Cargando…
Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review
In the pursuit of optimizing the efficiency, flexibility, and adaptability of agricultural practices, human–robot interaction (HRI) has emerged in agriculture. Enabled by the ongoing advancement in information and communication technologies, this approach aspires to overcome the challenges originati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37571559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23156776 |
_version_ | 1785089196642271232 |
---|---|
author | Benos, Lefteris Moysiadis, Vasileios Kateris, Dimitrios Tagarakis, Aristotelis C. Busato, Patrizia Pearson, Simon Bochtis, Dionysis |
author_facet | Benos, Lefteris Moysiadis, Vasileios Kateris, Dimitrios Tagarakis, Aristotelis C. Busato, Patrizia Pearson, Simon Bochtis, Dionysis |
author_sort | Benos, Lefteris |
collection | PubMed |
description | In the pursuit of optimizing the efficiency, flexibility, and adaptability of agricultural practices, human–robot interaction (HRI) has emerged in agriculture. Enabled by the ongoing advancement in information and communication technologies, this approach aspires to overcome the challenges originating from the inherent complex agricultural environments. Τhis paper systematically reviews the scholarly literature to capture the current progress and trends in this promising field as well as identify future research directions. It can be inferred that there is a growing interest in this field, which relies on combining perspectives from several disciplines to obtain a holistic understanding. The subject of the selected papers is mainly synergistic target detection, while simulation was the main methodology. Furthermore, melons, grapes, and strawberries were the crops with the highest interest for HRI applications. Finally, collaboration and cooperation were the most preferred interaction modes, with various levels of automation being examined. On all occasions, the synergy of humans and robots demonstrated the best results in terms of system performance, physical workload of workers, and time needed to execute the performed tasks. However, despite the associated progress, there is still a long way to go towards establishing viable, functional, and safe human–robot interactive systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10422385 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104223852023-08-13 Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review Benos, Lefteris Moysiadis, Vasileios Kateris, Dimitrios Tagarakis, Aristotelis C. Busato, Patrizia Pearson, Simon Bochtis, Dionysis Sensors (Basel) Review In the pursuit of optimizing the efficiency, flexibility, and adaptability of agricultural practices, human–robot interaction (HRI) has emerged in agriculture. Enabled by the ongoing advancement in information and communication technologies, this approach aspires to overcome the challenges originating from the inherent complex agricultural environments. Τhis paper systematically reviews the scholarly literature to capture the current progress and trends in this promising field as well as identify future research directions. It can be inferred that there is a growing interest in this field, which relies on combining perspectives from several disciplines to obtain a holistic understanding. The subject of the selected papers is mainly synergistic target detection, while simulation was the main methodology. Furthermore, melons, grapes, and strawberries were the crops with the highest interest for HRI applications. Finally, collaboration and cooperation were the most preferred interaction modes, with various levels of automation being examined. On all occasions, the synergy of humans and robots demonstrated the best results in terms of system performance, physical workload of workers, and time needed to execute the performed tasks. However, despite the associated progress, there is still a long way to go towards establishing viable, functional, and safe human–robot interactive systems. MDPI 2023-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10422385/ /pubmed/37571559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23156776 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Benos, Lefteris Moysiadis, Vasileios Kateris, Dimitrios Tagarakis, Aristotelis C. Busato, Patrizia Pearson, Simon Bochtis, Dionysis Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review |
title | Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Human–Robot Interaction in Agriculture: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | human–robot interaction in agriculture: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10422385/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37571559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23156776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benoslefteris humanrobotinteractioninagricultureasystematicreview AT moysiadisvasileios humanrobotinteractioninagricultureasystematicreview AT katerisdimitrios humanrobotinteractioninagricultureasystematicreview AT tagarakisaristotelisc humanrobotinteractioninagricultureasystematicreview AT busatopatrizia humanrobotinteractioninagricultureasystematicreview AT pearsonsimon humanrobotinteractioninagricultureasystematicreview AT bochtisdionysis humanrobotinteractioninagricultureasystematicreview |