Cargando…

Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations

BACKGROUND: microMend, a novel microstaple skin closure device, may be able to close simple lacerations. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using microMend to close these wounds in the ED. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm clinical study conducted at two EDs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nizami, Tarek, Beaudoin, Francesca, Suner, Selim, Aluisio, Adam, Bhatt, Reena A, Jay, Gregory D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37220958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212667
_version_ 1785089459127058432
author Nizami, Tarek
Beaudoin, Francesca
Suner, Selim
Aluisio, Adam
Bhatt, Reena A
Jay, Gregory D
author_facet Nizami, Tarek
Beaudoin, Francesca
Suner, Selim
Aluisio, Adam
Bhatt, Reena A
Jay, Gregory D
author_sort Nizami, Tarek
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: microMend, a novel microstaple skin closure device, may be able to close simple lacerations. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using microMend to close these wounds in the ED. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm clinical study conducted at two EDs within a large urban academic medical centre. Wounds closed with microMend underwent assessments performed at days 0, 7, 30 and 90. Photographs of treated wounds were rated by two plastic surgeons using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and a wound evaluation scale (WES), which has a best possible score of 6. Participants rated pain during application and both participants and providers rated their satisfaction with the device. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants were enrolled in the study: 48% were female and the mean age of participants was 45.6 (95% CI 39.1 to 52.1). The mean wound length was 2.35 cm (95% CI 1.77 to 2.92), with a range of 1–10 cm. Mean VAS and WES scores at day 90 as evaluated by two plastic surgeons were 84.1 mm (95% CI 80.2 to 87.9) and 4.91 (95% CI 4.54 to 5.29), respectively. The mean pain score with application of the devices was 7.28 mm (95% CI 2.88 to 11.68) on a scale of 0–100 mm using VAS. Local anaesthesia was used in 9 patients (29%, 95% CI 20.7 to 37.3) of participants (of whom 5 required deep sutures). Ninety per cent (90%) of participants rated their overall assessment of the device as excellent (74%) or good (16%) at day 90. There were no serious adverse events in any participants in the study. CONCLUSION: microMend appears to be an acceptable alternative for closing skin lacerations in the ED, providing good cosmetic results, with high levels of satisfaction by patients and providers. Randomised trials are needed to compare microMend with other wound closure products. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03830515.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10423470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104234702023-08-14 Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations Nizami, Tarek Beaudoin, Francesca Suner, Selim Aluisio, Adam Bhatt, Reena A Jay, Gregory D Emerg Med J Original Research BACKGROUND: microMend, a novel microstaple skin closure device, may be able to close simple lacerations. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of using microMend to close these wounds in the ED. METHODS: This was an open-label, single-arm clinical study conducted at two EDs within a large urban academic medical centre. Wounds closed with microMend underwent assessments performed at days 0, 7, 30 and 90. Photographs of treated wounds were rated by two plastic surgeons using a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and a wound evaluation scale (WES), which has a best possible score of 6. Participants rated pain during application and both participants and providers rated their satisfaction with the device. RESULTS: Thirty-one participants were enrolled in the study: 48% were female and the mean age of participants was 45.6 (95% CI 39.1 to 52.1). The mean wound length was 2.35 cm (95% CI 1.77 to 2.92), with a range of 1–10 cm. Mean VAS and WES scores at day 90 as evaluated by two plastic surgeons were 84.1 mm (95% CI 80.2 to 87.9) and 4.91 (95% CI 4.54 to 5.29), respectively. The mean pain score with application of the devices was 7.28 mm (95% CI 2.88 to 11.68) on a scale of 0–100 mm using VAS. Local anaesthesia was used in 9 patients (29%, 95% CI 20.7 to 37.3) of participants (of whom 5 required deep sutures). Ninety per cent (90%) of participants rated their overall assessment of the device as excellent (74%) or good (16%) at day 90. There were no serious adverse events in any participants in the study. CONCLUSION: microMend appears to be an acceptable alternative for closing skin lacerations in the ED, providing good cosmetic results, with high levels of satisfaction by patients and providers. Randomised trials are needed to compare microMend with other wound closure products. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03830515. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08 2023-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10423470/ /pubmed/37220958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212667 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Nizami, Tarek
Beaudoin, Francesca
Suner, Selim
Aluisio, Adam
Bhatt, Reena A
Jay, Gregory D
Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations
title Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations
title_full Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations
title_fullStr Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations
title_short Evaluation of microMend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations
title_sort evaluation of micromend wound closure device in repairing skin lacerations
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37220958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212667
work_keys_str_mv AT nizamitarek evaluationofmicromendwoundclosuredeviceinrepairingskinlacerations
AT beaudoinfrancesca evaluationofmicromendwoundclosuredeviceinrepairingskinlacerations
AT sunerselim evaluationofmicromendwoundclosuredeviceinrepairingskinlacerations
AT aluisioadam evaluationofmicromendwoundclosuredeviceinrepairingskinlacerations
AT bhattreenaa evaluationofmicromendwoundclosuredeviceinrepairingskinlacerations
AT jaygregoryd evaluationofmicromendwoundclosuredeviceinrepairingskinlacerations