating three implant replicas was customized. A total of forty guides were printed from five printable resins. A group made from a self-curing composite served as control group. The guides were checked for fit. Vertical discrepancies between the model and guides were measured at standardized points at a load of 500 g (P1). The guides were connected to implant replicas and scanned, and their angles were digitally measured. The specimens were sterilized in a steam sterilizer at 121 °C for 20 min at 2 bar pressure. Vertical discrepancies (P2) and angulations were remeasured. Additionally, the specimens were repositioned with an increased load, and measurements were repeated (P3). All specimens were repositionable after sterilization. The smallest variation in discrepancy at a 500 g load was 428 µm, whereas the greatest was 1487 µm. Under an increased force, the smallest change was 94 µm, while the greatest was 260 µm. The level of significance α = 0.05 (95% confidence interval) was set for all tests. The variation in the measured angles was not statistically significant (Kruskal–Wallis’s test, p > 0.05). The accuracy was affected by the material and sterilization, but it was clinically acceptable when an increased load was applied during repositioning. MDPI 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10419648/ /pubmed/37570008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16155305 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yazigi, Christine
Chaar, M. Sad
Busch, Reinhard
Kern, Matthias
The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides
title The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides
title_full The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides
title_fullStr The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides
title_short The Effect of Sterilization on the Accuracy and Fit of 3D-Printed Surgical Guides
title_sort effect of sterilization on the accuracy and fit of 3d-printed surgical guides
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37570008
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16155305
work_keys_str_mv AT yazigichristine theeffectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides
AT chaarmsad theeffectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides
AT buschreinhard theeffectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides
AT kernmatthias theeffectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides
AT yazigichristine effectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides
AT chaarmsad effectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides
AT buschreinhard effectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides
AT kernmatthias effectofsterilizationontheaccuracyandfitof3dprintedsurgicalguides