Cargando…

Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS

In this work, the complex refractive indexes of seven PEDOT:PSS samples, three with isotropic behavior and four with optical anisotropy, were determined. For the anisotropic samples, the ordinary and extraordinary components of the refractive index were described. The effect of the film thickness, m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velasco Davoise, Lara, Peña Capilla, Rafael, Díez-Pascual, Ana M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37571192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15153298
_version_ 1785089144925454336
author Velasco Davoise, Lara
Peña Capilla, Rafael
Díez-Pascual, Ana M.
author_facet Velasco Davoise, Lara
Peña Capilla, Rafael
Díez-Pascual, Ana M.
author_sort Velasco Davoise, Lara
collection PubMed
description In this work, the complex refractive indexes of seven PEDOT:PSS samples, three with isotropic behavior and four with optical anisotropy, were determined. For the anisotropic samples, the ordinary and extraordinary components of the refractive index were described. The effect of the film thickness, measurement technique and preparation method on the extinction coefficient (k) and refractive index (n) of each sample was also discussed. Important differences (up to 20% in the average n) were found among the samples investigated. In most anisotropic films, the mean value of the extraordinary component was between 7 and 10% higher than that of the ordinary. In the three isotropic films, the average k rose when the film thickness increased. Moreover, the different sets of refractive index data were fitted to three different models: the original Forouhi–Bloomer model, the Liu (2007) model and the revised version of the Forouhi–Bloomer model (2019). In general, Liu’s model gave better results, with small errors in n and k (<7.81 and 4.68%, respectively, in all the cases). However, this model had seven fitting parameters, which led to significantly longer computation time than the other two models. The influence of the differences in the measurement of the complex refractive index on the simulation of the optical properties of PEDOT:PSS multilayers was discussed. The results showed that n must be known precisely to accurately calculate the light absorption in a multilayer, without ignoring the isotropic or anisotropic behavior of the material or the influence of the layer thickness on its optical properties. This study aids in the development of simulation and optimization tools that allow understanding the optical properties of PEDOT:PSS films for their potential applications in organic optoelectronic devices, such as organic solar cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10422196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104221962023-08-13 Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS Velasco Davoise, Lara Peña Capilla, Rafael Díez-Pascual, Ana M. Polymers (Basel) Article In this work, the complex refractive indexes of seven PEDOT:PSS samples, three with isotropic behavior and four with optical anisotropy, were determined. For the anisotropic samples, the ordinary and extraordinary components of the refractive index were described. The effect of the film thickness, measurement technique and preparation method on the extinction coefficient (k) and refractive index (n) of each sample was also discussed. Important differences (up to 20% in the average n) were found among the samples investigated. In most anisotropic films, the mean value of the extraordinary component was between 7 and 10% higher than that of the ordinary. In the three isotropic films, the average k rose when the film thickness increased. Moreover, the different sets of refractive index data were fitted to three different models: the original Forouhi–Bloomer model, the Liu (2007) model and the revised version of the Forouhi–Bloomer model (2019). In general, Liu’s model gave better results, with small errors in n and k (<7.81 and 4.68%, respectively, in all the cases). However, this model had seven fitting parameters, which led to significantly longer computation time than the other two models. The influence of the differences in the measurement of the complex refractive index on the simulation of the optical properties of PEDOT:PSS multilayers was discussed. The results showed that n must be known precisely to accurately calculate the light absorption in a multilayer, without ignoring the isotropic or anisotropic behavior of the material or the influence of the layer thickness on its optical properties. This study aids in the development of simulation and optimization tools that allow understanding the optical properties of PEDOT:PSS films for their potential applications in organic optoelectronic devices, such as organic solar cells. MDPI 2023-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC10422196/ /pubmed/37571192 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15153298 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Velasco Davoise, Lara
Peña Capilla, Rafael
Díez-Pascual, Ana M.
Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS
title Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS
title_full Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS
title_fullStr Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS
title_full_unstemmed Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS
title_short Isotropic and Anisotropic Complex Refractive Index of PEDOT:PSS
title_sort isotropic and anisotropic complex refractive index of pedot:pss
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37571192
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15153298
work_keys_str_mv AT velascodavoiselara isotropicandanisotropiccomplexrefractiveindexofpedotpss
AT penacapillarafael isotropicandanisotropiccomplexrefractiveindexofpedotpss
AT diezpascualanam isotropicandanisotropiccomplexrefractiveindexofpedotpss