Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials

Lignocellulosic materials are usually processed toward C5 and C6 corresponding sugars. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is a pretreatment method to solubilize hemicellulose to sugars such xylose without degrading cellulose. However, this pretreatment has not been compared to other processes. Thus, this pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara, Baumberger, Stéphanie, Cézard, Laurent, Poveda-Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro, Alzate-Ramírez, Andrés Felipe, Cardona Alzate, Carlos Ariel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37570205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16155502
_version_ 1785088629234728960
author Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara
Baumberger, Stéphanie
Cézard, Laurent
Poveda-Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro
Alzate-Ramírez, Andrés Felipe
Cardona Alzate, Carlos Ariel
author_facet Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara
Baumberger, Stéphanie
Cézard, Laurent
Poveda-Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro
Alzate-Ramírez, Andrés Felipe
Cardona Alzate, Carlos Ariel
author_sort Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara
collection PubMed
description Lignocellulosic materials are usually processed toward C5 and C6 corresponding sugars. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is a pretreatment method to solubilize hemicellulose to sugars such xylose without degrading cellulose. However, this pretreatment has not been compared to other processes. Thus, this paper focuses on the techno-economic comparison of the C5–C6 production of C5–C6 as raw materials platforms using non-centrifuged sugarcane bagasse (NCSB) and Pinus patula wood chips (PP). Hydrolysates using TFA 2.5 M as an acid were characterized through HPLC regarding arabinose, galactose glucose, xylose, and mannose sugars. Then, simulations of the processes according to the experimental results were done. The economic assessment was performed, and compared with some common pretreatments. The mass and energy balances of the simulations indicate that the process can be compared with other pretreatments. From the economic perspective, the main operating expenditures (OpEx) are related to raw materials and capital depreciation due to the cost of TFA corrosion issues. The processes showed a CapEx and OpEx of 0.99 MUSD and 6.59 M-USD/year for NCSB, and 0.97 MUSD and 4.37 MUSD/year for PP, considering a small-scale base (1 ton/h). TFA pretreatment is innovative and promising from a techno-economic perspective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10419856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104198562023-08-12 Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara Baumberger, Stéphanie Cézard, Laurent Poveda-Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro Alzate-Ramírez, Andrés Felipe Cardona Alzate, Carlos Ariel Materials (Basel) Article Lignocellulosic materials are usually processed toward C5 and C6 corresponding sugars. Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) is a pretreatment method to solubilize hemicellulose to sugars such xylose without degrading cellulose. However, this pretreatment has not been compared to other processes. Thus, this paper focuses on the techno-economic comparison of the C5–C6 production of C5–C6 as raw materials platforms using non-centrifuged sugarcane bagasse (NCSB) and Pinus patula wood chips (PP). Hydrolysates using TFA 2.5 M as an acid were characterized through HPLC regarding arabinose, galactose glucose, xylose, and mannose sugars. Then, simulations of the processes according to the experimental results were done. The economic assessment was performed, and compared with some common pretreatments. The mass and energy balances of the simulations indicate that the process can be compared with other pretreatments. From the economic perspective, the main operating expenditures (OpEx) are related to raw materials and capital depreciation due to the cost of TFA corrosion issues. The processes showed a CapEx and OpEx of 0.99 MUSD and 6.59 M-USD/year for NCSB, and 0.97 MUSD and 4.37 MUSD/year for PP, considering a small-scale base (1 ton/h). TFA pretreatment is innovative and promising from a techno-economic perspective. MDPI 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10419856/ /pubmed/37570205 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16155502 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Piedrahita-Rodríguez, Sara
Baumberger, Stéphanie
Cézard, Laurent
Poveda-Giraldo, Jhonny Alejandro
Alzate-Ramírez, Andrés Felipe
Cardona Alzate, Carlos Ariel
Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials
title Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials
title_full Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials
title_short Comparative Analysis of Trifluoracetic Acid Pretreatment for Lignocellulosic Materials
title_sort comparative analysis of trifluoracetic acid pretreatment for lignocellulosic materials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10419856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37570205
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16155502
work_keys_str_mv AT piedrahitarodriguezsara comparativeanalysisoftrifluoraceticacidpretreatmentforlignocellulosicmaterials
AT baumbergerstephanie comparativeanalysisoftrifluoraceticacidpretreatmentforlignocellulosicmaterials
AT cezardlaurent comparativeanalysisoftrifluoraceticacidpretreatmentforlignocellulosicmaterials
AT povedagiraldojhonnyalejandro comparativeanalysisoftrifluoraceticacidpretreatmentforlignocellulosicmaterials
AT alzateramirezandresfelipe comparativeanalysisoftrifluoraceticacidpretreatmentforlignocellulosicmaterials
AT cardonaalzatecarlosariel comparativeanalysisoftrifluoraceticacidpretreatmentforlignocellulosicmaterials