Cargando…
Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center
BACKGROUND: The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at Nebraska Medicine collaborated with a board-certified allergist to develop a penicillin allergy guidance document for treating inpatients with self-reported allergy. This guidance contains an algorithm for evaluating and safely challenging p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1161683 |
_version_ | 1785089803191058432 |
---|---|
author | Sunagawa, Shawnalyn W. Bergman, Scott J. Kreikemeier, Emily Watkins, Andrew B. Alexander, Bryan T. Miller, Molly M. Schroeder, Danny Stohs, Erica J. Van Schooneveld, Trevor C. May, Sara M. |
author_facet | Sunagawa, Shawnalyn W. Bergman, Scott J. Kreikemeier, Emily Watkins, Andrew B. Alexander, Bryan T. Miller, Molly M. Schroeder, Danny Stohs, Erica J. Van Schooneveld, Trevor C. May, Sara M. |
author_sort | Sunagawa, Shawnalyn W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at Nebraska Medicine collaborated with a board-certified allergist to develop a penicillin allergy guidance document for treating inpatients with self-reported allergy. This guidance contains an algorithm for evaluating and safely challenging penicillin-allergic patients with beta-lactams without inpatient allergy consults being available. METHODS: Following multi-disciplinary review, an order set for beta-lactam graded challenges (GC) was implemented in 2018. This contains recommended monitoring and detailed medication orders to challenge patients with various beta-lactam agents. Inpatient orders for GC from 3/2018–6/2022 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate ordering characteristics, outcomes of the challenge, and whether documentation of the allergy history was updated. All beta-lactam challenges administered to inpatients were included, and descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 157 GC were administered; 13 with oral amoxicillin and 144 with intravenous (IV) beta-lactams. Ceftriaxone accounted for the most challenges (43%). All oral challenges were recommended by an Infectious Diseases consult service, as were a majority of IV challenges (60%). Less than one in five were administered in an ICU (19%). Almost all (n = 150, 96%) were tolerated without any adverse event. There was one reaction (1%) of hives and six (4%) involving a rash, none of which had persistent effects. Allergy information was updated in the electronic health record after 92% of the challenges. CONCLUSION: Both intravenous and oral beta-lactam graded challenges were implemented successfully in a hospital without a regular inpatient allergy consult service. They were well-tolerated, administered primarily in non-ICU settings, and were often ordered by non-specialist services. In patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy, these results demonstrate the utility and safety of a broadly adopted beta-lactam GC process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10425280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104252802023-08-16 Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center Sunagawa, Shawnalyn W. Bergman, Scott J. Kreikemeier, Emily Watkins, Andrew B. Alexander, Bryan T. Miller, Molly M. Schroeder, Danny Stohs, Erica J. Van Schooneveld, Trevor C. May, Sara M. Front Allergy Allergy BACKGROUND: The Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) at Nebraska Medicine collaborated with a board-certified allergist to develop a penicillin allergy guidance document for treating inpatients with self-reported allergy. This guidance contains an algorithm for evaluating and safely challenging penicillin-allergic patients with beta-lactams without inpatient allergy consults being available. METHODS: Following multi-disciplinary review, an order set for beta-lactam graded challenges (GC) was implemented in 2018. This contains recommended monitoring and detailed medication orders to challenge patients with various beta-lactam agents. Inpatient orders for GC from 3/2018–6/2022 were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate ordering characteristics, outcomes of the challenge, and whether documentation of the allergy history was updated. All beta-lactam challenges administered to inpatients were included, and descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 157 GC were administered; 13 with oral amoxicillin and 144 with intravenous (IV) beta-lactams. Ceftriaxone accounted for the most challenges (43%). All oral challenges were recommended by an Infectious Diseases consult service, as were a majority of IV challenges (60%). Less than one in five were administered in an ICU (19%). Almost all (n = 150, 96%) were tolerated without any adverse event. There was one reaction (1%) of hives and six (4%) involving a rash, none of which had persistent effects. Allergy information was updated in the electronic health record after 92% of the challenges. CONCLUSION: Both intravenous and oral beta-lactam graded challenges were implemented successfully in a hospital without a regular inpatient allergy consult service. They were well-tolerated, administered primarily in non-ICU settings, and were often ordered by non-specialist services. In patients with a self-reported penicillin allergy, these results demonstrate the utility and safety of a broadly adopted beta-lactam GC process. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10425280/ /pubmed/37588449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1161683 Text en © 2023 Sunagawa, Bergman, Kreikemeier, Watkins, Alexander, Miller, Schroeder, Stohs, Van Schooneveld and May. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Allergy Sunagawa, Shawnalyn W. Bergman, Scott J. Kreikemeier, Emily Watkins, Andrew B. Alexander, Bryan T. Miller, Molly M. Schroeder, Danny Stohs, Erica J. Van Schooneveld, Trevor C. May, Sara M. Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center |
title | Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center |
title_full | Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center |
title_fullStr | Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center |
title_short | Use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center |
title_sort | use of a beta-lactam graded challenge process for inpatients with self-reported penicillin allergies at an academic medical center |
topic | Allergy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588449 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1161683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sunagawashawnalynw useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT bergmanscottj useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT kreikemeieremily useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT watkinsandrewb useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT alexanderbryant useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT millermollym useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT schroederdanny useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT stohsericaj useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT vanschooneveldtrevorc useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter AT maysaram useofabetalactamgradedchallengeprocessforinpatientswithselfreportedpenicillinallergiesatanacademicmedicalcenter |