Ceramide Risk Score in the Evaluation of Metabolic Syndrome: An Additional or Substitutive Biochemical Marker in the Clinical Practice?

Ceramide risk score (CERT1, ceramide test 1), based on specific ceramides (Cers) and their corresponding ratios in the plasma, has been reported as a promising biochemical marker for primary and secondary prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in different populations of patients. Thus far, limited attention has been paid to metabolic syndrome, a condition considered at high CVD risk. The aim of the present study was to evaluate CERT1 in a group of obese subjects without (OB-MetS−) and with (OB-MetS+) metabolic syndrome (according to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) diagnostic criteria), compared to an age- and sex-matched normal-weight (NW) group. In all participants, plasma levels of Cer 16:0, Cer 18:0, Cer 24:1, and Cer 24:0 were measured, and the corresponding ratios Cer 16:0/24:0, Cer 18:0/24:0, and Cer 24:1/24:0 were calculated together with CERT1. Subjects with obesity showed higher CERT1 values than the NW group (p < 0.05), with no difference between OB-MetS− and OB-MetS+ groups. Waist circumference (WC), homeostatic model assessment of insulin-resistance (HOMA-IR) (surrogates of IDF diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome), and C reactive protein (CRP) (a marker of inflammation) were predictors of CERT1 (p < 0.05), with the contribution of the other IDF criteria such as arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia being negligible. Adjustment for WC resulted in a loss of the difference in CERT1 between OB-MetS− and NW subjects, with the combination of WC and HOMA-IR or CRP as covariates being necessary to yield the same effect for the difference in CERT1 between OB-MetS+ and NW subjects. Importantly, an association was found between CERT1 and vascular age (VA) (p < 0.05). Proportions of NW, OB-MetS− and OB-MetS+ subjects appeared to be distributed according to the CERT1-based risk groups (i.e., low, moderate, increased, and high risk; p < 0.05), with some OB-MetS− subjects included in the increased/high-risk group and some OB-MetS+ in the low/moderate-risk one. In conclusion, the clinical diagnosis of metabolic syndrome seems to be inaccurate to assess CVD risk in the obese population; however, further studies are needed before considering CERT1 as an additional or substitutive biochemical marker in clinical practice.