Cargando…
Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery?
BACKGROUND: Although the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) was the first one of a eukaryote organism that was fully sequenced (in 1996), a complete understanding of the potential of encoded biomolecular mechanisms has not yet been achieved. Here, we wish to quantify how far the goal...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10424406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37574542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-023-00403-8 |
_version_ | 1785089669718867968 |
---|---|
author | Tantoso, Erwin Eisenhaber, Birgit Sinha, Swati Jensen, Lars Juhl Eisenhaber, Frank |
author_facet | Tantoso, Erwin Eisenhaber, Birgit Sinha, Swati Jensen, Lars Juhl Eisenhaber, Frank |
author_sort | Tantoso, Erwin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) was the first one of a eukaryote organism that was fully sequenced (in 1996), a complete understanding of the potential of encoded biomolecular mechanisms has not yet been achieved. Here, we wish to quantify how far the goal of a full list of S. cerevisiae gene functions still is. RESULTS: The scientific literature about S. cerevisiae protein-coding genes has been mapped onto the yeast genome via the mentioning of names for genomic regions in scientific publications. The match was quantified with the ratio of a given gene name’s occurrences to those of any gene names in the article. We find that ~ 230 elite genes with ≥ 75 full publication equivalents (FPEs, FPE = 1 is an idealized publication referring to just a single gene) command ~ 45% of all literature. At the same time, about two thirds of the genes (each with less than 10 FPEs) are described in just 12% of the literature (in average each such gene has just ~ 1.5% of the literature of an elite gene). About 600 genes have not been mentioned in any dedicated article. Compared with other groups of genes, the literature growth rates were highest for uncharacterized or understudied genes until late nineties of the twentieth century. Yet, these growth rates deteriorated and became negative thereafter. Thus, yeast function discovery for previously uncharacterized genes has returned to the level of ~ 1980. At the same time, literature for anyhow well-studied genes (with a threshold T10 (≥ 10 FPEs) and higher) remains steadily growing. CONCLUSIONS: Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? The data proves that the moment of publishing the full genome in reality coincides with the onset of decline of gene function discovery for previously uncharacterized genes. If the current status of literature about yeast molecular mechanisms can be extrapolated into the future, it will take about another ~ 50 years to complete the yeast gene function list. We found that a small group of scientific journals contributed extraordinarily to publishing early reports relevant to yeast gene function discoveries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13062-023-00403-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10424406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104244062023-08-15 Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? Tantoso, Erwin Eisenhaber, Birgit Sinha, Swati Jensen, Lars Juhl Eisenhaber, Frank Biol Direct Research BACKGROUND: Although the genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae) was the first one of a eukaryote organism that was fully sequenced (in 1996), a complete understanding of the potential of encoded biomolecular mechanisms has not yet been achieved. Here, we wish to quantify how far the goal of a full list of S. cerevisiae gene functions still is. RESULTS: The scientific literature about S. cerevisiae protein-coding genes has been mapped onto the yeast genome via the mentioning of names for genomic regions in scientific publications. The match was quantified with the ratio of a given gene name’s occurrences to those of any gene names in the article. We find that ~ 230 elite genes with ≥ 75 full publication equivalents (FPEs, FPE = 1 is an idealized publication referring to just a single gene) command ~ 45% of all literature. At the same time, about two thirds of the genes (each with less than 10 FPEs) are described in just 12% of the literature (in average each such gene has just ~ 1.5% of the literature of an elite gene). About 600 genes have not been mentioned in any dedicated article. Compared with other groups of genes, the literature growth rates were highest for uncharacterized or understudied genes until late nineties of the twentieth century. Yet, these growth rates deteriorated and became negative thereafter. Thus, yeast function discovery for previously uncharacterized genes has returned to the level of ~ 1980. At the same time, literature for anyhow well-studied genes (with a threshold T10 (≥ 10 FPEs) and higher) remains steadily growing. CONCLUSIONS: Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? The data proves that the moment of publishing the full genome in reality coincides with the onset of decline of gene function discovery for previously uncharacterized genes. If the current status of literature about yeast molecular mechanisms can be extrapolated into the future, it will take about another ~ 50 years to complete the yeast gene function list. We found that a small group of scientific journals contributed extraordinarily to publishing early reports relevant to yeast gene function discoveries. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13062-023-00403-8. BioMed Central 2023-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10424406/ /pubmed/37574542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-023-00403-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tantoso, Erwin Eisenhaber, Birgit Sinha, Swati Jensen, Lars Juhl Eisenhaber, Frank Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? |
title | Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? |
title_full | Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? |
title_fullStr | Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? |
title_full_unstemmed | Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? |
title_short | Did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? |
title_sort | did the early full genome sequencing of yeast boost gene function discovery? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10424406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37574542 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13062-023-00403-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tantosoerwin didtheearlyfullgenomesequencingofyeastboostgenefunctiondiscovery AT eisenhaberbirgit didtheearlyfullgenomesequencingofyeastboostgenefunctiondiscovery AT sinhaswati didtheearlyfullgenomesequencingofyeastboostgenefunctiondiscovery AT jensenlarsjuhl didtheearlyfullgenomesequencingofyeastboostgenefunctiondiscovery AT eisenhaberfrank didtheearlyfullgenomesequencingofyeastboostgenefunctiondiscovery |