Cargando…
Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool
For general practitioners (GPs), it may be challenging to assess suicidal ideation (SI) in patients. Although promising instruments exist for the use in primary care, only a few have been validated in German. The objectives of this study were to examine the validity of the brief P4 screener for asse...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10420186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155047 |
_version_ | 1785088715389927424 |
---|---|
author | Schluessel, Sabine Halfter, Kathrin Haas, Carolin Kroenke, Kurt Lukaschek, Karoline Gensichen, Jochen |
author_facet | Schluessel, Sabine Halfter, Kathrin Haas, Carolin Kroenke, Kurt Lukaschek, Karoline Gensichen, Jochen |
author_sort | Schluessel, Sabine |
collection | PubMed |
description | For general practitioners (GPs), it may be challenging to assess suicidal ideation (SI) in patients. Although promising instruments exist for the use in primary care, only a few have been validated in German. The objectives of this study were to examine the validity of the brief P4 screener for assessing SI in a cross-sectional study including outpatients. Inclusion criteria were a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 or an affirmative answer to its SI item. Construct validity of the P4 was examined by comparison with the four-item Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R), the PHQ-9 (convergent), and the positive mental health (PMH) scale (divergent). The study sample included 223 patients (mean age 47.61 ± 15 years; 61.9% women) from 20 primary care practices (104 patients) and 10 psychiatric/psychotherapeutic clinics (119 patients). The first three items of the P4 correlate positively with most of the four items of the reference standard SBQ-R (convergent validity); the fourth item of the P4 (preventive factors) correlates significantly with the PMH scale. The most common preventive factor (67%) is family or friends. The German P4 screener can be used to assess SI in outpatient care. It explores preventive or protective factors of suicide, which may support the GP’s decision on treatment. We recommend a further clinical interview for patients flagged by P4 assessment in order to more formally assess suicidal risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10420186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104201862023-08-12 Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool Schluessel, Sabine Halfter, Kathrin Haas, Carolin Kroenke, Kurt Lukaschek, Karoline Gensichen, Jochen J Clin Med Article For general practitioners (GPs), it may be challenging to assess suicidal ideation (SI) in patients. Although promising instruments exist for the use in primary care, only a few have been validated in German. The objectives of this study were to examine the validity of the brief P4 screener for assessing SI in a cross-sectional study including outpatients. Inclusion criteria were a PHQ-9 score ≥ 10 or an affirmative answer to its SI item. Construct validity of the P4 was examined by comparison with the four-item Suicide Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R), the PHQ-9 (convergent), and the positive mental health (PMH) scale (divergent). The study sample included 223 patients (mean age 47.61 ± 15 years; 61.9% women) from 20 primary care practices (104 patients) and 10 psychiatric/psychotherapeutic clinics (119 patients). The first three items of the P4 correlate positively with most of the four items of the reference standard SBQ-R (convergent validity); the fourth item of the P4 (preventive factors) correlates significantly with the PMH scale. The most common preventive factor (67%) is family or friends. The German P4 screener can be used to assess SI in outpatient care. It explores preventive or protective factors of suicide, which may support the GP’s decision on treatment. We recommend a further clinical interview for patients flagged by P4 assessment in order to more formally assess suicidal risk. MDPI 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10420186/ /pubmed/37568448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155047 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Schluessel, Sabine Halfter, Kathrin Haas, Carolin Kroenke, Kurt Lukaschek, Karoline Gensichen, Jochen Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool |
title | Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool |
title_full | Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool |
title_fullStr | Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool |
title_short | Validation of the German Version of the P4 Suicidality Tool |
title_sort | validation of the german version of the p4 suicidality tool |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10420186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568448 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schluesselsabine validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool AT halfterkathrin validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool AT haascarolin validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool AT kroenkekurt validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool AT lukaschekkaroline validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool AT gensichenjochen validationofthegermanversionofthep4suicidalitytool |