Cargando…

Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review

INTRODUCTION: Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection risk factors allows targeted public health and social measures (PHSM). As new, more transmissible variants of concern (VoC) emerge, vaccination rates increase and PHSM are eased, it is important to understand any potential change to infection risk facto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Matthew, Hart, John, Bhattacharya, Oashe, Russell, Fiona M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10424847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178167
_version_ 1785089748321173504
author Harris, Matthew
Hart, John
Bhattacharya, Oashe
Russell, Fiona M.
author_facet Harris, Matthew
Hart, John
Bhattacharya, Oashe
Russell, Fiona M.
author_sort Harris, Matthew
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection risk factors allows targeted public health and social measures (PHSM). As new, more transmissible variants of concern (VoC) emerge, vaccination rates increase and PHSM are eased, it is important to understand any potential change to infection risk factors. The aim of this systematic literature review is to describe the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection by VoC. METHODS: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase databases on 5 May 2022. Eligibility included: observational studies published in English after 1 January 2020; any age group; the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection; and any potential risk factors investigated in the study. Results were synthesized into a narrative summary with respect to measures of association, by VoC. ROBINS-E tool was utilized for risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Of 6,197 studies retrieved, 43 studies were included after screening. Common risk factors included older age, minority ethnic group, low socioeconomic status, male gender, increased household size, occupation/lower income level, inability to work from home, public transport use, and lower education level. Most studies were undertaken when the ancestral strain was predominant. Many studies had some selection bias due to testing criteria and limited laboratory capacity. CONCLUSION: Understanding who is at risk enables the development of strategies that target priority groups at each of the different stages of a pandemic and helps inform vaccination strategies and other interventions which may also inform public health responses to future respiratory infection outbreaks. While it was not possible to determine changes to infection risk by recent VoC in this review, the risk factors identified will add to the overall understanding of the groups who are at greatest risk of infection in the early stages of a respiratory virus outbreak. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022330706, PROSPERO [CRD42022330706].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10424847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104248472023-08-15 Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review Harris, Matthew Hart, John Bhattacharya, Oashe Russell, Fiona M. Front Public Health Public Health INTRODUCTION: Identifying SARS-CoV-2 infection risk factors allows targeted public health and social measures (PHSM). As new, more transmissible variants of concern (VoC) emerge, vaccination rates increase and PHSM are eased, it is important to understand any potential change to infection risk factors. The aim of this systematic literature review is to describe the risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection by VoC. METHODS: A literature search was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed and Embase databases on 5 May 2022. Eligibility included: observational studies published in English after 1 January 2020; any age group; the outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection; and any potential risk factors investigated in the study. Results were synthesized into a narrative summary with respect to measures of association, by VoC. ROBINS-E tool was utilized for risk of bias assessment. RESULTS: Of 6,197 studies retrieved, 43 studies were included after screening. Common risk factors included older age, minority ethnic group, low socioeconomic status, male gender, increased household size, occupation/lower income level, inability to work from home, public transport use, and lower education level. Most studies were undertaken when the ancestral strain was predominant. Many studies had some selection bias due to testing criteria and limited laboratory capacity. CONCLUSION: Understanding who is at risk enables the development of strategies that target priority groups at each of the different stages of a pandemic and helps inform vaccination strategies and other interventions which may also inform public health responses to future respiratory infection outbreaks. While it was not possible to determine changes to infection risk by recent VoC in this review, the risk factors identified will add to the overall understanding of the groups who are at greatest risk of infection in the early stages of a respiratory virus outbreak. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022330706, PROSPERO [CRD42022330706]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10424847/ /pubmed/37583888 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178167 Text en Copyright © 2023 Harris, Hart, Bhattacharya and Russell. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Harris, Matthew
Hart, John
Bhattacharya, Oashe
Russell, Fiona M.
Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review
title Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review
title_full Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review
title_short Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review
title_sort risk factors for sars-cov-2 infection during the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic: a systematic literature review
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10424847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583888
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1178167
work_keys_str_mv AT harrismatthew riskfactorsforsarscov2infectionduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicasystematicliteraturereview
AT hartjohn riskfactorsforsarscov2infectionduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicasystematicliteraturereview
AT bhattacharyaoashe riskfactorsforsarscov2infectionduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicasystematicliteraturereview
AT russellfionam riskfactorsforsarscov2infectionduringtheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemicasystematicliteraturereview