Cargando…
Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to utilize machine learning techniques to analyze perioperative factors and identify blood glucose levels that can predict the occurrence of surgical site infection following posterior lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 4019 patients receiving lumba...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37581167 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S417431 |
_version_ | 1785089489921638400 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Tianyou Liu, Chong Zhang, Zide Liang, Tuo Zhu, Jichong Zhou, Chenxing Wu, Shaofeng Yao, Yuanlin Huang, Chengqian Zhang, Bin Feng, Sitan Wang, Zequn Huang, Shengsheng Sun, Xuhua Chen, Liyi Zhan, Xinli |
author_facet | Chen, Tianyou Liu, Chong Zhang, Zide Liang, Tuo Zhu, Jichong Zhou, Chenxing Wu, Shaofeng Yao, Yuanlin Huang, Chengqian Zhang, Bin Feng, Sitan Wang, Zequn Huang, Shengsheng Sun, Xuhua Chen, Liyi Zhan, Xinli |
author_sort | Chen, Tianyou |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to utilize machine learning techniques to analyze perioperative factors and identify blood glucose levels that can predict the occurrence of surgical site infection following posterior lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 4019 patients receiving lumbar internal fixation surgery from an institute were enrolled between June 2012 and February 2021. First, the filtered data were randomized into the test and verification groups. Second, in the test group, specific variables were screened using logistic regression analysis, Lasso regression analysis, support vector machine, and random forest. Specific variables obtained using the four methods were intersected, and a dynamic model was constructed. ROC and calibration curves were constructed to assess model performance. Finally, internal model performance was verified in the verification group using ROC and calibration curves. RESULTS: The data from 4019 patients were collected. In total, 1327 eligible cases were selected. By combining logistic regression analysis with three machine learning algorithms, this study identified four predictors associated with SSI, namely Modic changes, sebum thickness, hemoglobin, and glucose. Using this information, a prediction model was developed and visually represented. Then, we constructed ROC and calibration curves using the test group; the area under the ROC curve was 0.988. Further, calibration curve analysis revealed favorable consistency of nomogram-predicted values compared with real measurements. The C-index of our model was 0.986 (95% CI 0.981–0.994). Finally, we used the validation group to validate the model internally; the AUC was 0.987. Calibration curve analysis revealed favorable consistency of nomogram-predicted values compared with real measurements. The C-index was 0.982 (95% CI 0.974–0.999). CONCLUSION: Logistic regression analysis and machine learning were employed to select four risk factors: Modic changes, sebum thickness, hemoglobin, and glucose. Then, a dynamic prediction model was constructed to help clinicians simplify the monitoring and prevention of SSI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10423613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104236132023-08-14 Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery Chen, Tianyou Liu, Chong Zhang, Zide Liang, Tuo Zhu, Jichong Zhou, Chenxing Wu, Shaofeng Yao, Yuanlin Huang, Chengqian Zhang, Bin Feng, Sitan Wang, Zequn Huang, Shengsheng Sun, Xuhua Chen, Liyi Zhan, Xinli Infect Drug Resist Original Research OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to utilize machine learning techniques to analyze perioperative factors and identify blood glucose levels that can predict the occurrence of surgical site infection following posterior lumbar spinal surgery. METHODS: A total of 4019 patients receiving lumbar internal fixation surgery from an institute were enrolled between June 2012 and February 2021. First, the filtered data were randomized into the test and verification groups. Second, in the test group, specific variables were screened using logistic regression analysis, Lasso regression analysis, support vector machine, and random forest. Specific variables obtained using the four methods were intersected, and a dynamic model was constructed. ROC and calibration curves were constructed to assess model performance. Finally, internal model performance was verified in the verification group using ROC and calibration curves. RESULTS: The data from 4019 patients were collected. In total, 1327 eligible cases were selected. By combining logistic regression analysis with three machine learning algorithms, this study identified four predictors associated with SSI, namely Modic changes, sebum thickness, hemoglobin, and glucose. Using this information, a prediction model was developed and visually represented. Then, we constructed ROC and calibration curves using the test group; the area under the ROC curve was 0.988. Further, calibration curve analysis revealed favorable consistency of nomogram-predicted values compared with real measurements. The C-index of our model was 0.986 (95% CI 0.981–0.994). Finally, we used the validation group to validate the model internally; the AUC was 0.987. Calibration curve analysis revealed favorable consistency of nomogram-predicted values compared with real measurements. The C-index was 0.982 (95% CI 0.974–0.999). CONCLUSION: Logistic regression analysis and machine learning were employed to select four risk factors: Modic changes, sebum thickness, hemoglobin, and glucose. Then, a dynamic prediction model was constructed to help clinicians simplify the monitoring and prevention of SSI. Dove 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10423613/ /pubmed/37581167 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S417431 Text en © 2023 Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Chen, Tianyou Liu, Chong Zhang, Zide Liang, Tuo Zhu, Jichong Zhou, Chenxing Wu, Shaofeng Yao, Yuanlin Huang, Chengqian Zhang, Bin Feng, Sitan Wang, Zequn Huang, Shengsheng Sun, Xuhua Chen, Liyi Zhan, Xinli Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery |
title | Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery |
title_full | Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery |
title_fullStr | Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery |
title_short | Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery |
title_sort | using machine learning to predict surgical site infection after lumbar spine surgery |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37581167 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S417431 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chentianyou usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT liuchong usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT zhangzide usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT liangtuo usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT zhujichong usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT zhouchenxing usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT wushaofeng usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT yaoyuanlin usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT huangchengqian usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT zhangbin usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT fengsitan usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT wangzequn usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT huangshengsheng usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT sunxuhua usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT chenliyi usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery AT zhanxinli usingmachinelearningtopredictsurgicalsiteinfectionafterlumbarspinesurgery |