Cargando…

Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review

Background: Employee-driven innovation (EDI) occurs when frontline actors in health organizations use their firsthand experience to spur new ideas to transform care. Despite its increasing prevalence in health organizations, the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized have recei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cadeddu, Stephanie B.M., Dare, Labante Outcha, Denis, Jean-Louis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37579391
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6734
_version_ 1785089885320773632
author Cadeddu, Stephanie B.M.
Dare, Labante Outcha
Denis, Jean-Louis
author_facet Cadeddu, Stephanie B.M.
Dare, Labante Outcha
Denis, Jean-Louis
author_sort Cadeddu, Stephanie B.M.
collection PubMed
description Background: Employee-driven innovation (EDI) occurs when frontline actors in health organizations use their firsthand experience to spur new ideas to transform care. Despite its increasing prevalence in health organizations, the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized have received little scholarly attention. Methods: This scoping review identifies gaps and assembles existing knowledge on four questions: What is EDI in health organizations and which frontline actors are involved? What are the characteristics of the EDI process? What contextual factors enable or impede EDI? And what benefits does EDI bring to health organizations? We searched seven databases with keywords related to EDI in health organizations. After screening 1580 studies by title and abstract, we undertook full-text review of 453 articles, retaining 60 for analysis. We performed a descriptive and an inductive thematic analysis guided by the four questions. Results: Findings reveal an heterogeneous literature. Most articles are descriptive (n = 41). Few studies are conceptual and empirical (n = 15) and four are conference papers. EDI was often described as a participatory, learning innovation process involving frontline clinical and non-clinical staff and managers. Majority EDI were top-down, often driven by the organization’s focus on participatory improvement and innovation and research-based initiatives. Five categories of methods is used in top-down EDI, two thirds of which includes a learning, a team and/or a digital component. Hybrid EDI often involves a team-based component. Bottom-up EDI emerged spontaneously from the work of frontline actors. Enablers, barriers, and benefits of EDI are seen at macro, organizational, team and individual levels; some benefits spread to other health organizations and health systems. Conclusion: This scoping review provides a comprehensive understanding of the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized. It offers insights for researchers, health organizations, and policy-makers about how and why frontline actors’ involvement is crucial for the transformation of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10425658
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104256582023-08-16 Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review Cadeddu, Stephanie B.M. Dare, Labante Outcha Denis, Jean-Louis Int J Health Policy Manag Scoping Review Background: Employee-driven innovation (EDI) occurs when frontline actors in health organizations use their firsthand experience to spur new ideas to transform care. Despite its increasing prevalence in health organizations, the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized have received little scholarly attention. Methods: This scoping review identifies gaps and assembles existing knowledge on four questions: What is EDI in health organizations and which frontline actors are involved? What are the characteristics of the EDI process? What contextual factors enable or impede EDI? And what benefits does EDI bring to health organizations? We searched seven databases with keywords related to EDI in health organizations. After screening 1580 studies by title and abstract, we undertook full-text review of 453 articles, retaining 60 for analysis. We performed a descriptive and an inductive thematic analysis guided by the four questions. Results: Findings reveal an heterogeneous literature. Most articles are descriptive (n = 41). Few studies are conceptual and empirical (n = 15) and four are conference papers. EDI was often described as a participatory, learning innovation process involving frontline clinical and non-clinical staff and managers. Majority EDI were top-down, often driven by the organization’s focus on participatory improvement and innovation and research-based initiatives. Five categories of methods is used in top-down EDI, two thirds of which includes a learning, a team and/or a digital component. Hybrid EDI often involves a team-based component. Bottom-up EDI emerged spontaneously from the work of frontline actors. Enablers, barriers, and benefits of EDI are seen at macro, organizational, team and individual levels; some benefits spread to other health organizations and health systems. Conclusion: This scoping review provides a comprehensive understanding of the organizational conditions under which EDI is operationalized. It offers insights for researchers, health organizations, and policy-makers about how and why frontline actors’ involvement is crucial for the transformation of care. Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2023-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10425658/ /pubmed/37579391 http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6734 Text en © 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Scoping Review
Cadeddu, Stephanie B.M.
Dare, Labante Outcha
Denis, Jean-Louis
Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review
title Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review
title_full Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review
title_fullStr Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review
title_short Employee-Driven Innovation in Health Organizations: Insights From a Scoping Review
title_sort employee-driven innovation in health organizations: insights from a scoping review
topic Scoping Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10425658/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37579391
http://dx.doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2023.6734
work_keys_str_mv AT cadeddustephaniebm employeedriveninnovationinhealthorganizationsinsightsfromascopingreview
AT darelabanteoutcha employeedriveninnovationinhealthorganizationsinsightsfromascopingreview
AT denisjeanlouis employeedriveninnovationinhealthorganizationsinsightsfromascopingreview