Cargando…
Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support
The Y509E mutant of β-xylosidase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (XynB2(Y509E)) (which also bears xylanase activity) has been immobilized in chitosan spheres through either entrapment or covalent bond formation methods. The maximum immobilization yield by entrapment was achieved by chitosan bead...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37571063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15153170 |
_version_ | 1785088884266237952 |
---|---|
author | Romero, Gabriela Contreras, Lellys M. Aguirre Céspedes, Carolina Wilkesman, Jeff Clemente-Jiménez, Josefa María Rodríguez-Vico, Felipe Las Heras-Vázquez, Francisco Javier |
author_facet | Romero, Gabriela Contreras, Lellys M. Aguirre Céspedes, Carolina Wilkesman, Jeff Clemente-Jiménez, Josefa María Rodríguez-Vico, Felipe Las Heras-Vázquez, Francisco Javier |
author_sort | Romero, Gabriela |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Y509E mutant of β-xylosidase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (XynB2(Y509E)) (which also bears xylanase activity) has been immobilized in chitosan spheres through either entrapment or covalent bond formation methods. The maximum immobilization yield by entrapment was achieved by chitosan beads developed using a 2% chitosan solution after 1 h of maturation time in CFG buffer with ethanol. On the other hand, the highest value in covalent bond immobilization was observed when employing chitosan beads that were prepared from a 2% chitosan solution after 4 h of activation in 1% glutaraldehyde solution at pH 8. The activity expressed after immobilization by covalent bonding was 23% higher compared to the activity expressed following entrapment immobilization, with values of 122.3 and 99.4 IU.g(−1), respectively. Kinetic data revealed that catalytic turnover values were decreased as compared to a free counterpart. Both biocatalysts showed increased thermal and pH stability, along with an improved storage capacity, as they retained 88% and 40% of their activity after being stored at 4 °C for two months. Moreover, XynB2(Y509E) immobilized by covalent binding also exhibited outstanding reusability, retaining 92% of activity after 10 cycles of reuse. In conclusion, our results suggest that the covalent bond method appears to be the best choice for XynB2(Y509E) immobilization. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10421103 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104211032023-08-12 Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support Romero, Gabriela Contreras, Lellys M. Aguirre Céspedes, Carolina Wilkesman, Jeff Clemente-Jiménez, Josefa María Rodríguez-Vico, Felipe Las Heras-Vázquez, Francisco Javier Polymers (Basel) Article The Y509E mutant of β-xylosidase from Geobacillus stearothermophilus (XynB2(Y509E)) (which also bears xylanase activity) has been immobilized in chitosan spheres through either entrapment or covalent bond formation methods. The maximum immobilization yield by entrapment was achieved by chitosan beads developed using a 2% chitosan solution after 1 h of maturation time in CFG buffer with ethanol. On the other hand, the highest value in covalent bond immobilization was observed when employing chitosan beads that were prepared from a 2% chitosan solution after 4 h of activation in 1% glutaraldehyde solution at pH 8. The activity expressed after immobilization by covalent bonding was 23% higher compared to the activity expressed following entrapment immobilization, with values of 122.3 and 99.4 IU.g(−1), respectively. Kinetic data revealed that catalytic turnover values were decreased as compared to a free counterpart. Both biocatalysts showed increased thermal and pH stability, along with an improved storage capacity, as they retained 88% and 40% of their activity after being stored at 4 °C for two months. Moreover, XynB2(Y509E) immobilized by covalent binding also exhibited outstanding reusability, retaining 92% of activity after 10 cycles of reuse. In conclusion, our results suggest that the covalent bond method appears to be the best choice for XynB2(Y509E) immobilization. MDPI 2023-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10421103/ /pubmed/37571063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15153170 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Romero, Gabriela Contreras, Lellys M. Aguirre Céspedes, Carolina Wilkesman, Jeff Clemente-Jiménez, Josefa María Rodríguez-Vico, Felipe Las Heras-Vázquez, Francisco Javier Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support |
title | Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support |
title_full | Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support |
title_fullStr | Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support |
title_short | Efficiency Assessment between Entrapment and Covalent Bond Immobilization of Mutant β-Xylosidase onto Chitosan Support |
title_sort | efficiency assessment between entrapment and covalent bond immobilization of mutant β-xylosidase onto chitosan support |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421103/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37571063 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15153170 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT romerogabriela efficiencyassessmentbetweenentrapmentandcovalentbondimmobilizationofmutantbxylosidaseontochitosansupport AT contreraslellysm efficiencyassessmentbetweenentrapmentandcovalentbondimmobilizationofmutantbxylosidaseontochitosansupport AT aguirrecespedescarolina efficiencyassessmentbetweenentrapmentandcovalentbondimmobilizationofmutantbxylosidaseontochitosansupport AT wilkesmanjeff efficiencyassessmentbetweenentrapmentandcovalentbondimmobilizationofmutantbxylosidaseontochitosansupport AT clementejimenezjosefamaria efficiencyassessmentbetweenentrapmentandcovalentbondimmobilizationofmutantbxylosidaseontochitosansupport AT rodriguezvicofelipe efficiencyassessmentbetweenentrapmentandcovalentbondimmobilizationofmutantbxylosidaseontochitosansupport AT lasherasvazquezfranciscojavier efficiencyassessmentbetweenentrapmentandcovalentbondimmobilizationofmutantbxylosidaseontochitosansupport |