Cargando…
A response to Al et al. Trials 2023;24:233
In their recent paper, Al and colleagues (Trials 2023;24:233) argue that manipulation of the methods of recruitment using well-known techniques in order to increase enrollment can be ethically acceptable. This brief response challenges that notion as an affront to voluntariness and a devolution of t...
Autor principal: | Merz, Jon F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10424340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37574550 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07574-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The unblinding of statisticians in clinical trials: commentary on Iflaifel et al., Trials 2023
por: Parker, Richard A.
Publicado: (2023) -
History of the term ‘appeasement’: a response to Bailey et al. (2023)
por: Schlote, Sarah
Publicado: (2023) -
Reply to “Letter to the editor in response to the paper by Zuin et al. 2023”
por: Zuin, Marco, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Response to Sadek et al. and Kotlikoff et al.
por: Andersen, Ditte Caroline, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Response to letters by Baethge et al. and Martino et al.
por: Marwaha, Steven, et al.
Publicado: (2017)