Cargando…

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES: Complete en‐bloc resection of pedunculated colorectal carcinoma is necessary for a proper pathological diagnosis. However, due to poor visibility, large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas are difficult to snare and resect en‐bloc using endoscopic resection or polypectomy. Additionally, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inagaki, Katsuaki, Yamashita, Ken, Oka, Shiro, Tanino, Fumiaki, Yamamoto, Noriko, Kamigaichi, Yuki, Tamari, Hirosato, Nishimura, Tomoyuki, Okamoto, Yuki, Tanaka, Hidenori, Kotachi, Takahiro, Yuge, Ryo, Urabe, Yuji, Kitadai, Yasuhiko, Tanaka, Shinji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.277
_version_ 1785089541010358272
author Inagaki, Katsuaki
Yamashita, Ken
Oka, Shiro
Tanino, Fumiaki
Yamamoto, Noriko
Kamigaichi, Yuki
Tamari, Hirosato
Nishimura, Tomoyuki
Okamoto, Yuki
Tanaka, Hidenori
Kotachi, Takahiro
Yuge, Ryo
Urabe, Yuji
Kitadai, Yasuhiko
Tanaka, Shinji
author_facet Inagaki, Katsuaki
Yamashita, Ken
Oka, Shiro
Tanino, Fumiaki
Yamamoto, Noriko
Kamigaichi, Yuki
Tamari, Hirosato
Nishimura, Tomoyuki
Okamoto, Yuki
Tanaka, Hidenori
Kotachi, Takahiro
Yuge, Ryo
Urabe, Yuji
Kitadai, Yasuhiko
Tanaka, Shinji
author_sort Inagaki, Katsuaki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Complete en‐bloc resection of pedunculated colorectal carcinoma is necessary for a proper pathological diagnosis. However, due to poor visibility, large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas are difficult to snare and resect en‐bloc using endoscopic resection or polypectomy. Additionally, the bleeding risk of large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas is relatively high. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study to assess 36 consecutive patients with 36 large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection and evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Furthermore, patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure time, and the factors related to the procedure time were assessed. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was 34.1 ± 9.9 mm. The en‐bloc, complete en‐bloc, and curative resection rates were 97% (35/36), 97% (35/36), and 81% (29/36), respectively. The rate of severe bleeding during the procedure was 11% (4/36); however, it could be controlled endoscopically in all patients. The rate of intraoperative perforation and delayed bleeding was 0% (0/36). Delayed perforations occurred in one patient that required surgery. A long procedure time was correlated with the location of the flexure and poor endoscope operability. No recurrence was observed in any patient. None of the patients died of colorectal carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10423853
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104238532023-08-15 Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study Inagaki, Katsuaki Yamashita, Ken Oka, Shiro Tanino, Fumiaki Yamamoto, Noriko Kamigaichi, Yuki Tamari, Hirosato Nishimura, Tomoyuki Okamoto, Yuki Tanaka, Hidenori Kotachi, Takahiro Yuge, Ryo Urabe, Yuji Kitadai, Yasuhiko Tanaka, Shinji DEN Open Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Complete en‐bloc resection of pedunculated colorectal carcinoma is necessary for a proper pathological diagnosis. However, due to poor visibility, large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas are difficult to snare and resect en‐bloc using endoscopic resection or polypectomy. Additionally, the bleeding risk of large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas is relatively high. We aimed to assess the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study to assess 36 consecutive patients with 36 large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection and evaluated the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Furthermore, patients were divided into two groups according to the procedure time, and the factors related to the procedure time were assessed. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was 34.1 ± 9.9 mm. The en‐bloc, complete en‐bloc, and curative resection rates were 97% (35/36), 97% (35/36), and 81% (29/36), respectively. The rate of severe bleeding during the procedure was 11% (4/36); however, it could be controlled endoscopically in all patients. The rate of intraoperative perforation and delayed bleeding was 0% (0/36). Delayed perforations occurred in one patient that required surgery. A long procedure time was correlated with the location of the flexure and poor endoscope operability. No recurrence was observed in any patient. None of the patients died of colorectal carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed the feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinomas. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10423853/ /pubmed/37583677 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.277 Text en © 2023 The Authors. DEN Open published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Inagaki, Katsuaki
Yamashita, Ken
Oka, Shiro
Tanino, Fumiaki
Yamamoto, Noriko
Kamigaichi, Yuki
Tamari, Hirosato
Nishimura, Tomoyuki
Okamoto, Yuki
Tanaka, Hidenori
Kotachi, Takahiro
Yuge, Ryo
Urabe, Yuji
Kitadai, Yasuhiko
Tanaka, Shinji
Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study
title Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study
title_full Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study
title_fullStr Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study
title_short Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter study
title_sort clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for large pedunculated colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423853/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583677
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/deo2.277
work_keys_str_mv AT inagakikatsuaki clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT yamashitaken clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT okashiro clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT taninofumiaki clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT yamamotonoriko clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kamigaichiyuki clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT tamarihirosato clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT nishimuratomoyuki clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT okamotoyuki clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT tanakahidenori clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kotachitakahiro clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT yugeryo clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT urabeyuji clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT kitadaiyasuhiko clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy
AT tanakashinji clinicaloutcomesofendoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforlargepedunculatedcolorectalcarcinomaaretrospectivemulticenterstudy