Cargando…

Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study

AIMS: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakai, Yusuke, Monzen, Hajime, Takei, Yoshiki, Kosaka, Hiroyuki, Nakamura, Kenji, Yanagi, Yuya, Wakabayashi, Kazuki, Hosono, Makoto, Nishimura, Yasumasa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576099
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22
_version_ 1785088601822855168
author Sakai, Yusuke
Monzen, Hajime
Takei, Yoshiki
Kosaka, Hiroyuki
Nakamura, Kenji
Yanagi, Yuya
Wakabayashi, Kazuki
Hosono, Makoto
Nishimura, Yasumasa
author_facet Sakai, Yusuke
Monzen, Hajime
Takei, Yoshiki
Kosaka, Hiroyuki
Nakamura, Kenji
Yanagi, Yuya
Wakabayashi, Kazuki
Hosono, Makoto
Nishimura, Yasumasa
author_sort Sakai, Yusuke
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDI(w)) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively. RESULTS: For head and pelvic protocols, CBDI(w) values ranged from 0.94–6.59 and 1.47–20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3–34.0 and 26.9–97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (r = −0.33 and −0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10419753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104197532023-08-12 Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study Sakai, Yusuke Monzen, Hajime Takei, Yoshiki Kosaka, Hiroyuki Nakamura, Kenji Yanagi, Yuya Wakabayashi, Kazuki Hosono, Makoto Nishimura, Yasumasa J Med Phys Original Article AIMS: We investigated imaging dose and noise under clinical scan conditions at multiple institutions using a simple and unified method, and demonstrated the need for diagnostic reference levels in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine cone-beam and helical computed tomography (CT) scanners (Varian, Elekta, Accuray Inc., and BrainLAB) from seven institutions were investigated in this study. The weighted cone-beam dose index (CBDI(w)) was calculated for head and pelvic protocols using a 100 mm pencil chamber under the conditions used in actual clinical practice at each institution. Cone-beam CT image noise was evaluated using polymethylmethacrylate head and body phantoms with diameters of 16 and 32 cm, respectively. RESULTS: For head and pelvic protocols, CBDI(w) values ranged from 0.94–6.59 and 1.47–20.9 mGy, respectively. Similarly, standard deviation (SD) values ranged from 9.3–34.0 and 26.9–97.4 HU, respectively. The SD values tended to increase with decreasing imaging dose (r = −0.33 and −0.61 for the head and pelvic protocols, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among the nine machines, the imaging dose for high imaging dose institutions was approximately 20 mGy to the pelvic phantom, and there was a 14-fold difference in dose compared with the other institutions. These results suggest the need to establish DRLs for IGRT to guide clinical decision-making. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023 2023-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10419753/ /pubmed/37576099 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Medical Physics https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sakai, Yusuke
Monzen, Hajime
Takei, Yoshiki
Kosaka, Hiroyuki
Nakamura, Kenji
Yanagi, Yuya
Wakabayashi, Kazuki
Hosono, Makoto
Nishimura, Yasumasa
Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study
title Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study
title_full Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study
title_short Evaluation of In-room Volumetric Imaging Doses for Image-guided Radiotherapy: A Multi-institutional Study
title_sort evaluation of in-room volumetric imaging doses for image-guided radiotherapy: a multi-institutional study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37576099
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_109_22
work_keys_str_mv AT sakaiyusuke evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT monzenhajime evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT takeiyoshiki evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT kosakahiroyuki evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT nakamurakenji evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT yanagiyuya evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT wakabayashikazuki evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT hosonomakoto evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy
AT nishimurayasumasa evaluationofinroomvolumetricimagingdosesforimageguidedradiotherapyamultiinstitutionalstudy