Cargando…

Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool

For general practitioners (GPs), it may be challenging to assess suicidal ideation (SI) in patients. Although promising instruments exist for the use in primary care, only a few have been validated in German. The objectives of this study were to examine the validity of the brief P4 screener for asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schluessel, Sabine, Halfter, Kathrin, Haas, Carolin, Kroenke, Kurt, Lukaschek, Karoline, Gensichen, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10420186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155047
_version_ 1785088715389927424
author Schluessel, Sabine
Halfter, Kathrin
Haas, Carolin
Kroenke, Kurt
Lukaschek, Karoline
Gensichen, Jochen
author_facet Schluessel, Sabine
Halfter, Kathrin
Haas, Carolin
Kroenke, Kurt
Lukaschek, Karoline
Gensichen, Jochen
author_sort Schluessel, Sabine
collection PubMed
description For general practitioners (GPs), it may be challenging to assess suicidal ideation (SI) in patients. Although promising instruments exist for the use in primary care, only a few have been validated in German. The objectives of this study were to examine the validity of the brief P4 screener for assessing SI in a cross-sectional study including outpatients. Inclusion criteria were a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 or an affirmative answer to its SI item. Construct validity of the P4 was examined by comparison with the four-item Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R), the PHQ-9 (convergent), and the positive mental health (PMH) scale (divergent). The study sample included 223 patients (mean age 47.61 ± 15 years; 61.9% women) from 20 primary care practices (104 patients) and 10 psychiatric/psychotherapeutic clinics (119 patients). The first three items of the P4 correlate positively with most of the four items of the reference standard SBQ-R (convergent validity); the fourth item of the P4 (preventive factors) correlates significantly with the PMH scale. The most common preventive factor (67%) is family or friends. The German P4 screener can be used to assess SI in outpatient care. It explores preventive or protective factors of suicide, which may support the GP’s decision on treatment. We recommend a further clinical interview for patients flagged by P4 assessment in order to more formally assess suicidal risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10420186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104201862023-08-12 Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool Schluessel, Sabine Halfter, Kathrin Haas, Carolin Kroenke, Kurt Lukaschek, Karoline Gensichen, Jochen J Clin Med Article For general practitioners (GPs), it may be challenging to assess suicidal ideation (SI) in patients. Although promising instruments exist for the use in primary care, only a few have been validated in German. The objectives of this study were to examine the validity of the brief P4 screener for assessing SI in a cross-sectional study including outpatients. Inclusion criteria were a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 or an affirmative answer to its SI item. Construct validity of the P4 was examined by comparison with the four-item Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R), the PHQ-9 (convergent), and the positive mental health (PMH) scale (divergent). The study sample included 223 patients (mean age 47.61 ± 15 years; 61.9% women) from 20 primary care practices (104 patients) and 10 psychiatric/psychotherapeutic clinics (119 patients). The first three items of the P4 correlate positively with most of the four items of the reference standard SBQ-R (convergent validity); the fourth item of the P4 (preventive factors) correlates significantly with the PMH scale. The most common preventive factor (67%) is family or friends. The German P4 screener can be used to assess SI in outpatient care. It explores preventive or protective factors of suicide, which may support the GP’s decision on treatment. We recommend a further clinical interview for patients flagged by P4 assessment in order to more formally assess suicidal risk. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10420186/ /pubmed/37568448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155047 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schluessel, Sabine
Halfter, Kathrin
Haas, Carolin
Kroenke, Kurt
Lukaschek, Karoline
Gensichen, Jochen
Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
title Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
title_full Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
title_fullStr Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
title_short Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
title_sort validation of the german version of the p4 suicidality tool
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10420186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568448
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155047
work_keys_str_mv AT schluesselsabine validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool
AT halfterkathrin validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool
AT haascarolin validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool
AT kroenkekurt validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool
AT lukaschekkaroline validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool
AT gensichenjochen validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool