Cargando…
Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound
Breast conservative surgery is the primary therapeutic choice for non-aggressive early breast cancers, and a minimally-invasive approach is strongly recommended. The breast localization represents a modern challenge for surgery. Wire-guided localization is still the gold standard technique, but new...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10420256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155076 |
_version_ | 1785088733659267072 |
---|---|
author | Parisi, Simona Gambardella, Claudio Conzo, Giovanni Ruggiero, Roberto Tolone, Salvatore Lucido, Francesco Saverio Iovino, Francesco Fisone, Francesca Brusciano, Luigi Parmeggiani, Domenico Docimo, Ludovico |
author_facet | Parisi, Simona Gambardella, Claudio Conzo, Giovanni Ruggiero, Roberto Tolone, Salvatore Lucido, Francesco Saverio Iovino, Francesco Fisone, Francesca Brusciano, Luigi Parmeggiani, Domenico Docimo, Ludovico |
author_sort | Parisi, Simona |
collection | PubMed |
description | Breast conservative surgery is the primary therapeutic choice for non-aggressive early breast cancers, and a minimally-invasive approach is strongly recommended. The breast localization represents a modern challenge for surgery. Wire-guided localization is still the gold standard technique, but new wireless systems have been proposed, such as radiofrequency identification with LOCalizer(TM) (Hologic, Santa Carla, CA, USA), which reports encouraging results. The current study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the combined use of LOCalizer(TM) and ultrasound compared with the results obtained using LOCalizer(TM) alone for the detection of non-palpable breast cancer. Ninety-six patients who were candidates for breast localization were enrolled. Group A received a combined localization with LOCalizer(TM) and US, while group B underwent only LOCalizer(TM) identification. Oncological radicality was reached in 100% of the patients in Group A and in 89.2% of the patients in Group B, with p = 0.006. The mean specimens’ volume was 13.2 ± 0.6 cm(3) for Group A and 16.1 ± 1.4 cm(3) for Group B, while mean specimen weights were 21.8 ± 2.2 and 24.4 ± 1.8 g, respectively (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). LOCalizer(TM) with ultrasound, in the current series, has resulted in the preferred option for the localization of non-palpable breast cancer, allowing limited resection (in weight and volume), guaranteeing excellent oncological outcomes, and great satisfaction for patients and physicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10420256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104202562023-08-12 Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound Parisi, Simona Gambardella, Claudio Conzo, Giovanni Ruggiero, Roberto Tolone, Salvatore Lucido, Francesco Saverio Iovino, Francesco Fisone, Francesca Brusciano, Luigi Parmeggiani, Domenico Docimo, Ludovico J Clin Med Article Breast conservative surgery is the primary therapeutic choice for non-aggressive early breast cancers, and a minimally-invasive approach is strongly recommended. The breast localization represents a modern challenge for surgery. Wire-guided localization is still the gold standard technique, but new wireless systems have been proposed, such as radiofrequency identification with LOCalizer(TM) (Hologic, Santa Carla, CA, USA), which reports encouraging results. The current study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and efficacy of the combined use of LOCalizer(TM) and ultrasound compared with the results obtained using LOCalizer(TM) alone for the detection of non-palpable breast cancer. Ninety-six patients who were candidates for breast localization were enrolled. Group A received a combined localization with LOCalizer(TM) and US, while group B underwent only LOCalizer(TM) identification. Oncological radicality was reached in 100% of the patients in Group A and in 89.2% of the patients in Group B, with p = 0.006. The mean specimens’ volume was 13.2 ± 0.6 cm(3) for Group A and 16.1 ± 1.4 cm(3) for Group B, while mean specimen weights were 21.8 ± 2.2 and 24.4 ± 1.8 g, respectively (p = 0.003 and p = 0.004, respectively). LOCalizer(TM) with ultrasound, in the current series, has resulted in the preferred option for the localization of non-palpable breast cancer, allowing limited resection (in weight and volume), guaranteeing excellent oncological outcomes, and great satisfaction for patients and physicians. MDPI 2023-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10420256/ /pubmed/37568479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155076 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Parisi, Simona Gambardella, Claudio Conzo, Giovanni Ruggiero, Roberto Tolone, Salvatore Lucido, Francesco Saverio Iovino, Francesco Fisone, Francesca Brusciano, Luigi Parmeggiani, Domenico Docimo, Ludovico Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound |
title | Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound |
title_full | Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound |
title_fullStr | Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound |
title_full_unstemmed | Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound |
title_short | Advanced Localization Technique for Non-Palpable Breast Cancer: Radiofrequency alone VS Combined Technique with Ultrasound |
title_sort | advanced localization technique for non-palpable breast cancer: radiofrequency alone vs combined technique with ultrasound |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10420256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37568479 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155076 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parisisimona advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT gambardellaclaudio advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT conzogiovanni advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT ruggieroroberto advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT tolonesalvatore advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT lucidofrancescosaverio advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT iovinofrancesco advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT fisonefrancesca advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT bruscianoluigi advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT parmeggianidomenico advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound AT docimoludovico advancedlocalizationtechniquefornonpalpablebreastcancerradiofrequencyalonevscombinedtechniquewithultrasound |