Cargando…

Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA

The infrageneric taxonomy system, species delimitation, and interspecies systematic relationships of Leontopodium remain controversial and complex. However, only a few studies have focused on the molecular phylogeny of this genus. In this study, the characteristics of 43 chloroplast genomes of Leont...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xue-Min, Wei, Zhen, Sun, Jun-Zhe, Zhao, Qing-Fei, Lu, Yang, Wang, Zhen-Long, Zhu, Shi-Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583593
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1163065
_version_ 1785089791596953600
author Xu, Xue-Min
Wei, Zhen
Sun, Jun-Zhe
Zhao, Qing-Fei
Lu, Yang
Wang, Zhen-Long
Zhu, Shi-Xin
author_facet Xu, Xue-Min
Wei, Zhen
Sun, Jun-Zhe
Zhao, Qing-Fei
Lu, Yang
Wang, Zhen-Long
Zhu, Shi-Xin
author_sort Xu, Xue-Min
collection PubMed
description The infrageneric taxonomy system, species delimitation, and interspecies systematic relationships of Leontopodium remain controversial and complex. However, only a few studies have focused on the molecular phylogeny of this genus. In this study, the characteristics of 43 chloroplast genomes of Leontopodium and its closely related genera were analyzed. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred based on chloroplast genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA). Finally, together with the morphological characteristics, the relationships within Leontopodium were identified and discussed. The results showed that the chloroplast genomes of Filago, Gamochaeta, and Leontopodium were well-conserved in terms of gene number, gene order, and GC content. The most remarkable differences among the three genera were the length of the complete chloroplast genome, large single-copy region, small single-copy region, and inverted repeat region. In addition, the chloroplast genome structure of Leontopodium exhibited high consistency and was obviously different from that of Filago and Gamochaeta in some regions, such as matk, trnK (UUU)-rps16, petN-psbM, and trnE (UUC)-rpoB. All the phylogenetic trees indicated that Leontopodium was monophyletic. Except for the subgeneric level, our molecular phylogenetic results were inconsistent with the previous taxonomic system, which was based on morphological characteristics. Nevertheless, we found that the characteristics of the leaf base, stem types, and carpopodium base were phylogenetically correlated and may have potential value in the taxonomic study of Leontopodium. In the phylogenetic trees inferred using complete chloroplast genomes, the subgen. Leontopodium was divided into two clades (Clades 1 and 2), with most species in Clade 1 having herbaceous stems, amplexicaul, or sheathed leaves, and constricted carpopodium; most species in Clade 2 had woody stems, not amplexicaul and sheathed leaves, and not constricted carpopodium.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10425225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104252252023-08-15 Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA Xu, Xue-Min Wei, Zhen Sun, Jun-Zhe Zhao, Qing-Fei Lu, Yang Wang, Zhen-Long Zhu, Shi-Xin Front Plant Sci Plant Science The infrageneric taxonomy system, species delimitation, and interspecies systematic relationships of Leontopodium remain controversial and complex. However, only a few studies have focused on the molecular phylogeny of this genus. In this study, the characteristics of 43 chloroplast genomes of Leontopodium and its closely related genera were analyzed. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred based on chloroplast genomes and nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA). Finally, together with the morphological characteristics, the relationships within Leontopodium were identified and discussed. The results showed that the chloroplast genomes of Filago, Gamochaeta, and Leontopodium were well-conserved in terms of gene number, gene order, and GC content. The most remarkable differences among the three genera were the length of the complete chloroplast genome, large single-copy region, small single-copy region, and inverted repeat region. In addition, the chloroplast genome structure of Leontopodium exhibited high consistency and was obviously different from that of Filago and Gamochaeta in some regions, such as matk, trnK (UUU)-rps16, petN-psbM, and trnE (UUC)-rpoB. All the phylogenetic trees indicated that Leontopodium was monophyletic. Except for the subgeneric level, our molecular phylogenetic results were inconsistent with the previous taxonomic system, which was based on morphological characteristics. Nevertheless, we found that the characteristics of the leaf base, stem types, and carpopodium base were phylogenetically correlated and may have potential value in the taxonomic study of Leontopodium. In the phylogenetic trees inferred using complete chloroplast genomes, the subgen. Leontopodium was divided into two clades (Clades 1 and 2), with most species in Clade 1 having herbaceous stems, amplexicaul, or sheathed leaves, and constricted carpopodium; most species in Clade 2 had woody stems, not amplexicaul and sheathed leaves, and not constricted carpopodium. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10425225/ /pubmed/37583593 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1163065 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xu, Wei, Sun, Zhao, Lu, Wang and Zhu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Xu, Xue-Min
Wei, Zhen
Sun, Jun-Zhe
Zhao, Qing-Fei
Lu, Yang
Wang, Zhen-Long
Zhu, Shi-Xin
Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA
title Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA
title_full Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA
title_fullStr Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA
title_full_unstemmed Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA
title_short Phylogeny of Leontopodium (Asteraceae) in China—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal DNA
title_sort phylogeny of leontopodium (asteraceae) in china—with a reference to plastid genome and nuclear ribosomal dna
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37583593
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1163065
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxuemin phylogenyofleontopodiumasteraceaeinchinawithareferencetoplastidgenomeandnuclearribosomaldna
AT weizhen phylogenyofleontopodiumasteraceaeinchinawithareferencetoplastidgenomeandnuclearribosomaldna
AT sunjunzhe phylogenyofleontopodiumasteraceaeinchinawithareferencetoplastidgenomeandnuclearribosomaldna
AT zhaoqingfei phylogenyofleontopodiumasteraceaeinchinawithareferencetoplastidgenomeandnuclearribosomaldna
AT luyang phylogenyofleontopodiumasteraceaeinchinawithareferencetoplastidgenomeandnuclearribosomaldna
AT wangzhenlong phylogenyofleontopodiumasteraceaeinchinawithareferencetoplastidgenomeandnuclearribosomaldna
AT zhushixin phylogenyofleontopodiumasteraceaeinchinawithareferencetoplastidgenomeandnuclearribosomaldna