Cargando…

The prognostic importance of red blood cell distribution width for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: For cancer patients, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a readily accessible and cost-effective preoperative prognostic predictor. This study aimed to determine whether RDW is a predictive factor for individuals undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A liter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Shuai, Kong, Jian, Zhao, Zheng-Fei, Yao, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37588748
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-23-53
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: For cancer patients, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a readily accessible and cost-effective preoperative prognostic predictor. This study aimed to determine whether RDW is a predictive factor for individuals undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A literature search was performed to select relevant studies for inclusion in the subsequent meta-analysis. Relevant data were pooled to assess the association between RDW and GC results, including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS), as well as clinicopathological features. RESULTS: The meta-analysis and systemic review included data from 8 studies comprising 1,587 individuals diagnosed with GC. In this context, RDW refers to the coefficient of variation of RDW (RDW-CV). A high level of RDW-CV was significantly associated with older age [odds ratio (OR) =2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.72–2.94; P<0.00001], larger tumor diameter (OR =1.90; 95% CI: 1.42–2.56; P<0.0001), and vascular invasion (OR =2.22; 95% CI: 1.10–4.49; P=0.03). After hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were pooled, RDW-CV was found to be an independent prognostic factor of OS (HR =1.79; 95% CI: 1.21–2.66; I(2)=85%; P=0.004), DFS (HR =1.81; 95% CI: 1.37–2.39; I(2)=0%; P<0.0001), and CSS (HR =2.73; 95% CI: 1.36–5.49; I(2)=0%; P=0.005) in patients with GC. CONCLUSIONS: The association between high levels of RDW-CV and poor survival in GC suggests that RDW-CV may be a viable prognostic indicator for patients with GC.