Cargando…
Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study
AIMS: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576099 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22 |
_version_ | 1785088601822855168 |
---|---|
author | Sakai, Yusuke Monzen, Hajime Takei, Yoshiki Kosaka, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Kenji Yanagi, Yuya Wakabayashi, Kazuki Hosono, Makoto Nishimura, Yasumasa |
author_facet | Sakai, Yusuke Monzen, Hajime Takei, Yoshiki Kosaka, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Kenji Yanagi, Yuya Wakabayashi, Kazuki Hosono, Makoto Nishimura, Yasumasa |
author_sort | Sakai, Yusuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDI(w)) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively. RESULTS: For head and pelvic protocols, CBDI(w) values ranged from 0.94–6.59 and 1.47–20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3–34.0 and 26.9–97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (r = −0.33 and −0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10419753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104197532023-08-12 Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study Sakai, Yusuke Monzen, Hajime Takei, Yoshiki Kosaka, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Kenji Yanagi, Yuya Wakabayashi, Kazuki Hosono, Makoto Nishimura, Yasumasa J Med Phys Original Article AIMS: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDI(w)) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively. RESULTS: For head and pelvic protocols, CBDI(w) values ranged from 0.94–6.59 and 1.47–20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3–34.0 and 26.9–97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (r = −0.33 and −0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10419753/ /pubmed/37576099 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Medical Physics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sakai, Yusuke Monzen, Hajime Takei, Yoshiki Kosaka, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Kenji Yanagi, Yuya Wakabayashi, Kazuki Hosono, Makoto Nishimura, Yasumasa Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study |
title | Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study |
title_full | Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study |
title_short | Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study |
title_sort | evaluation of in-room volumetric imaging doses for image-guided radiotherapy: a multi-institutional study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576099 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sakaiyusuke evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT monzenhajime evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT takeiyoshiki evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT kosakahiroyuki evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT nakamurakenji evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT yanagiyuya evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT wakabayashikazuki evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT hosonomakoto evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy AT nishimurayasumasa evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy |