Cargando…

Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA

The combined approach of classical fingerprinting and DNA profiling is a powerful tool in forensic investigations of latent “touch” traces. However, little attention has been paid to the organic solvents frequently used in dactyloscopic laboratories to facilitate the separation of adhesive evidence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gausterer, Christian, Birnbaumer, Gerald, Ondrovics, Wolfgang, Stein, Christina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37402011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w
_version_ 1785089047045079040
author Gausterer, Christian
Birnbaumer, Gerald
Ondrovics, Wolfgang
Stein, Christina
author_facet Gausterer, Christian
Birnbaumer, Gerald
Ondrovics, Wolfgang
Stein, Christina
author_sort Gausterer, Christian
collection PubMed
description The combined approach of classical fingerprinting and DNA profiling is a powerful tool in forensic investigations of latent “touch” traces. However, little attention has been paid to the organic solvents frequently used in dactyloscopic laboratories to facilitate the separation of adhesive evidence prior to fingerprint development and downstream effects on subsequent DNA profiling. In the present study, we tested a selection of adhesive removers (n = 9) and assessed their potential impact on DNA recovery and amplification by PCR. Thereby, we identified and characterized novel PCR inhibitors. All investigated chemicals contain volatile organic compounds that evaporate under normal indoor atmospheric conditions. Exposure to certain solvents resulted in increased DNA degradation, but only if evaporation was prevented. A series of adhesive-removal experiments were conducted with prepared mock evidence (self-adhesive postage stamps affixed to paper envelope) to investigate the impact of treatment time and the location of applied traces on DNA recovery and dactyloscopy, respectively. Due to the early onset of print decomposition, we found that only a short treatment time was compatible with the development of fingerprints on the adhesive side of a stamp. Solvents also removed DNA from the adhesive surface, thus resulting in a marked shift in the substrate distribution of recovered DNA from the stamp to the envelope, but not in the reverse direction. Furthermore, we observed that treatment with conventional fingerprint reagents lead to a significant reduction in the amounts of DNA recovered from stamps, while the additional use of adhesive removers did not significantly enhance this effect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10421768
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104217682023-08-13 Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA Gausterer, Christian Birnbaumer, Gerald Ondrovics, Wolfgang Stein, Christina Int J Legal Med Original Article The combined approach of classical fingerprinting and DNA profiling is a powerful tool in forensic investigations of latent “touch” traces. However, little attention has been paid to the organic solvents frequently used in dactyloscopic laboratories to facilitate the separation of adhesive evidence prior to fingerprint development and downstream effects on subsequent DNA profiling. In the present study, we tested a selection of adhesive removers (n = 9) and assessed their potential impact on DNA recovery and amplification by PCR. Thereby, we identified and characterized novel PCR inhibitors. All investigated chemicals contain volatile organic compounds that evaporate under normal indoor atmospheric conditions. Exposure to certain solvents resulted in increased DNA degradation, but only if evaporation was prevented. A series of adhesive-removal experiments were conducted with prepared mock evidence (self-adhesive postage stamps affixed to paper envelope) to investigate the impact of treatment time and the location of applied traces on DNA recovery and dactyloscopy, respectively. Due to the early onset of print decomposition, we found that only a short treatment time was compatible with the development of fingerprints on the adhesive side of a stamp. Solvents also removed DNA from the adhesive surface, thus resulting in a marked shift in the substrate distribution of recovered DNA from the stamp to the envelope, but not in the reverse direction. Furthermore, we observed that treatment with conventional fingerprint reagents lead to a significant reduction in the amounts of DNA recovered from stamps, while the additional use of adhesive removers did not significantly enhance this effect. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-04 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10421768/ /pubmed/37402011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Gausterer, Christian
Birnbaumer, Gerald
Ondrovics, Wolfgang
Stein, Christina
Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA
title Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA
title_full Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA
title_fullStr Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA
title_full_unstemmed Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA
title_short Effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and DNA
title_sort effects of solvent-based adhesive removal on the subsequent dual analysis of fingerprint and dna
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10421768/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37402011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-023-03042-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gaustererchristian effectsofsolventbasedadhesiveremovalonthesubsequentdualanalysisoffingerprintanddna
AT birnbaumergerald effectsofsolventbasedadhesiveremovalonthesubsequentdualanalysisoffingerprintanddna
AT ondrovicswolfgang effectsofsolventbasedadhesiveremovalonthesubsequentdualanalysisoffingerprintanddna
AT steinchristina effectsofsolventbasedadhesiveremovalonthesubsequentdualanalysisoffingerprintanddna