Cargando…
Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England
BACKGROUND: The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England is a behavioural intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). How this programme affects inequalities by age, sex, limiting illnesses or disability, ethnicity or dep...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219654 |
_version_ | 1785089472869695488 |
---|---|
author | Chatzi, Georgia Whittaker, William Chandola, Tarani Mason, Thomas Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Sutton, Matt Bower, Peter |
author_facet | Chatzi, Georgia Whittaker, William Chandola, Tarani Mason, Thomas Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Sutton, Matt Bower, Peter |
author_sort | Chatzi, Georgia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England is a behavioural intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). How this programme affects inequalities by age, sex, limiting illnesses or disability, ethnicity or deprivation is not known. METHODS: We used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to compare whether the population with NDH at different stages of the programme are representative of the population with NDH: stages include (1) prevalence of NDH (using survey data from UK Household Longitudinal Study (n=794) and Health Survey for England (n=1383)); (2) identification in primary care and offer of programme (using administrative data from the National Diabetes Audit (n=1 267 350)) and (3) programme participation (using programme provider records (n=98 024)). RESULTS: Predicted probabilities drawn from the regressions with demographics as each outcome and dataset identifier as predictors showed that younger adults (aged under 40) (4% of the population with NDH (95% CI 2.4% to 6.5%)) and older adults (aged 80 and above) (12% (95% CI 9.5% to 14.2%)) were slightly under-represented among programme participants (2% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.2%) and 8% (95% CI 7.8% to 8.2%) of programme participants, respectively). People living in deprived areas were under-represented in eight sessions (14% (95% CI 13.7% to 14.4%) vs 20% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.6%) in the general population). Ethnic minorities were over-represented among offers (35% (95% CI 35.1% to 35.6%) vs 13% (95% CI 9.1% to 16.4%) in general population), though the proportion dropped at the programme completion stage (19% (95% CI 18.5% to 19.5%)). CONCLUSION: The DPP has the potential to reduce ethnic inequalities, but may widen socioeconomic, age and limiting illness or disability-related inequalities in T2DM. While ethnic minority groups are over-represented at the identification and offer stages, efforts are required to support completion of the programme. Programme providers should target under-represented groups to ensure equitable access and narrow inequalities in T2DM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10423529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104235292023-08-14 Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England Chatzi, Georgia Whittaker, William Chandola, Tarani Mason, Thomas Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Sutton, Matt Bower, Peter J Epidemiol Community Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (DPP) in England is a behavioural intervention for preventing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) among people with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH). How this programme affects inequalities by age, sex, limiting illnesses or disability, ethnicity or deprivation is not known. METHODS: We used multinomial and binary logistic regression models to compare whether the population with NDH at different stages of the programme are representative of the population with NDH: stages include (1) prevalence of NDH (using survey data from UK Household Longitudinal Study (n=794) and Health Survey for England (n=1383)); (2) identification in primary care and offer of programme (using administrative data from the National Diabetes Audit (n=1 267 350)) and (3) programme participation (using programme provider records (n=98 024)). RESULTS: Predicted probabilities drawn from the regressions with demographics as each outcome and dataset identifier as predictors showed that younger adults (aged under 40) (4% of the population with NDH (95% CI 2.4% to 6.5%)) and older adults (aged 80 and above) (12% (95% CI 9.5% to 14.2%)) were slightly under-represented among programme participants (2% (95% CI 1.8% to 2.2%) and 8% (95% CI 7.8% to 8.2%) of programme participants, respectively). People living in deprived areas were under-represented in eight sessions (14% (95% CI 13.7% to 14.4%) vs 20% (95% CI 16.4% to 23.6%) in the general population). Ethnic minorities were over-represented among offers (35% (95% CI 35.1% to 35.6%) vs 13% (95% CI 9.1% to 16.4%) in general population), though the proportion dropped at the programme completion stage (19% (95% CI 18.5% to 19.5%)). CONCLUSION: The DPP has the potential to reduce ethnic inequalities, but may widen socioeconomic, age and limiting illness or disability-related inequalities in T2DM. While ethnic minority groups are over-represented at the identification and offer stages, efforts are required to support completion of the programme. Programme providers should target under-represented groups to ensure equitable access and narrow inequalities in T2DM. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-09 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10423529/ /pubmed/37353312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219654 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chatzi, Georgia Whittaker, William Chandola, Tarani Mason, Thomas Soiland-Reyes, Claudia Sutton, Matt Bower, Peter Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England |
title | Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England |
title_full | Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England |
title_fullStr | Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England |
title_full_unstemmed | Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England |
title_short | Could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? Comparison of survey and administrative data for England |
title_sort | could diabetes prevention programmes result in the widening of sociodemographic inequalities in type 2 diabetes? comparison of survey and administrative data for england |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-219654 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chatzigeorgia coulddiabetespreventionprogrammesresultinthewideningofsociodemographicinequalitiesintype2diabetescomparisonofsurveyandadministrativedataforengland AT whittakerwilliam coulddiabetespreventionprogrammesresultinthewideningofsociodemographicinequalitiesintype2diabetescomparisonofsurveyandadministrativedataforengland AT chandolatarani coulddiabetespreventionprogrammesresultinthewideningofsociodemographicinequalitiesintype2diabetescomparisonofsurveyandadministrativedataforengland AT masonthomas coulddiabetespreventionprogrammesresultinthewideningofsociodemographicinequalitiesintype2diabetescomparisonofsurveyandadministrativedataforengland AT soilandreyesclaudia coulddiabetespreventionprogrammesresultinthewideningofsociodemographicinequalitiesintype2diabetescomparisonofsurveyandadministrativedataforengland AT suttonmatt coulddiabetespreventionprogrammesresultinthewideningofsociodemographicinequalitiesintype2diabetescomparisonofsurveyandadministrativedataforengland AT bowerpeter coulddiabetespreventionprogrammesresultinthewideningofsociodemographicinequalitiesintype2diabetescomparisonofsurveyandadministrativedataforengland |