Cargando…

Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the adherence to strategies to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynae-oncology patients. Patient-reported nausea before and after ERAS was also studied. METHODS: This pros...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lindemann, Kristina, Heimisdottir Danbolt, Svana, Ramberg, Lene, Eyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur, Wang, Yun Yong, Heli-Haugestøl, Anne Gjertine, Walcott, Sara L, Mjåland, Odd, Navestad, Gerd Anita, Hermanrud, Silje, Juul-Hansen, Knut Erling, Bragstad, Line K, Opheim, Randi, Kleppe, Andreas, Kongsgaard, Ulf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37451689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004356
_version_ 1785089475387326464
author Lindemann, Kristina
Heimisdottir Danbolt, Svana
Ramberg, Lene
Eyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur
Wang, Yun Yong
Heli-Haugestøl, Anne Gjertine
Walcott, Sara L
Mjåland, Odd
Navestad, Gerd Anita
Hermanrud, Silje
Juul-Hansen, Knut Erling
Bragstad, Line K
Opheim, Randi
Kleppe, Andreas
Kongsgaard, Ulf
author_facet Lindemann, Kristina
Heimisdottir Danbolt, Svana
Ramberg, Lene
Eyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur
Wang, Yun Yong
Heli-Haugestøl, Anne Gjertine
Walcott, Sara L
Mjåland, Odd
Navestad, Gerd Anita
Hermanrud, Silje
Juul-Hansen, Knut Erling
Bragstad, Line K
Opheim, Randi
Kleppe, Andreas
Kongsgaard, Ulf
author_sort Lindemann, Kristina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the adherence to strategies to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynae-oncology patients. Patient-reported nausea before and after ERAS was also studied. METHODS: This prospective observational study included all patients undergoing laparotomy for a suspicious pelvic mass or confirmed advanced ovarian cancer before (pre-ERAS) and after the implementation of ERAS (post-ERAS) at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Patients were a priori stratified according to the planned extent of surgery into two cohorts (Cohort 1: Surgery of advanced disease; Cohort 2: Surgery for a suspicious pelvic tumor). Clinical data including baseline characteristics and outcome data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: A total of 439 patients were included, 243 pre-ERAS and 196 post-ERAS. At baseline, 27% of the patients reported any grade of nausea. In the post-ERAS cohort, statistically significantly more patients received double post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis (64% pre-ERAS vs 84% post-ERAS, p<0.0001). There was no difference in the need for rescue medication (82% pre-ERAS vs 79% post-ERAS; p=0.17) and no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-ERAS or between the surgical cohorts in patient-reported nausea of any grade on day 2. Patients who reported none/mild nausea on day 2 had significantly less peri-operative fluid administered during surgery than those who reported moderate or severe nausea (median 12.5 mL/kg/hour vs 16.5 mL/kg/hour, p=0.045) but, in multivariable analysis, fluid management did not remain significantly associated with nausea. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ERAS protocol increased the adherence to post-operative nausea and vomiting prevention guidelines. Nausea, both before and after laparotomy, remains an unmet clinical need of gynae-oncology patients also in an ERAS program. Patient-reported outcome measures warrant further investigation in the evaluation of ERAS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10423539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104235392023-08-14 Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients Lindemann, Kristina Heimisdottir Danbolt, Svana Ramberg, Lene Eyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur Wang, Yun Yong Heli-Haugestøl, Anne Gjertine Walcott, Sara L Mjåland, Odd Navestad, Gerd Anita Hermanrud, Silje Juul-Hansen, Knut Erling Bragstad, Line K Opheim, Randi Kleppe, Andreas Kongsgaard, Ulf Int J Gynecol Cancer Original Research OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to analyze the adherence to strategies to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynae-oncology patients. Patient-reported nausea before and after ERAS was also studied. METHODS: This prospective observational study included all patients undergoing laparotomy for a suspicious pelvic mass or confirmed advanced ovarian cancer before (pre-ERAS) and after the implementation of ERAS (post-ERAS) at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Patients were a priori stratified according to the planned extent of surgery into two cohorts (Cohort 1: Surgery of advanced disease; Cohort 2: Surgery for a suspicious pelvic tumor). Clinical data including baseline characteristics and outcome data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: A total of 439 patients were included, 243 pre-ERAS and 196 post-ERAS. At baseline, 27% of the patients reported any grade of nausea. In the post-ERAS cohort, statistically significantly more patients received double post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis (64% pre-ERAS vs 84% post-ERAS, p<0.0001). There was no difference in the need for rescue medication (82% pre-ERAS vs 79% post-ERAS; p=0.17) and no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-ERAS or between the surgical cohorts in patient-reported nausea of any grade on day 2. Patients who reported none/mild nausea on day 2 had significantly less peri-operative fluid administered during surgery than those who reported moderate or severe nausea (median 12.5 mL/kg/hour vs 16.5 mL/kg/hour, p=0.045) but, in multivariable analysis, fluid management did not remain significantly associated with nausea. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an ERAS protocol increased the adherence to post-operative nausea and vomiting prevention guidelines. Nausea, both before and after laparotomy, remains an unmet clinical need of gynae-oncology patients also in an ERAS program. Patient-reported outcome measures warrant further investigation in the evaluation of ERAS. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08 2023-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10423539/ /pubmed/37451689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004356 Text en © IGCS and ESGO 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, an indication of whether changes were made, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Lindemann, Kristina
Heimisdottir Danbolt, Svana
Ramberg, Lene
Eyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur
Wang, Yun Yong
Heli-Haugestøl, Anne Gjertine
Walcott, Sara L
Mjåland, Odd
Navestad, Gerd Anita
Hermanrud, Silje
Juul-Hansen, Knut Erling
Bragstad, Line K
Opheim, Randi
Kleppe, Andreas
Kongsgaard, Ulf
Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
title Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
title_full Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
title_fullStr Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
title_short Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
title_sort patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37451689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004356
work_keys_str_mv AT lindemannkristina patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT heimisdottirdanboltsvana patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT ramberglene patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT eyjolfsdottirbrynhildur patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT wangyunyong patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT helihaugestølannegjertine patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT walcottsaral patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT mjalandodd patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT navestadgerdanita patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT hermanrudsilje patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT juulhansenknuterling patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT bragstadlinek patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT opheimrandi patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT kleppeandreas patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients
AT kongsgaardulf patientreportednauseaafterimplementationofanenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryprotocolforgynaeoncologypatients