Cargando…

Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones

BACKGROUND: Until recently, calls to the emergency medical service (EMS) from landline phones, which display the caller’s exact location at the dispatch center, had been common. Since the use of mobile phones has become widespread, many emergency calls are now made from mobile phones. Differences in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishimura, Takeshi, Suga, Masafumi, Hongo, Takashi, Yumoto, Tetsuya, Nakao, Atsunori, Ishihara, Satoshi, Naito, Hiromichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100434
_version_ 1785089549925351424
author Nishimura, Takeshi
Suga, Masafumi
Hongo, Takashi
Yumoto, Tetsuya
Nakao, Atsunori
Ishihara, Satoshi
Naito, Hiromichi
author_facet Nishimura, Takeshi
Suga, Masafumi
Hongo, Takashi
Yumoto, Tetsuya
Nakao, Atsunori
Ishihara, Satoshi
Naito, Hiromichi
author_sort Nishimura, Takeshi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Until recently, calls to the emergency medical service (EMS) from landline phones, which display the caller’s exact location at the dispatch center, had been common. Since the use of mobile phones has become widespread, many emergency calls are now made from mobile phones. Differences in outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients for whom EMS was called from mobile versus landline phones has not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, population-based analysis in Kobe, Japan to examine whether EMS calls from mobiles improved the prognosis of OHCA patients over EMS calls placed from landlines. The primary outcome was favorable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scores of 1 or 2 at discharge. Secondary outcomes were survival at one-month, survival at discharge, and time durations between call and EMS activities. RESULTS: Of 4,231 OHCA cases, 2,194 cases (706 landline cases vs. 1,488 mobile cases) were included in this study. The percentages of favorable neurological outcomes were 0.7% (5/706) in the landline group and 3.8% (56/1,488) in the mobile group. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression revealed that favorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–8.17, p = 0.03) were better in the mobile group, while one-month survival (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.80–2.14, p = 0.29) was not significantly different. Bystander CPR was more frequently administered in the mobile group (landlines 61.3% vs. mobiles 68.4%, p < 0.01). Time durations between call to EMS dispatch (184.5 [IQR 157–220 s] vs. 205 [IQR 174–248 s], p < 0.01) and EMS arrival (476.5 [IQR 377–599 s] vs. 491 [IQR 407.5–611.5 s], p < 0.01) were shorter in the landline group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the landline caller location display system seems effective for shorter times between EMS call and EMS arrival, mobile phone use was associated with better neurological outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10423887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104238872023-08-15 Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones Nishimura, Takeshi Suga, Masafumi Hongo, Takashi Yumoto, Tetsuya Nakao, Atsunori Ishihara, Satoshi Naito, Hiromichi Resusc Plus Clinical Paper BACKGROUND: Until recently, calls to the emergency medical service (EMS) from landline phones, which display the caller’s exact location at the dispatch center, had been common. Since the use of mobile phones has become widespread, many emergency calls are now made from mobile phones. Differences in outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients for whom EMS was called from mobile versus landline phones has not yet been fully elucidated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, population-based analysis in Kobe, Japan to examine whether EMS calls from mobiles improved the prognosis of OHCA patients over EMS calls placed from landlines. The primary outcome was favorable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scores of 1 or 2 at discharge. Secondary outcomes were survival at one-month, survival at discharge, and time durations between call and EMS activities. RESULTS: Of 4,231 OHCA cases, 2,194 cases (706 landline cases vs. 1,488 mobile cases) were included in this study. The percentages of favorable neurological outcomes were 0.7% (5/706) in the landline group and 3.8% (56/1,488) in the mobile group. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression revealed that favorable neurological outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 3.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–8.17, p = 0.03) were better in the mobile group, while one-month survival (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.80–2.14, p = 0.29) was not significantly different. Bystander CPR was more frequently administered in the mobile group (landlines 61.3% vs. mobiles 68.4%, p < 0.01). Time durations between call to EMS dispatch (184.5 [IQR 157–220 s] vs. 205 [IQR 174–248 s], p < 0.01) and EMS arrival (476.5 [IQR 377–599 s] vs. 491 [IQR 407.5–611.5 s], p < 0.01) were shorter in the landline group. CONCLUSIONS: Although the landline caller location display system seems effective for shorter times between EMS call and EMS arrival, mobile phone use was associated with better neurological outcomes. Elsevier 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10423887/ /pubmed/37583510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100434 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Paper
Nishimura, Takeshi
Suga, Masafumi
Hongo, Takashi
Yumoto, Tetsuya
Nakao, Atsunori
Ishihara, Satoshi
Naito, Hiromichi
Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones
title Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones
title_full Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones
title_fullStr Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones
title_short Comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: Emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones
title_sort comparison of outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: emergency calls placed from mobile phones vs. landline phones
topic Clinical Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10423887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100434
work_keys_str_mv AT nishimuratakeshi comparisonofoutcomesofoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientsemergencycallsplacedfrommobilephonesvslandlinephones
AT sugamasafumi comparisonofoutcomesofoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientsemergencycallsplacedfrommobilephonesvslandlinephones
AT hongotakashi comparisonofoutcomesofoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientsemergencycallsplacedfrommobilephonesvslandlinephones
AT yumototetsuya comparisonofoutcomesofoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientsemergencycallsplacedfrommobilephonesvslandlinephones
AT nakaoatsunori comparisonofoutcomesofoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientsemergencycallsplacedfrommobilephonesvslandlinephones
AT ishiharasatoshi comparisonofoutcomesofoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientsemergencycallsplacedfrommobilephonesvslandlinephones
AT naitohiromichi comparisonofoutcomesofoutofhospitalcardiacarrestpatientsemergencycallsplacedfrommobilephonesvslandlinephones